nLab
A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - A-equivariant cohomology

cohomology

special and general types

variants

operations

Edit this sidebar


higher algebra

Ingredients

Contents

Edit this sidebar

This is a sub-entry of

see there for background and context.

This entry contains a basic introduction to getting equivariant cohomology from derived group schemes.

Previous:

Next:

the following are rough unpolished notes taken more or less verbatim from some seminar talk – needs attention, meaning: somebody should go through this and polish


Contents

Derived Elliptic Curves

Definition A derived elliptic curve over an (affine) derived scheme SpecA is a commutative derived group scheme (CDGS) E/A such that E¯Specπ 0A is an elliptic curve.

Let A be an E -ring. Let E(A) denote the -groupoid of oriented elliptic curves over SpecA. Note that E(A) is in particular a space (we will return to this point later).

The point is to prove the following due to Lurie.

Theorem The functor AE(A) is representable by a derived Deligne-Mumford stack Der=(,O ). Further, is equivalent to the topos underlying 1,1 and π 0O =O 1,1. Also, restricting to discrete rings, O provides a lift in sense of Hopkins and Miller.

G-Equivariant A-cohomology

The Strategy

  1. Define A S 1(*);

  2. Extend to A S 1(X) where X is a trivial S 1-space;

  3. Define A T(X) where T is a compact abelian Lie group where X is again a trivial T-space;

  4. Extend to A T(X) for any (finite enough) T-space;

  5. Define A G(X) for G any compact Lie group.

S 1-equivariance

To accomplish (1) we need a map

σ:SpfA P G\sigma : \mathrm{Spf} A^{\mathbb{C} P^\infty} \to \mathbf{G}

over SpecA. Then we can define A S 1(*)=O(G). Such a map arises from a completion map

A S 1A P A_{S^1} \to A^{\mathbb{C}P^\infty}

which we may interpret as a preorientation σMap(BS 1,G(A)). Recall that such a map σ is an orientation if the induced map to the formal completion of G is an isomorphism.

Recall two facts:

  1. There is a bijection {BS 1G(A)}{SpfA BS 1G};

  2. Orientations of the multiplicative group G m associated to A are in bijection with maps of E -rings {KA}, where K is the K-theory spectrum.

Theorem We can define equivariant A-cohomology using G m if and only if A is a K-algebra.

The Abelian Lie Group Case for a Point

Fix G/A oriented. Now let T be a compact abelian Lie group. We construct a commutative derived group scheme M T over A whose global sections give A T which is equipped with an appropriate completion map.

Definition Define the Pontryagin dual, T̂ of T by T̂:=Hom Lie(T,S 1).

Examples

  1. T=T n, the n-fold torus. Then T̂= n as

    T̂(θ 1,,θ n)(k 1θ 1,,k nθ n).\hat T \ni ( \theta_1 , \dots , \theta_n ) \mapsto (k_1 \theta_1 , \dots , k_n \theta_n ).
  2. If T={e}, then T̂=T.

Pontryagin Duality If T is an abelian, locally compact topological group then T̂̂T.

Definition Let B be an A-algebra. Define M T by

M T(B):=Hom AbTop(T̂,G(B)).M_T (B) := \mathrm{Hom}_\mathrm{AbTop} (\hat T , \mathbf{G} (B)).

Further, M T is representable.

Examples

  1. M S 1(B)=Hom(,G(B))=G(B).

  2. M T n=G× SpecA× SpecAG.

  3. M /n=hker(×n:GG).

  4. M {e}(B)=Hom({e},G(B)={e}, so M {e} is final over SpecA, hence it is isomorphic to SpecA.

How do we get a completion map σ T:BTM T(A) for all T given an orientation σ S 1:BS 1G(A)? By a composition: define

Bev:BTHom(T̂,BS 1),p(fBf(p))Bev: BT \to \mathrm{Hom}(\hat T , BS^1), \; p \mapsto (f \mapsto Bf(p))

then define

σ T:=σ S 1Bev.\sigma_T := \sigma_{S^1} \circ Bev.

Proposition There exists a map M̂ such that the assignment TM T factors as TM̂(BT). That is the functor M factors through the category of classifying spaces of compact Abelian Lie groups B(CALG) (considered as orbifolds). Further, such factorizations are in bijection with the preorientations of G.

Proof. That such a factorization exists defines M̂ on objects. Now by choosing a base point in BT we have

Hom(BT,BT)BT×Hom(T,T)\mathrm{Hom} (BT , BT' ) \simeq BT' \times \mathrm{Hom} (T, T')

as spaces. Now we need a map

BTHom(M T,M T).BT' \to \mathrm{Hom} (M_T , M_{T'}) .

Because this map must be functorial in T and T we can restrict to the universal case where T is trivial and then

BTHom(M {e},M T)=M T(A)BT' \to \mathrm{Hom} ( M_{\{e\}} , M_{T'} ) = M_{T'} (A)

is just a preorientation σ T.

The Abelian Case for General Spaces

We will see that A T(X) is the global sections of a quasi-coherent sheaf on M T.

Theorem Let G be preoriented and X a finite T-CW complex. There exist a unique family of functors {F T} from finite T-spaces to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on M T such that

  1. F T maps T-equivariant (weak) homotopy equivalences to equivalence of quasi-coherent sheaves;

  2. F T maps finite homotopy colimits to finite homotopy limits of quasi-coherent sheaves;

  3. F T(*)=O(M G);

  4. If TT and X=(X×T)/T then F T(X)f *(F T(X)), where f:M TM T is the induced map;

  5. The F T are compatible under finite chains of inclusions of subgroups TTT.

Proof. Use (2) to reduce to the case where X is a T-equivariant cell, i.e. X=T/T 0×D k for some subgroup T 0T. Use (1) to reduce to the case where X=T/T 0. Use (3) to conclude that F T(T/T 0)=f *F T 0(*). Finally, (4) implies that F T 0(*)=M̂(*/T 0), where M̂ is specified by the preorientation.

For trivial actions there is no dependence on the preorientation.

Remark

  1. F T(X) is actually a sheaf of algebras.

  2. If X,Y are T-spaces then we have maps

    F T(X)F T(X×Y)F T(Y)F_T (X) \to F_T (X \times Y) \leftarrow F_T (Y)

    and

    F T(X)F T(Y)F T(X×Y).F_T (X) \otimes F_T (Y) \to F_T (X \times Y).
  3. Define relative version for X 0X by

    F T(X,X 0)=hker(F T(X)F T(X 0))F_T (X, X_0 ) = hker (F_T (X) \to F_T (X_0 ))

    and for all T-spaces Y we have a map

    F T(X,X 0) AF T(Y)F T(X×Y,X 0×Y).F_T (X, X_0 ) \otimes_{A} F_T (Y) \to F_T (X \times Y , X_0 \times Y).

Definition A T(X)=Γ(F T(X)) as an E -ring (algebra).

We now verify loop maps on A T.

Recall that in the classical setting A n(X) is represented by a space Z n and we have suspension maps Z 0(S nZ n). Now we need to consider all possible T-equivariant deloopings, that is T-maps from S nZ n.

Theorem Let G be oriented, V a finite dimensional unitary representation of T. Denote by SVBV the unit sphere inside of the unit ball. Define L V=F T(BV,SV). Then

  1. L V is a line bundle on M T, i.e. invertible;

  2. For all (finite) T-spaces X the map

L VF T(X)F T(X×BV,X×SV)L_V \otimes F_T (X) \to F_T (X \times BV, X \times SV)

is an isomorphism.

Proof for T=S 1=U(1) and V=. Then

L V=hker(F T(BV)F T(SV)).L_V = hker ( F_T (BV) \to F_T (SV)) .

As BV is contractible F T(BV)=O(G) and by property (3) above F T(SV)=f *(O(SpecA)) for f:SpecAG is the identity section. As G is oriented, π 0G/π 0SpecA is smooth of relative dimension 1, so L V can be though of as the invertible sheaf of ideals defining the identity section of G.

Suppose V and V are representations of T then L VL VL VV is an equivalence. So if W is a virtual representation (i.e. W=UU) then L W=L U(L U) 1.

Definition Let V be a virtual representation of T and define

A T V(X)=π 0Γ(F T(X)L V 1).A_T^V (X) = \pi_0 \Gamma (F_T (X) \otimes L_V^{-1}) .

The point is that in order to define equivariant cohomology requires functors A G W for all representations of G, not just the trivial ones. In the derived setting we obtain this once we have an orientation of G.

The Non-Abelian Lie Group Case

Let A be an E -ring, G an orientated commutative derived group scheme over SpecA, and T a (not necessarily Abelian) compact Lie group.

Theorem There exists a functor A T from (finite?) T-spaces to Spectra which is uniquely characterized by the following.

  1. A T preserves equivalence;

  2. For T 0T, A T 0(X)=A T((X×G)/T 0);

  3. A T maps homotopy colimits to homotopy limits;

  4. If T is Abelian, then A T is defined as above;

  5. For all spaces X the map

A T(X)A T(X×E abT)A_T (X) \to A_T (X \times E^{ab} T)

where E abT is a T-space characterized by the requirement that for all Abelian subgroups T 0T, (E abT) T 0 is contractible and empty for T 0 not Abelian. Further, for Borel equivariant cohomology we require

  1. If T={e}, then A T(X)=A(X)=A X;

  2. A T(X)A T(X×ET) is an isomorphism.

Proof. In the case of ordinary equivariant cohomology we can use property (5) to reduce to the case where X has only Abelian stabilizer groups. Then via (3) we reduce to X being a colimit of T-equivariant cells D k×T/T 0 for T 0 Abelian. Via homotopy equivalence (1) we reduce to X=T/T 0. Using property (2) we see A T(X)=A T 0(*), so (4) yields A T 0(*)=M̂(*/T 0)