short map

Short maps

Short maps


A short map is a well-behaved sort of morphism of metric spaces (or a generalisation of metric spaces, such as the extended quasi-pseudo-versions, or gauge spaces or prometric spaces). Short maps go by many names in the literature, often ad hoc, such as distance-nonincreasing maps and weak contractions, but ‘short map’ seems to be increasing in popularity.


A function f:XYf\colon X \to Y is short if d(f(a),f(b))e(a,b)d(f(a),f(b)) \leq e(a,b) for every a,bXa,b \in X. Here dd and ee are (respectively) the metrics (or generalisations of metrics) on XX and YY. If XX and YY are (or may be) gauge spaces and so have several (pseudo)metrics on them, then we require that, for every gauging distance dd on XX, there exists a gauging distance ee on YY such that the above inequality holds for all aa and bb.

The category of metric spaces

We define MetMet to be the category whose objects are Lawvere metric spaces and whose morphisms are short maps.

MetMet is complete and admits a faithful functor from Ban (the category of Banach spaces and short linear operators).

MetMet may be made into an \mathcal{M}-category by taking short maps as the tight morphisms and some more generous notion of maps (such as continuous maps) as the loose morphisms.

If instead we use ordinary metric spaces, which includes the axioms of finiteness d(x,y)<d(x, y) \lt \infty, symmetry d(x,y)=d(y,x)d(x, y) = d(y, x), and separability (d(x,y)=0d(x, y) = 0 implies x=yx = y), then the category Met ordMet_{ord} (with short maps as morphisms) is not so nice as MetMet. For example, Met ordMet_{ord} fails to have arbitrary products iIX i\prod_{i \in I} X_i, on account of the finiteness axiom where the putative distance

d((x i),(y i))=sup id(x i,y i)d((x_i), (y_i)) = \sup_i d(x_i, y_i)

may not exist as a finite number. However, if all the ordinary metric spaces X iX_i are uniformly bounded in diameter, then this formula does give the product. Note well though that the topology induced by this product will not be the same as the product topology (cf. the discussion below).


There are many other kinds of maps between metric spaces; continuous maps and uniformly continuous maps are more general, while isometries and contractions are more restrictive. What's so special about short maps that we consider them the proper morphisms between metric spaces?

One answer is to look at Lawvere's characterisation of metric spaces as certain enriched categories; see Lawvere metric space. Then the short maps are precisely the enriched functors between metric spaces.

Another answer is to consider what the category-theoretic isomorphisms between metric spaces are; by the definition of metric spaces as structured sets, these are the global isometries. So for a good notion of morphism, we need to recover global isometries as isomorphisms. Using continuous or uniformly continuous maps, we recover homeomorphisms or uniform homeomorphisms as isomorphisms, which are too general; this really gives us the category of metrisable topological spaces or of metrisable uniform spaces rather than the category of metric spaces. Using contractions, we do not even get a category; the identity function is not a contraction. We could still use global isometries themselves as morphisms, but since this defines a groupoid, we should look for a more general notion of morphism that still gives global isometries as isomorphism. And short maps do that.

Short maps give the category of metric spaces some nice properties. In particular, MetMet is complete, which does not hold using either global isometries or distance-preserving maps as morphisms. This interacts with the properties of the category of Banach spaces; as a Banach space may be defined as a set with compatible vector-space and metric-space structures, so a Banach space morphism is a function that is both linear and short: the short linear maps.

Injective objects in Met ordMet_{ord}

In Met ordMet_{ord} every object XX admits an injective hull ε(X)\varepsilon(X). The space ε(X)\varepsilon(X) is compact if XX is compact. Furthermore every compact metric space has an injective boundary that is the smallest subspace AA of XX such that ε(A)=X\varepsilon(A) = X.


Injective objects Met ordMet_{ord} have been studied in

  • Aronszajn, Nachman, and Prom Panitchpakdi. “Extension of uniformly continuous transformations and hyperconvex metric spaces.” Pacific Journal of Mathematics 6.3 (1956): 405-439.

  • Isbell, John R. “Six theorems about injective metric spaces.” Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 39.1 (1964): 65-76.

  • Anton Petrunin, “Lectures on metric geometry” 2020, PDF.

An overview of results is included in

  • Culbertson, Jared, Dan P. Guralnik, and Peter F. Stiller. “Injective metrizability and the duality theory of cubings.” Expositiones Mathematicae 37.4 (2019): 410-453. arXiv: 1502.00126.

Last revised on April 24, 2021 at 23:11:04. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.