nLab adjoints preserve (co-)limits

Contents

Context

Category theory

Limits and colimits

Contents

Idea

One of the basic facts of category theory is that left/right adjoint functors preserves co/limits, respectively.

Statement

Proposition

Let π’ž\mathcal{C} and π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} be two categories and let

(L⊣R):π’žβŠ₯⟢R⟡Lπ’Ÿ (L \dashv R) \;\colon\; \mathcal{C} \underoverset {\underset{R}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{L}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathcal{D}

be a pair of adjoint functors between them.

Then

  1. If X:β„β†’π’žX \colon \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C} is a diagram whose limit lim⟡ iX i\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_{i} X_i exists in π’ž\mathcal{C}, then this limit is preserved by the right adjoint RR in that there is a natural isomorphism

    R(lim⟡ i(X i))≃lim⟡ i(R(X i)), R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(X_i\right) \right) \;\simeq\; \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left( R(X_i) \right) \,,

    where on the right we have the limit in π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} over the diagram R∘X:β„βŸΆXπ’žβŸΆRπ’ŸR \circ X \colon \mathcal{I} \overset{X}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{C} \overset{R}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{D}.

  2. If X:β„β†’π’ŸX \colon \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{D} is a diagram whose colimit lim⟢ iX i\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_{i} X_i exists in π’Ÿ\mathcal{D}, then this colimit is preserved by the left adjoint LL in that there is a natural isomorphism

    L(lim⟢ i(X i))≃lim⟢ i(L(X i)), L \left( \underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_i \left(X_i\right) \right) \;\simeq\; \underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_i \left( L(X_i) \right) \,,

    where on the right we have the colimit in π’ž\mathcal{C} over the diagram L∘X:β„βŸΆXπ’ŸβŸΆLπ’žL \circ X \colon \mathcal{I} \overset{X}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{D} \overset{L}{\longrightarrow} \mathcal{C}.

Proof

We show the first statement, the proof of the second is formally dual.

We use the following facts

  1. There is a natural isomorphism, Hom π’ž(L(d),c)≃Hom π’Ÿ(d,R(c))Hom_{\mathcal{C}}(L(d),c) \simeq Hom_{\mathcal{D}}(d,R(c)); this equivalently characterizes the fact that (L⊣R)(L \dashv R) is a pair of adjoint functors;

  2. (hom-functor preserves limits) The hom-functor sends colimits in the first argument and limits in the second argument to limits of hom-sets

    Hom(X,lim⟡ iX i)≃lim⟡ iHom(X,X i) Hom\left( X, \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \simeq \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i Hom\left(X,X_i\right)

    and

    Hom(lim⟢ iX i,X)≃lim⟡(Hom(X i,X)). Hom\left(\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}_i X_i, X\right) \simeq \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} \left(Hom\left(X_i,X\right) \right) \,.

    Again, this is essentially by definition of limits/colimits.

  3. (Yoneda lemma) If for two objects XX and YY in some category the hom-sets out of or into these objects (their representable functors) are naturally isomorphic, then the two objects are isomorphic, and the isomorphism is obtained by β€œfollowing the identity” along the natural isomorphisms.

Now using the first two items, we obtain the following chain of natural isomorphisms, for every object Yβˆˆπ’ŸY \in \mathcal{D}:

Hom π’Ÿ(Y,R(lim⟡ iX i)) ≃Hom π’ž(L(Y),lim⟡ iX i) ≃lim⟡ i(Hom π’ž(L(Y),X i)) ≃lim⟡ i(Hom π’Ÿ(Y,R(X i))) ≃Hom π’Ÿ(Y,lim⟡ i(R(X i))). \begin{aligned} Hom_{\mathcal{D}}\left( Y, R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \right) & \simeq Hom_{\mathcal{C}}\left( L(Y), \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i\right) \\ & \simeq \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left( Hom_{\mathcal{C}}\left(L\left(Y\right), X_i\right)\right) \\ & \simeq \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(Hom_{\mathcal{D}}\left(Y, R\left(X_i\right)\right)\right) \\ & \simeq Hom_{\mathcal{D}}\left(Y, \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(R\left(X_i\right) \right) \right) \end{aligned} \,.

This implies that R(lim⟡ iX i)β‰…lim⟡ i(R(X i))R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \cong \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(R\left(X_i\right) \right), but to show RR preserves the limit we also need that the isomorphism is given by the β€œcanonical map” R(lim⟡ iX i)β†’lim⟡ i(R(X i))R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \to \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i \left(R\left(X_i\right) \right) given by the universal property. Luckily, we can deduce this simply by following the identity R(lim⟡ iX i)β†’R(lim⟡ iX i)R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) \to R \left( \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_i X_i \right) through the chain of natural isomorphisms - naturality of the adjunction implies that the final map we obtain is indeed the canonical map, as required.

Last revised on April 13, 2026 at 16:52:15. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.