Definition 1.1. Let $\dagger$ be an idempotent monad on a presentable $(\infty,1)$-category $C$. A morphism $f:X\to Y$ is called $\dagger$-closed if

is a pullback square.

Theorem 1.2. The class of $\dagger$-closed morphisms $C$ satisfies the following closure properties:

(1) Every equivalence is $\dagger$-closed.

(2) The composite of two $\dagger$-closed morphisms is $\dagger$-closed.

(3) The left cancellation property is satisfied: If $h=g\circ f$ and $h$ and $g$ are $\dagger$-closed, then so is $f$.

(4) Any retract of a $\dagger$-closed morphism is $\dagger$-closed.

(5) The class is closed under pullbacks which are preserved by $\dagger$.

Remark 1.3. A class of $\dagger$-closed morphism which is closed under pullback is an admissible structure defining a geometry in the sense of Lurie’s DAG.

Theorem (Formally étale subslices are coreflecive) 1.4. Let $C/X$ be a slice of $C$. The full sub-$(\infty,1)$-category $(C/X)_\dagger\stackrel{\iota}{\hookrightarrow} C/X$ on those morphisms into $X$ which are $\dagger$-closed is reflective and coreflective; i.e. $\iota$ fits into an adjoint triple

In particular $C_\dagger:=(C/*)_\dagger\hookrightarrow C$ is reflective and coreflective.

Example (Π inf\mathbf{\Pi}_inf-closed morphism) 1.5. Let $H$ be a cohesive $(\infty,1)$-topos equipped with infinitesimal cohesion

Then the class of formally étale morphisms in $H$ equals the class of $\mathbf{\Pi}_inf:=i_*i^*$-closed morphisms in $H_th$ which happen to lie in $H$.

Theorem 1.6. For the classs $E$ of $\mathbf{\Pi}_inf$-closed morphisms in $C$ we have in addition to the above closure properties also the following ones:

(1) If in a pullback square in $C$ the left arrow is in $E$ and the bottom arrow is an effective epimorphism, then the right arrow is in $E$.

(2) Every morphism $D\to *$ from a discrete object to the terminal object is in $E$.

(3) $E$ is closed under colimit (taken in the arrow category).

(4) $E$ is closed under forming diagonals.

Definition (Π inf\mathbf{\Pi}_inf-closed object) 1.7. An object of $H$ is called formally étale object if there is a formally étale (effective) epimorphism (called atlas) from a $0$-truncated object into $X$.

Theorem (De Rham theorem for formally étale objects) 1.8. The de Rham theorem holds for any formally étale object for which the de Rham theorem holds level-wise in regard to the Cech nerve induced from the atlas.

Definition (Cover, Atlas) 2.1. Let $U\to X$ be a morphism of an $(\infty,1)$-category.

(1) We call $U\to X$ a cover of $X$ if it is an effective epimorphism.

(2) We call $U\to X$ a relative cover wrt. a class $M$ of morphisms if its pullback along every morphism in $M$ is a cover of $U$ and lies in $M$.

(3) We call $U\to X$ a $n$-atlas of $X$, if it is a cover and $U$ is $n$-truncated. A $0$-atlas we call just an atlas.

Theorem (Hausdorff manifold) 2.2. (1) $X$ is a paracompact if there is a jointly epimorphic set of monomorphisms $\phi_i:\mathbb{R}^n\to X$ such that the corresponding Cech groupoid $\zeta_\phi$ is degree-wise a coproduct of copies of $\mathbb{R}^n$.

(2) $X$ is hausdorff if $\zeta_\phi$ is moreover étale.

Definition (UU-modelled ∞\infty-manifold) 2.3.

Definition (κ\kappa-compact object, κ\kappa-compact cover, relatively κ\kappa-compact atlas) 2.4. Let $C$ be an $(\infty,1)$-category. Let $U\to X$ be a morphism.

(1) $U$ is called $\kappa$-compact if $C(X,-)$ preserves $\kappa$-filtered colimits.

(2) $U\to X$ is called $\kappa$-compact cover if it is a cover and $U$ is $\kappa$-compact.

(3) $U\to X$ is called relative $\kappa$-compact cover if it is a relative cover wrt. all morphisms with $\kappa$-compact domain.

Remark 2.5. The class of relative $\kappa$-compact covers is closed under composition, pullbacks, and contains all isomorphisms.

Definition (∞\infty-orbifold) 2.6. An $\infty$-orbifold is defined to be a groupoid object in $H$ posessing a relative $\kappa$-compact atlas which is also $\mathbf{\Pi}_inf$-closed.

Corollary (De Rham theorem for ∞\infty-orbifolds) 2.7.

Observation (Inertia ∞\infty-orbifold) 2.8.

Lemma 3.1.

Theorem (Classical étale groupoids) 3.2.

Theorem (Formally étale ∞\infty-groupoids are étale simplicial manifolds) 3.3.