Context
Homotopy theory
Background
Variations
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Theorems
-topos theory
(∞,1)-topos theory
Background
Definitions
-
elementary (∞,1)-topos
-
(∞,1)-site
-
reflective sub-(∞,1)-category
-
(∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves
-
(∞,1)-topos
-
(n,1)-topos, n-topos
-
(∞,1)-quasitopos
-
(∞,2)-topos
-
(∞,n)-topos
Characterization
Morphisms
Extra stuff, structure and property
-
hypercomplete (∞,1)-topos
-
over-(∞,1)-topos
-
n-localic (∞,1)-topos
-
locally n-connected (n,1)-topos
-
structured (∞,1)-topos
-
locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos, ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos
-
local (∞,1)-topos
-
cohesive (∞,1)-topos
Models
Constructions
structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos
Contents
Idea
In abelian categories one talks of chain complexes; and in that context a composable pair is null iff factors through the cokernel :
\begin{array}{ccccc}
A & \to & B \\
\downarrow & & \downarrow & \searrow \\
0 & \to & B/(A) & \to & C
\end{array}
and so forth. In a strict context, the factorization is unique.
In a pointed (∞,1)-category with (∞,1)-colimits of small 1-truncated diagrams, one may still consider factorizations through cofibers: but now there is a choice to make, roughly parametrized by an action of . This leads to interesting structure, describing (with upper bounds!) how trivially a particular sequence of arrows may compose.
To begin, consider a sequence of maps . If the composites and are nulhomotopic, then one has a diagram
\begin{array}{ccccc}
A_0 & \to & A_1 & \to & * \\
\downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow \\
* & \to & A_2 & \to & A_3
\end{array}
any choice of homotopies in the two squares gives a map .
Preliminaries
Define and to be the cofibers of and , respectively. A choice of homotopy corresponds to a choice of factorization , which gives a diagram of pushout squares
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
A_0 & \to & A_1 & \to & * \\
\downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow \\
* & \to & C &\to & \Sigma A_0 & \to & *\\
& & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow \\
& & A_2 & \to & D & \to & C'
\end{array}
It is to be noted that the map and possibly the object depend on the choice of factor , but that does not, in any meaningful sense, so depend: this is just the structure map of the cofiber of . Note that the cofiber of is thus equivalent to that of ; but again the role of choices must be studied.
Definitions
A sequence of maps will be called a bracket sequence (a novel phrase for the purposes of this entry) in either of two cases:
- and the composites and are nulhomotopic; OR
- , and (using the preceding notations), there are choices of factor and such that the induced sequence is a bracket sequence.
In all cases, a bracket sequence leads to a three-map sequence
\Sigma^m A_0 \to D_m \to A_{m+2} \to A_{m+3}
in which consecutive maps compose trivially, and so there are induced choices of maps
\Sigma^{m+1} A_0 \to A_{m+3} .
The collection of all such maps, taking all compatible variations, is the Toda Bracket of the bracket sequence.
Among the bracket sequences, a particular family arises which here will be called null-bracket (again, a novel phrase). A sequence will be called null-bracket if
- and is trivial, OR
- , and there is a choice of factorization such that the sequence is null-bracket.
If the Toda bracket for a bracket sequence includes the trivial map then the sequence is null-bracket.
Applications
By definition, if a sequence is a bracket sequence AND NOT a null-bracket sequence, it follows that all the relevant maps are nontrivial. Things like these Toda brackets have been studied by many (FIXME: referrences later) and especially the length-three brackets used by H. Toda to describe most of for or so.
In (Cohen, 1968) is given a criterion for stable maps of spheres to inhabit non-null Toda brackets; this turns out to be most of , and furthermore the maps in the bracket sequences can be chosen from a very small set (_FIXME_: be more precise! degree maps , Hopf map?s , and … )
References
- Joel Cohen, The decomposition of stable homotopy, Annals of Mathematics (2) 87 (2): 305–320 (1968)
- Hans-Joachim Baues, On the cohomology of categories, universal Toda brackets and homotopy pairs, K-Theory 11:3, April 1997, pp. 259-285 (27) springer
- Boryana Dimitrova, Universal Toda brackets of commutative ring spectra, poster, Bonn 2010, pdf
- C. Roitzheim, S. Whitehouse, Uniqueness of -structures and Hochschild cohomology, arxiv/0909.3222
- Steffen Sagave, Universal Toda brackets of ring spectra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 360(5):2767-2808, 2008, math.KT/0611808