nLab twisted arrow (∞,1)-category

Contents

Contents

Idea

This is the generalization of twisted arrow category to (∞,1)-categories.

Definition

In the case of quasicategories, we can give an explicit definition. For a quasi-category CC we define the twisted arrow quasi-category Tw(C)Tw(C) to be

Tw(C) n=sSet((Δ n) op(Δ n),C) Tw(C)_n = sSet((\Delta^n)^{op} \star (\Delta^n), C)

The insertions into the components of the join determine natural transformations src:Tw(C)C opsrc : Tw(C) \to C^{op} and tgt:Tw(C)Ctgt : Tw(C) \to C.

By Kerodon, tag 03K9, this definition respects equivalences between quasi-categories, and thus descends to a functor Tw:(,1)Cat(,1)CatTw : (\infty,1)Cat \to (\infty,1)Cat.

Since (Δ n) op(Δ n)(\Delta^n)^{op} \star (\Delta^n) is preserved by taking opposites, this construction satisfies Tw(C)=Tw(C op)Tw(C) = Tw(C^{op}), and swaps the source and target maps.

The opposite convention often appears in the literature,

Tw¯(C) n=sSet((Δ n)(Δ n) op,C) \overline{Tw}(C)_n = sSet((\Delta^n) \star (\Delta^n)^{op}, C)

and comes with natural transformations src¯:Tw¯(C)C\overline{src} : \overline{Tw}(C) \to C and tgt¯:Tw¯(C)C op\overline{tgt} : \overline{Tw}(C) \to C^{op}.

This satisfies Tw¯(C)Tw(C) op\overline{Tw}(C) \simeq Tw(C)^{op}.

Properties

If CC is a 1-category, then Tw(C)Tw(C) agrees with the 1-categorical version. In the quasi-category model we have an even stronger statement

Proposition

If CC is a 1-category, there is an isomorphism T:N(Tw(C))Tw(N(C))T : N(Tw(C)) \cong Tw(N(C)) of simplicial sets, uniquely determined by the properties that T(f)=fT(f) = f and that the source and target maps are consistent with the obvious map N(C op×C)N(C) op×N(C)N(C^{op} \times C) \cong N(C)^{op} \times N(C).

Proof

This is Kerodon, tag 03JN.

For a quasi-category CC, both Tw(C)Tw(C) and Tw¯(C)\overline{Tw}(C) are quasi-categories. This follows from the following characterization:

Proposition
  • Tw(C)C op×CTw(C) \to C^{op} \times C is the left fibration classfied by the hom-space functor C op×CGpdC^{op} \times C \to \infty Gpd.

  • Tw¯(C)C×C op\overline{Tw}(C) \to C \times C^{op} is the right fibration classified the hom-space functor C op×CGpdC^{op} \times C \to \infty Gpd.

Proof

This description of Tw¯(C)\overline{Tw}(C) is Lurie 4.2.5. The left fibration classified by a map is the opposite of the right fibration classified by the same map. Alternatively, this is Kerodon, tag 03JQ.

This means that we have the formulas Tw(C)el(hom C)(*hom)Tw(C) \simeq el(\hom_C) \simeq ({*} \downarrow \hom), just as in the 1-category version.

We can say more:

Proposition

If CDC \to D is an inner fibration of simplicial sets, then the universal map

Tw(C)(C op×C)× D op×DTw(D)Tw(C) \to (C^{op} \times C) \times_{D^{\op} \times D} Tw(D)

is a left fibration.

Proof

This is Kerodon, tag 03JT.

Corollary

Tw:sSetsSetTw : sSet \to sSet is a right Quillen functor with respect to the model structure for quasicategories

Proof

Let LL be the left adjoint. LL preserves monomorphisms, so we need to show it preserves trivial cofibrations. The model structure for quasicategories is a Cisinski model structure, so a map is a trivial cofibration iff it has the left lifting property against fibrations between fibrant objects, which in this case are the categorical fibrations between quasicategories.

Suppose ii is a trivial cofibration, and let f:CDf : C \to D be a categorical fibration between quasi-categories. Since left Kan fibrations are categorical fibrations, the previous lemma implies Tw(f)Tw(f) is a categorical fibration between quasicategories, so iTw(f)i \perp Tw(f), and thus L(i)fL(i) \perp f.

References

Last revised on March 12, 2024 at 11:36:31. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.