FQFT and cohomology
Types of quantum field thories
While fundamental physics is at some level well described by quantum field theory, a typical Lagrangian used to define such a QFT can reasonably be expected to define only degrees of freedom and interactions that are relevant up to some given energy scale. In this perspective one speaks of the theory as being the effective quantum field theory of some – possibly known but possibly unspecified – more fundamental theory.
An example (historically the first to be successfully considered) is the Fermi theory of beta decay of hadrons: this contains interactions of four fermions at a time, for instance a process in which a neutron decays into a collection consisting of a proton, an electron and a neutrino. Later it was discovered that, more fundamentally, this is not a single reaction but is composed out of several other interactions that involve exchanges of W-bosons between these four particles. Nevertheless, Fermi’s original effective theory made very precise predictions at energy scales less than 10 MeV?. The reason is that the -boson has mass several orders of magnitude higher than that (about 80 GeV) and was thus effectively invisible at these low energies.
In the perspective of effective field theory notably unrenormalizable Lagrangians can still make perfect sense as effective theories and give rise to well defined predictions: they can be effective approximations to renormalizable or even degreewise finite more fundamental theories. This is sometimes called a UV completion of the given effective theory.
For instance gravity – which is notoriously non-renormalizable – makes perfect sense as an effective field theory (see for instance the introduction in (Donoghue). It is in principle possible that there is some more fundamental theory with plenty of excitations at high energies that is however degreewise finite in perturbation theory, whose effective description at low energy is given by the unrenormalizable Einstein-Hilbert action. (For instance, string theory is meant to be such a theory.)
The technique of effective field theory is based on the following fact:
For a given set of asymptotic states, perturbation theory with the most general Lagrangian containing all terms allowed by the assumed symmetries will yield the most general S-matrix elements consistent with analyticity, perturbative unitarity?, cluster decomposition and the assumed symmetries.
Based on this fact, one obtains an effective approximation to a given more fundamental theory (which may or may not be actually known) by
choosing the (sub)set of fields to be considered;
writing down a Lagrangian
that contains all the possible polynomial interaction terms of these fields scaled by their expected/known energy scale , up to a maximal energy scale
(this will in general contain lots of direct interaction that in the fundamental theory are really compound interactions)
finally one fixes all the coupling constants of all these interactions by
either deriving them from a known fundamental theory by integrating out higher energy effects in that theory;
or, otherwise, measuring them in the laboratory. The point being that due to the energy cutoff, this is guaranteed to be a finite number of parameters. After these have been determined, all remaining quantities given by the Lagrangian are then predictions of the effective theory.
I also noted at the same time that interactions between a pair of lepton doublets and a pair of scalar doublets can generate a neutrino mass, which is suppressed only by a factor , and that therefore with a reasonable estimate of could produce observable neutrino oscillations. The subsequent confirmation of neutrino oscillations lends support to the view of the Standard Model as an effective field theory, with M somewhere in the neighborhood of . (Weinberg 09, p. 15)
The string scattering amplitudes for superstrings are finite (fully proven so for low loop order and with various plausibility arguments for higher loop order, see at string scattering amplitudes for more), hence define a UV-complete S-matrix. The corresponding low energy effective field theories are theories of supergravity coupled to gauge theory. (type II supergravity, heterotic supergravity).
See also at string theory FAQ – What is string theory?.
The modern picture of effective low-energy QFT goes back to
L. P. Kadanoff, Scaling laws for Ising models near , Physica 2 (1966);
Kenneth Wilson, Renormalization group and critical phenomena , I., Physical review B 4(9) (1971).
Joe Polchinski, Renormalization and effective Lagrangians , Nuclear Phys. B B231 (1984).
Steven Weinberg, Physica 96 A (1979) 327
H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys., NY 235 (1994) 165.
A review is in
A brief introduction aimed at mathematicians is in
A standard textbook adopting this perspective is
whose author describes his goal as: “This is intended to be a book on quantum field theory for the era of effective field theory.” Another book which takes the effective-field-theory approach to QFT is
Introductory lecture notes are for instance in
The point that perturbatively non-renormalizable theories may be regarded as effective field theories at each energy scale was highligted in
Mario Atance, Jose Luis Cortes, Effective Field Theory of pure Gravity and the Renormalization Group (arXiv:hep-th/9604076)
Comments on this point are also in
Jacques Distler, blog posts