nLab
disjoint coproduct

Contents

Idea

The notion of disjoint coproduct is a generalization to arbitrary categories of that of disjoint union of sets.

One says that a coproduct X+Y of two objects X,Y in a category 𝒞 is disjoint if the intersection of X with Y in XY is empty. In this case one writes XYX+Y for the coproduct and speaks of the disjoint union of X with Y.

Definition

In a category

A coproduct a+b in a category is disjoint if

  1. the coprojections aa+b and ba+b are monic, and

  2. their intersection is an initial object.

Equivalently, this means we have pullback squares

a a b b 0 b a a+b b a+b a a+b\array{ a & \to & a &&& b & \to & b &&& 0 & \to & b\\ \downarrow && \downarrow &&& \downarrow && \downarrow &&& \downarrow && \downarrow \\ a & \to & a+b &&& b & \to & a+b &&& a & \to & a+b}

An arbitrary coproduct ia i is disjoint if each coprojection a i ia i is monic and the intersection of any two is initial. Note that every 0-ary coproduct (that, is initial object) is disjoint.

In a bicategory

Properties

Characterization of extensivity and of sheaf toposes

A category having all finitary disjoint coproducts is half of the condition for a category to be extensive.

Having all small disjoint coproducts is one of the conditions in Giraud's theorem characterizing sheaf toposes.

In coherent categories

Proposition

Let 𝒞 be a coherent category. If X,YZ are two subobjects of some object Z𝒞 and are disjoint, in that their intersection in Z is empty, XY, then their union XY is their (disjoint) coproduct.

This apears as (Johnstone, cor. A1.4.4).

Definition

A coherent category in which all coproducts are disjoint is also called a positive coherent category.

(Johnstone, p. 34)

Example

Every extensive category is in particular positive, by definition.

In a positive coherent category, every morphism into a coproduct factors through the coproduct coprojections:

Proposition

Let 𝒞 be a postive coherent category, def. 1, and let f:AXY be a morphism. Then the two subobjects f *(X)A and f *(Y)Y of A, being the pullbacks in

f *(X) X i X A f XYf *(Y) Y i Y A f XY\array{ f^* (X) &\to& X \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{i_X}} \\ A &\stackrel{f}{\to}& X \coprod Y } \;\;\;\; \array{ f^* (Y) &\to& Y \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{i_Y}} \\ A &\stackrel{f}{\to}& X \coprod Y }

are disjoint in A and A is their disjoint coproduct

Af *(X)f *(Y).A \simeq f^*(X) \coprod f^*(Y) \,.

This appears in (Johnstone, p. 34).

Remark

This means that if A𝒞 itself is indecomposable in that it is not a coproduct of two objects in a non-trivial way, for instance if 𝒞 is an extensive category and A𝒞 is a connected object, then every morphism AXY into a disjoint coproduct factors through one of the two canonical inclusions.

References

For instance page 34 in section A1.4.4 in

Revised on November 8, 2012 12:58:01 by Urs Schreiber (82.169.65.155)