Background
Basic concepts
equivalences in/of -categories
Universal constructions
Local presentation
Theorems
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Models
is the (∞,2)-category of all small (∞,1)-categories.
Its full subcategory on ∞-groupoids is ∞Grpd.
One incarnation of (∞,2)-categories is given by quasi-category-enriched categories (see there for details). As such is the full SSet-enriched subcategory of SSet on those simplicial sets that are quasi-categories. By the fact described at (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-functors this is indeed a quasi-category-enriched category.
The model category presenting this (∞,2)-category is the Joyal model structure for quasi-categories . Its full sSet-subcategory is the quasi-category enriched category of quasi-categories from above.
Sometimes it is useful to consider inside the full -catgeory of -categories just the maximal -category and discarding all non-invertible 2-morphisms. This is the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-categories.
As an SSet-enriched category the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-categories is obtained from the quasi-category-enriched version by picking in each hom-object simplicial set of the maximal Kan complex.
One model category structure presenting this is the model structure on marked simplicial sets. As a plain model category this is Quillen equivalent to , but as an enriched model category it is enriched, so that its full SSet-subcategory on fibrant-cofibrant objects presents the -category of -categories.
Limits and colimits over a (∞,1)-functor with values in may be reformulation in terms of the universal fibration of (infinity,1)-categories
Then let be any (∞,1)-category and
an (∞,1)-functor. Recall that the coCartesian fibration classified by is the pullback of the universal fibration of (∞,1)-categories along F:
Let the assumptions be as above. Then:
The colimit of is equivalent to :
The limit of is equivalent to the (infinity,1)-category of cartesian section of
This is HTT, section 3.3.
The full subcategory of the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-categories on those (∞,1)-functors that are equivalences is equivalent to : it contains only the identity functor and the one that sends an -category to its opposite (infinity,1)-category.
This is due to
233-263.
It appears as HTT, theorem 5.2.9.1 (arxiv v4+ only)
First of all the statement is true for the ordinary category of posets. This is prop. 5.2.9.14.
From this the statement is deduced for -categories by observing that posets are characterized by the fact that two parallel functors into them that are objectwise equivalent are already equivalent, prop. 5.2.9.11, which means that posets are characterized by the fact that
is an injection for all .
This is preserved under automorphisms of , hence any such automorphism preserves posets, hence restricts to an automorphism of the category of posets, hence must be either the identity or there, by the above statement for posets.
Now finally the main point of the proof is to see that the linear posets are dense in , i.e. that the identity transformation of the inclusion functor exhibits as the left Kan extension
The entries of the following table display model categories and Quillen equivalences between these that present the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-categories (second table), of (∞,1)-operads (third table) and of -monoidal (∞,1)-categories (fourth table).
Cat, (∞,1)Operad
Last revised on October 13, 2021 at 15:32:54. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.