A two-valued topos is a topos with exactly two truth values.
A topos is called two-valued if its subobject classifier is two-valued, with precisely two global elements and .
In particular, a two-valued topos is consistent i.e. .
Since classifies subobjects , these correspond precisely to global elements whence a topos is two-valued precisely if the terminal object has exactly the two subobjects and .
Two-valued toposes are connected i.e. and implies and or vice versa. This holds because , are disjoint subobjects of but has only the two trivial subobjects.
Let be a geometric theory over the signature . Then is called complete if every geometric sentence over is -provably equivalent to either or but not both. A geometric theory is complete precisely iff its classifying topos is two-valued (Caramello 2012, remark 2.5).
Being two-valued is different from saying that : The latter property characterizes Boolean toposes but a Boolean topos is not necessarily two-valued - the easiest consistent example possibly being which is four-valued, more complicated ones often arising in intermediates steps in set-theoretic forcing (cf. continuum hypothesis). There exists a general filter quotient construction turning a Boolean topos into a two-valued Boolean topos (cf. Mac Lane-Moerdijk 1994, pp.256ff, 274).
Though the forcing models resulting from the above mentioned filter-quotient construction provide a plethora of examples of Boolean two-valued toposes other than , two-valued toposes are by no means bound to be Boolean.
In fact, there exists a rich supply of two-valued toposes that are not Boolean provided by the toposes of actions of monoids : Since the underlying set of consists of all right ideals of with acting on a right ideal by mapping it to a global element picks out a right ideal that satisfies for all , inheriting by equivariance the triviality of the action on with underlying set a singleton, which implies or , the latter since entails Whence is two-valued but it is a well known excercise that is Boolean precisely iff is a group.
Olivia Caramello, Atomic toposes and countable categoricity , Appl. Cat. Struc. 20 no. 4 (2012) pp.379-391. (arXiv:0811.3547)
Saunders Mac Lane, Ieke Moerdijk, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic , Springer Heidelberg 1994.
Last revised on May 14, 2024 at 20:51:48. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.