nLab
adjoints preserve (co-)limits
Contents
Context
Category theory
Limits and colimits
limits and colimits
1-Categorical
limit and colimit
limits and colimits by example
commutativity of limits and colimits
small limit
filtered colimit
sifted colimit
connected limit , wide pullback
preserved limit , reflected limit , created limit
product , fiber product , base change , coproduct , pullback , pushout , cobase change , equalizer , coequalizer , join , meet , terminal object , initial object , direct product , direct sum
finite limit
Kan extension
weighted limit
end and coend
fibered limit
2-Categorical
(β,1)-Categorical
Model-categorical
Contents
Idea
One of the basic facts of category theory is that left /right adjoint functors preserves co /limits , respectively.
Statement
Proposition
Let π \mathcal{C} and π \mathcal{D} be two categories and let
( L β£ R ) : π β₯ βΆ R β΅ L π
(L \dashv R)
\;\colon\;
\mathcal{C}
\underoverset
{\underset{R}{\longrightarrow}}
{\overset{L}{\longleftarrow}}
{\bot}
\mathcal{D}
be a pair of adjoint functors between them.
Then
If X : β β π X \colon \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C} is a diagram whose limit lim β΅ i X i \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_{i} X_i exists in π \mathcal{C} , then this limit is preserved by the right adjoint R R in that there is a natural isomorphism
R ( lim β΅ i ( X i ) ) β lim β΅ i ( R ( X i ) ) ,
R
\left(
\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(X_i\right)
\right)
\;\simeq\;
\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left( R(X_i) \right)
\,,
where on the right we have the limit in π \mathcal{D} over the diagram R β X : β βΆ X π βΆ R π R \circ X \colon \mathcal{I} \overset{X}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{C} \overset{R}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{D} .
If X : β β π X \colon \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{D} is a diagram whose colimit lim βΆ i X i \underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_{i} X_i exists in π \mathcal{D} , then this colimit is preserved by the left adjoint L L in that there is a natural isomorphism
L ( lim βΆ i ( X i ) ) β lim βΆ i ( L ( X i ) ) ,
L
\left(
\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_i \left(X_i\right)
\right)
\;\simeq\;
\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_i \left( L(X_i) \right)
\,,
where on the right we have the colimit in π \mathcal{C} over the diagram L β X : β βΆ X π βΆ L π L \circ X \colon \mathcal{I} \overset{X}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{D} \overset{L}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{C} .
Proof
We show the first statement, the proof of the second is formally dual .
We use the following facts
There is a natural isomorphism , Hom π ( L ( d ) , c ) β Hom π ( d , R ( c ) ) Hom_{\mathcal{C}}(L(d),c) \simeq Hom_{\mathcal{D}}(d,R(c)) ; this equivalently characterizes the fact that ( L β£ R ) (L \dashv R) is a pair of adjoint functors ;
(hom-functor preserves limits ) The hom-functor sends colimits in the first argument and limits in the second argument to limits of hom-sets
Hom ( X , lim β΅ i X i ) β lim β΅ i Hom ( X , X i )
Hom\left( X, \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right)
\simeq
\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i Hom\left(X,X_i\right)
and
Hom ( lim βΆ i X i , X ) β lim β΅ ( Hom ( X i , X ) ) .
Hom\left(\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_i X_i, X\right)
\simeq
\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} \left(Hom\left(X_i,X\right) \right)
\,.
Again, this is essentially by definition of limits /colimits .
(Yoneda lemma ) If for two objects X X and Y Y in some category the hom-sets out of or into these objects (their representable functors ) are naturally isomorphic , then the two objects are isomorphic, and the isomorphism is obtained by βfollowing the identityβ along the natural isomorphisms.
Now using the first two items, we obtain the following chain of natural isomorphisms , for every object Y β π Y \in \mathcal{D} :
Hom π ( Y , R ( lim β΅ i X i ) ) β Hom π ( L ( Y ) , lim β΅ i X i ) β lim β΅ i ( Hom π ( L ( Y ) , X i ) ) β lim β΅ i ( Hom π ( Y , R ( X i ) ) ) β Hom π ( Y , lim β΅ i ( R ( X i ) ) ) .
\begin{aligned}
Hom_{\mathcal{D}}\left( Y, R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \right)
& \simeq
Hom_{\mathcal{C}}\left( L(Y), \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i\right)
\\
& \simeq
\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left( Hom_{\mathcal{C}}\left(L\left(Y\right), X_i\right)\right)
\\
& \simeq
\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(Hom_{\mathcal{D}}\left(Y, R\left(X_i\right)\right)\right)
\\
& \simeq
Hom_{\mathcal{D}}\left(Y, \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(R\left(X_i\right) \right) \right)
\end{aligned}
\,.
This implies that R ( lim β΅ i X i ) β
lim β΅ i ( R ( X i ) ) R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \cong \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(R\left(X_i\right) \right) , but to show R R preserves the limit we also need that the isomorphism is given by the βcanonical mapβ R ( lim β΅ i X i ) β lim β΅ i ( R ( X i ) ) R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \to \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(R\left(X_i\right) \right) given by the universal property. Luckily, we can deduce this simply by following the identity R ( lim β΅ i X i ) β R ( lim β΅ i X i ) R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \to R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) through the chain of natural isomorphisms - naturality of the adjunction implies that the final map we obtain is indeed the canonical map, as required.
Last revised on April 13, 2026 at 16:52:15.
See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.