nLab Grothendieck duality

Grothendieck duality

Grothendieck duality

Idea

Given a homomorphism ff of schemes, one says that it satisfies Grothendieck duality if the (derived) direct image functor f *f_\ast on quasicoherent sheaves has a (derived) right adjoint f !f^!. This is Verdier duality in a “Grothendieck context” of six operations.

Grothendieck duality is intimately connected to dualizing complexes. This was the original approach of Grothendieck in the book Residues and Duality.

Statement

Suppose f:X→Yf\colon X \to Y is a quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphism of schemes; then the triangulated functor Rf *:D qc(X)→D(Y)\mathbf{R}f_*\colon D_{qc}(X)\to D(Y) has a bounded below right adjoint. In other words, RHom X(ℱ,f ×𝒢)→∼RHom Y(Rf *ℱ,𝒢)\mathbf{R}Hom_X(\mathcal{F}, f^\times \mathcal{G})\stackrel{\sim}{\to} \mathbf{R}Hom_Y(\mathbf{R}f_*\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}) is a natural isomorphism.

Dualizing Complexes

Let XX be a noetherian scheme. A dualizing complex on XX is a complex ℛ∈D(ModX)\mathcal{R} \in \mathsf{D}(\mathsf{Mod} X) that has these three properties:

  • ℛ∈D c b(ModX)\mathcal{R} \in \mathsf{D}^{\mathrm{b}}_{\mathrm{c}}(\mathsf{Mod} X) (i.e. ℛ\mathcal{R} has bounded coherent cohomology sheaves).

  • ℛ\mathcal{R} has finite injective dimension.

  • The canonical morphism 𝒪 X→Rℋℴ𝓂 X(ℛ,ℛ)\mathcal{O}_X \to \mathrm{R} \mathcal{Hom}_{X}(\mathcal{R}, \mathcal{R}) in D(ModX)\mathsf{D}(\mathsf{Mod} X) is an isomorphism.

The following two structures are basically equivalent to each other, for a given category of noetherian schemes S\mathsf{S}:

  • A psudofunctor f↦f !f \mapsto f^!, called the twisted inverse image, that assigns a functor

    f !:D c +(ModY)→D c +(ModX) f^! : \mathsf{D}^{+}_{\mathrm{c}}(\mathsf{Mod} Y) \to \mathsf{D}^{+}_{\mathrm{c}}(\mathsf{Mod} X)

    to each map of schemes f:X→Yf : X \to Y in S\mathsf{S}, and has several known properties.

  • A dualizing complex ℛ X\mathcal{R}_X for every scheme XX in the category S\mathsf{S}, with several known functorial properties.

The relation between these two structures is demonstrated in the following Example.

Example. Suppose KK is a regular finite dimensional noetherian ring, and let S\mathsf{S} be the category of finite type KK-schemes. Given a twisted inverse image psudofunctor f↦f !f \mapsto f^!, we define dualizing complexes as follows: on any X∈SX \in \mathsf{S} with structural morphism π X:X→SpecK\pi_X : X \to \operatorname{Spec} K, we let ℛ X:=π X !(K)\mathcal{R}_X := \pi_X^!(K).

Conversely, suppose we are given a dualizing complex ℛ X\mathcal{R}_X on each X∈SX \in \mathsf{S}. This gives rise to a duality (contrvariant equivalence) D XD_X of D c (ModX)\mathsf{D}^{}_{\mathrm{c}}(\mathsf{Mod} X), exchanging D c +(ModX)\mathsf{D}^{+}_{\mathrm{c}}(\mathsf{Mod} X) with D c −(ModX)\mathsf{D}^{-}_{\mathrm{c}}(\mathsf{Mod} X), with formula

D X(ℳ):=Rℋℴ𝓂 X(ℳ,ℛ X). D_X(\mathcal{M}) := \mathrm{R} \mathcal{Hom}_{X}(\mathcal{M}, \mathcal{R}_X) .

We then define

f !(ℳ):=D Y(Lf *(D X(ℳ))). f^!(\mathcal{M}) := D_Y( \mathrm{L} f^* ( D_X(\mathcal{M}) )) .

Rigid Dualizing Complexes

The notion of rigid dualizing complex was introduced by Van den Bergh in 1997, for a noncommutative ring AA over a base field KK.

Yekutieli and Zhang have shown how to define a rigid dualizing complex R A/KR_{A/K}, when KK is a regular finite dimensional noetherian ring, and AA is an essentially finite type KK-ring (both commutative). A refined variant of the rigid dualizing complex, namely the rigid residue complex 𝒦 A/K\mathcal{K}_{A/K}, was shown to exist, and to be unique (up to a unique isomorphism of complexes).

These rigid residue complexes have all the good functorial properties alluded to above, and even more. Specifically, they are covariant for essentially etale ring homomorphisms A→A′A \to A' (via the rigid localization homomorphism), and contravariant (as graded modules) for all ring homomorphisms A→BA \to B (via the ind-rigid trace homomorphism).

The rigid localization homomorphism permits the gluing of the rigid residue complexes 𝒦 A/K\mathcal{K}_{A/K} on affine open sets U=SpecAU = \operatorname{Spec} A of a scheme XX into a rigid residue complex 𝒦 X/K\mathcal{K}_{X/K} on XX. In this way one obtains a collection of dualizing complexes 𝒦 X/K\mathcal{K}_{X/K} on all essentially finite type KK-schemes XX, consisting of quasi-coherent injective sheaves. For any map of scheme f:X→Yf : X \to Y there is the ind-rigid trace homomoprhism

Tr f:f *(𝒦 Y/K)→𝒦 X/K, \mathrm{Tr}_f : f_*(\mathcal{K}_{Y/K}) \to \mathcal{K}_{X/K} ,

which is a homomorphism of graded quasi-coherent sheaves. The Residue Theorem says that when ff is proper, Tr f\mathrm{Tr}_f is a homomorphism of complexes. The Duality Theorem says that when ff is proper, Tr f\mathrm{Tr}_f induces global duality. As explained above, there is a corresponding functor f !f^!; and the Duality Theorem says that Rf *\mathrm{R} f_* and f !f^! are adjoint functors.

Moreover, the rigidity method works also for finite type Deligne-Mumford stacks over KK. The key observation is that the rigid residue complexes are complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves in the etale site over KK. Details of this extension of the theory are still under preparation.

Noncommutative Grothendieck Duality

(To be added later)

References

  • Robin Hartshorne, Residues and duality (Lecture notes of a seminar on the work of A. Grothendieck, given at Harvard 1963/64. With an appendix by P. Deligne.) Springer LNM 20, 1966 MR222093

  • Domingo Toledo, Yue Lin L. Tong, Duality and intersection theory in complex manifolds. I., Math. Ann. 237 (1978), no. 1, 41–77, MR80d:32008, doi

  • Mitya Boyarchenko, Vladimir Drinfeld, A duality formalism in the spirit of Grothendieck and Verdier, arxiv/1108.6020

  • Z. Mebkhout, Le formalisme des six opérations de Grothendieck pour les 𝒟 X\mathcal{D}_X-modules cohérents, Travaux en Cours 35. Hermann, Paris, 1989. x+254 pp. MR90m:32026

  • Amnon Neeman, Derived categories and Grothendieck duality, in: Triangulated categories, 290–350, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 375, Cambridge Univ. Press 2010

  • Amnon Neeman, The Grothendieck duality theorem via Bousfield’s techniques and Brown representability, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), no. 1, 205–236, MR96c:18006, doi

  • Brian Conrad: Grothendieck duality and base change, Lec. Notes Math. 1750, Springer (2000) [doi:10.1007/b75857, errata]

  • Joseph Lipman, Notes on derived functors and Grothendieck duality, in: Foundations of Grothendieck duality for diagrams of schemes, 1–259, Lecture Notes in Math. 1960, Springer 2009, doi, draft pdf

  • J. Lipman, Grothendieck operations and coherence in categories, conference slides, 2009, pdf

  • Alonso Tarrío, Leovigildo; Jeremías López, Ana; Joseph Lipman, Studies in duality on Noetherian formal schemes and non-Noetherian ordinary schemes, Contemporary Mathematics 244 Amer. Math. Soc. 1999. x+126L. MR2000h:14017; Duality and flat base change on formal schemes, Contemporary Math. 244 (1999), pp. 3–90.

  • J. Ayoub, Les six opérations de Grothendieck et le formalisme des cycles évanescents dans le monde motivique. I., Astérisque No. 314 (2007), x+466 pp. (2008) MR2009h:14032; II. Astérisque No. 315 (2007), vi+364 pp. (2008) MR2009m:14007; also a file at K-theory archive THESE.pdf

  • Amnon Yekutieli, James Zhang,

    Rings with Auslander Dualizing Complexes, J. Algebra 213 (1999), 1-51; Rigid dualizing complexes over commutative rings, Algebr. Represent. Theory 12 (2009), no. 1, 19–52, doi; Dualizing Complexes and Perverse Sheaves on Noncommutative Ringed Schemes, Selecta Math. 12 (2006), 137-177; Dualizing Complexes and Perverse Modules over Differential Algebras, Compositio Mathematica 141 (2005), 620-654.

  • Amnon Yekutieli,

    An Explicit Construction of the Grothendieck Residue Complex, Astérisque 208 (1992); The residue complex of a noncommutative graded algebra, J. Algebra 186 (1996), no. 2, 522–543; Smooth formal embeddings and the residue complex, Canad. J. Math. 50 (1998), no. 4, 863–896, MR99i:14004; Rigid dualizing complexes via differential graded algebras (survey), in: Triangulated categories, 452–463, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 375, Cambridge Univ. Press 2010, MR2011h:18015; Residues and Differential Operators on Schemes, Duke Math. J. 95 (1998), 305-341; Duality and Tilting for Commutative DG Rings, arXiv:1312.6411; Residues and Duality for Schemes and Stacks (lecture notes).

  • Roy Joshua, Grothendieck-Verdier duality in enriched symmetric monoidal tt-categories (pdf)

  • Pieter Belmans, section 2.2 of Grothendieck duality: lecture 3, 2014 (pdf)

  • Amnon Neeman, An improvement on the base-change theorem and the functor f !f^!, arXiv.

Last revised on May 11, 2025 at 09:00:18. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.