A subset of a set is proper if it is not the improper subset of ( as a subset of itself). We may also say (in the context of concrete sets) that is a proper superset of or that properly contains? .
In material set theory, we may state that is proper in any of these equivalent ways:
Actually, these three definitions are equivalent only if we accept the principle of excluded middle; in constructive mathematics, we usually prefer (3). (For example, consider the notion of proper filter on a set , thought of as a subset of the power set of .) However, (3) is not predicative; see positive element for discussion of this in the dual context. Also, (2) may be strengthened using an inequality relation other than the denial inequality.
In structural set theory, subsets are represented by injections, and so we may state that the injection is proper in any of these equivalent ways:
Similarly as the case in material set theory, these three definitions are equivalent only if we accept the principle of excluded middle.
In any category , subsets become subobjects and are thus represented by the monomorphisms in . Then a proper subobject is defined in any of the following ways:
Last revised on November 13, 2022 at 03:17:54. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.