Let be some base field. We start with the constant group scheme defined by some classical group which gives in every component just the group . Next we visit the notion of étale group scheme. This is not itself constant but becomes so by scalar extension to the separable closure of . The importance of étale affine is that the category of them is equivalent to that of Galois modules by
So far these examples ‘’do nothing’‘ with the (multiplicative and additive) structure of the ring in which we evaluate our group scheme. But the next instances do this: We define the additive- and the multiplicative group scheme by and sending a -ring to to its underlying additive- and multiplicative group, respectively. These have the ‘’function rings’‘ and and since we note that our basic building blocks and are in fact representable -functors aka. affine group schemes. We observe that we have and call in generalization of this property any group scheme satisfying multiplicative group scheme. (We could have also the idea to call satisfying ‘’additive’‘ but I didn’t see this.) By some computation of the hom spaces involving co- and birings we see that these are again always values of a representable -functor ; this functor we call the Cartier dual of . If for example is a finite group scheme also is, and moreover is a contravariant autoequivalence (’‘duality’’) of ; in general it is also a duality in some specific sense. By taking the Cartier dual of a constant group scheme we obtain the notion of a diagonlizable group scheme. To justify this naming we compute some value where denotes the group algebra of and the last isomorphism is due to the universal property of group rings; we observe that the last equality tells us that and recall that a is called a character of (and one calls a group generated by these ‘’diagonalizable’’). Revisiting the condition by which we defined multiplicative group schemes and considering a group scheme satisfying this condition for all sub group-schemes of we arrive at the notion of unipotent group scheme. By the structure theorem of decomposition of affine groups we can proof that is unipotent iff the completion of group schemes (which gives us-by the usual technic of completion- a formal (group) scheme if is a group scheme) of the Cartier dual of , i.e. is a connected formal group scheme also called local group scheme since a local group scheme is defined to be the spectrum of a local ring; this requirement in turn is equivalent to hence the first name ‘’connected’’. There is also a connection between connected and étale schemes: For any formal group scheme there is an essentially unique exact sequence where is connected and is étale. Such decomposition in exact sequences we obtain in further cases: where
-group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
formal | connected | étale | p.34 | |
finite | infinitesimal | étale | splits if is perfect | p.35 |
affine | multiplicative | smooth? | is infinitesimal | p.43 |
where a smooth (group) scheme is defined to be the spectrum of a finite dimensional (over k) power series algebra, a (group) scheme is called finite (group) scheme if we restrict in all necessary definitions to -ring which are finite dimensional -vector spaces, and a (group) scheme is called infinitesimal (group) scheme if it is finite and local. If moreover is a perfect field any finite affine -group is in a unique way the product of four subgroups where is a formal étale multiplicative group, is a formal étale unipotent group, is a formal infinitesimal multiplicative group, and is a infinitesimal unipotent group.
If we now shift our focus to colimits- or more generally to codirected systems of finite group schemes, in particular the notion of p-divisible group is an extensively studied case because the -divisible group of a group scheme encodes information on the p-torsion of the group scheme . To appreciate the definition of we first recall that for any group scheme we have the relative Frobenius morphism to distinguish it from the absolute Frobenius morphism which is induced by the Frobenius morphism of the underlying ring . The passage to the relative Frobenius is necessary since in general it is not true that the absolute Frobenius respects the base scheme. Now we define where the kernel is taken of the Frobenius iterated -times and the codirected system
is then called the -divisible group of .
Recall that is the terminal object of .
is copowered (= tensored)? over . We define the constant -scheme on a set by
For a scheme we compute and see that there is an adjunction
This is just the constant-sheaf-global-section adjunction.
An étale -scheme is defined to be a directed colimit of -spectra of finite separable field-extensions of .
For an étal group scheme we have
(see also coalgebras, corings and birings in the theory of group shemes)
An affine -scheme is a representable object in .
We obtain a group law induced by if satisfies the dual axioms of a group object. We denote the structure maps called comultiplication, counit, and converse by
The additive group
The multiplicative group
The kernels of group homomorphisms. In particular the kernel .
A group scheme is called multiplicative group scheme if the following equivalent conditions are satisfied:
is diagonalizable.
is diagonalizable for a field .
is the Cartier dual of an étale -group.
is an étale -formal group.
(If , is an epimorphism
(If , is an isomorphism
Let dnote a constant group scheme, let be an étale group scheme. Then we have the following cartier duals:
is diagonalizable.