Given a functor we say that admits a proadjoint if the canonical extension of to the categories of pro-objects has a left adjoint . In other words, there is a functor and a bijection
natural in and , where is the Yoneda embedding into the category of proobjects . Equivalently, for every prorepresentable functor , the functor is also prorepresentable.
If an (∞,1)-topos has a genuine left adjoint (∞,1)-functor to its constant ∞-stack functor , then that may be interpreted as sending each object to its fundamental ∞-groupoid, see at fundamental ∞-groupoid of a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
In general such a left adjoint does not exist, but the pro-left adjoint to always exists. This hence produces a pro-version of the fundamental ∞-groupoid-construction known generally as the étale homotopy type. In algebraic geometry and arithmetic geometry this reproduces the content of Galois theory (the pro-etale fundamental group is the Galois group/algebraic fundamental group) while in topology this reproduces the concept of shape. (Whence the term shape modality for ).
J.-M. Cordier, T. Porter, Shape theory : Categorical Methods of Approximation, (sec. 2.3), Mathematics and its Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd., March 1989, 207 pages.Dover addition (2008) (Link to publishers here)
Marc Hoyois, A note on Étale homotopy, 2013 (pdf)
Last revised on October 26, 2015 at 21:07:18. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.