A topos may be thought of as a generalized topological space. Accordingly, the notions of
locally -connected space
locally -connected space
have analogs for toposes, (n,1)-toposes and (∞,1)-toposes
locally simply connected (2,1)-topos?
locally -connected -topos
locally -connected -topos
The numbering mismatch is traditional from topology; see n-connected space. It reads a bit better if we say locally -simply connected for locally -connected, since locally -(simply) connected is locally simply connected, but being locally -simply connected is still a property of an -topos.
A (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-topos is called locally -connected if the (essentially unique) global section (∞,1)-geometric morphism
extends to an essential geometric morphism -geometric morphism, i.e. there is a further left adjoint
If in addition preserves the terminal object we say that is an ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
If preserves even all finite (∞,1)-products we say that is a strongly ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
If preserves even all finite (∞,1)-limits we say that is a totally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
In (Lurie, section A.1) this is called an -topos of locally constant shape.
For a locally -connected -topos and an object, we call ∞Grpd the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos of . The (categorical) homotopy groups of are called the geometric homotopy groups of
Similarly we have:
For an -topos is called locally -connected if the (essentially unique) global section geometric morphism is has an extra left adjoint.
For this reproduces the case of a locally connected topos.
The follow proposition gives a large supply of examples.
Let be a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site/∞-connected (∞,1)-site. Then the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves is a locally -connected -topos.
See locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site/∞-connected (∞,1)-site for the proof.
In (SimpsonTeleman, prop. 2.18) is stated essentially what the above proposition asserts at the level of homotopy categories: if has contractible objects, then there exists a left adjoint .
This includes the following examples.
The sites CartSp are locally -connected. The corresponding -toposes are the cohesive (∞,1)-toposes ETop∞Grpd, Smooth∞Grpd and SynthDiff∞Grpd.
For a locally contractible space, such that is hypercomplete, is a locally -connected -topos.
The full subcategory of the category of open subsets on the contractible subsets is another site of definition for . And it is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site.
For a locally contractible topological space we have that the fundamental ∞-groupoid of a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos computes the correct homotopy type of :
the image of as the terminal object in under the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos-functor
is equivalent to the ordinary fundamental ∞-groupoid given by the singular simplicial complex
By using the presentations of by the model structure on simplicial presheaves as discussed at locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site one finds that this boils down to the old Artin-Mazur theorem. More on this at geometric homotopy groups in an (∞,1)-topos.
For a locally -connected -topos, also all its objects are locally -connected, in that their petit over-(∞,1)-toposes are locally -connected.
The two notions of fundamental -groupoids of induced this way do agree, in that there is a natural equivalence
By the general facts recalled at etale geometric morphism we have a composite essential geometric morphism
and is given by sending to .
If in the above is contractible in that then is even an ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
By the discussion there we need to check that preserves the terminal object:
Let be an -topos and a collection of objects such that
the canonical morphism out of their coproduct to the terminal object is an effective epimorphism;
all the slice-(∞,1)-toposes are locally -connected.
Then also itself is locally -connected.
This appears as (Lurie, corollary A.1.7).
For a locally -connected -topos, its underlying (1,1)-topos is a locally connected topos. Moreover, if is strongly connected (the extra left adjoint preserves finite products), then so is .
The global sections geometric morphism is given by homming out of the terminal object and hence preserves 0-truncated objects by definition. Also, by the -adjunction so does : for every and every we have
Therefore by essential uniqueness of adjoints the restriction has a left adjoint given by
Finally, by the discussion here, preserves finite limits. Hence does so if does.
The fact that the terminal geometric morphism is essential gives rise to various induced structures of interest. For instance it induces a notion of
For a more exhaustive list of extra structures see cohesive (∞,1)-topos.
locally connected topos / locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos
and
Some discussion of the homotopy category of locally -connected -toposes is around proposition 2.18 of
Under the term locally constant shape the notion appears in section A.1 of
See also
For related references see
Last revised on July 1, 2024 at 13:01:30. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.