Showing changes from revision #14 to #15:
Added | Removed | Changed
Let be a space (an object of a category of spaces), let be the category of sheaves on the frame of opens on , let denote the wide subcategory of with only étale morphisms. Then there is an adjoint equivalence
where
sends an étale morphism to the sheaf of local sections of .
sends a sheaf on to its espace étale.
We wish to clarify in which sense also the - topos can be regarded as an -sheaftopos on . One formulation of this is to show that is a locally representable structured -topos - and that the representation is exhibited by formally étale morphisms.
We assume that is the admissible class defined by an infinitesimal modality on .
(1) A -structure on an -topos is called universal if for every -topos composition with induces an equivalence of -categories if
where denotes the geometric morphisms with inverse image .
(2) In this case we say exhibits as classifying -topos for -structures on .
, , and are -structured -toposes.
The classifying topos for -structures is and the -toposes in question are linked with by geometric morphisms. We obtain the required structures as the image of
respectively for and in place of “H/X”.
Let be an -category. We have . A pro object in in is a formal limit of a cofiltered diagram in . A cofiltered diagram is defined to be a finite diagram having a cone (i.e. a family of natural transformation for all , where denotes the constant functor having value ). So we have
and the hom sets are
We have (more or less) synonyms:
pro object, cofiltered, having a cone
ind object, filtered, having a cocone
(1) A morphisms is called étale if (1a) the underlying geometric morphism of -toposes is étale and (1b) the induced map is an equivalence in
(2) Condition (1b) is equivalent to the requirement that is -cocartesian for the projection.
(3) Being an étale geometric morphism of structured -toposes is a local property:
If there is an effective epimorphism to the terminal object of , and in a morphism such that
is étale, then is étale.
Let be a structured -topos, let be an object.
(1) The restriction of to is defined to be the slice .
(2) The restriction of to is defined to be composite
where is base change along .
Let be a morphism of geometries. Let the restriction functor.
(1) Then there is an adjunction
where the left adjoint is called a relative spectrum functor.
(2) Let now be the discrete geometry underlying . Then
is called absolute spectrum functor; here denotes the inclusion of the ind objects of .
A -structured (∞,1)-topos is called locally representable (aka a -scheme) if
such that
the cover in that the canonical morphism (with the terminal object of ) is an effective epimorphism;
for every there exists an equivalence
of structured -toposes for some (in the (∞,1)-category of pro-objects in ). In other words is assumed to be locally equivalent to an absolute spectrum (aka affine scheme) of a pro object in .
If is a structured topos and is an restriction thereof, then is an étale morphism of structured toposes.
There exists a is locally representable -structure -structured on such that is a locally representable -structured -topos.
The terminal object in has to satisfy is the identity on . The collection of all formally étale effective epimorphisms (in ) with codomain covers and hence the cover in the slice. This follows from HTT Remark 6.2.3.6.
We know that is a reflective- and coreflective subcategory of . is a geometric morphism. Hence we can choose to be a left adjoint which preserves effective epimorphisms.
is left exact
For every collection of admissible (i.e. formally étale) morphisms in which generate a covering sieve on , the induced map is an effective epimorphism in .
Let The terminal object in be is an element of the cover; i.e. a formally étale effective epimorphism . Hence the identity on . is The a collection cover of all formally étale effective epimorphisms (in . ) with codomain covers . By HTT Remark 6.2.3.6. they cover in the slice. This follows from
The Now restriction we choose to be the composit of base change is along given by: (this functor is exact) followed by the coreflector (that we have a coreflector is shown (reference)) (this functor is right adjoint and hence left exact). In total is left exact and since our cover consists only of formally étale morphisms and hence preserve the cover.
Objects of are cocones where is formally étale. Morphisms are pyramids with four faces and tip .
The restriction of the -structure is given as follows:
Now we show that is locally equivalent to an absolute spectrum:
Let be an element of the cover; i.e. a formally étale effective epimorphism .
where The restriction is of base change along . Pro to objects in are is cofiltered given diagrams by: in or -equivalently filtered diagrams in
Objects of are cocones where is formally étale. Morphisms are pyramids with four faces and tip .
The restriction of the -structure is given as follows:
where is base change along . Pro objects in are cofiltered diagrams in or -equivalently filtered diagrams in