nLab dg-geometry

Contents

Contents

Idea

This entry describes the higher geometry/derived geometry modeled on (∞,1)-sites of formal duals of dg-algebras, bounded or unbounded, over a field of characteristic 0.

The corresponding (∞,1)-topos is the context for classical rational homotopy theory, which arises by forming function algebras on ∞-stacks over constant ∞-stacks. It is also the context in which classical and higher order Hochschild homology of algebras and dg-algebras arises naturally as the function ∞\infty-algebra on free loop space objects.

The (∞,1)(\infty,1)-toposes

We discuss some basic aspects of the (∞,1)-toposes over (∞,1)-sites of formal duals of cdg-algebras and of cdg-algebras of functions on its objects.

Over formal duals of non-positively graded cdg-algebras

Let kk be a field of characteristic 0, or more generally a commutative ℚ\mathbb{Q}-algebra.

Definition

Proposition/Definition

Write

  • cdgAlg kcdgAlg_k for the category of graded-commutative cochain dg-algebras (meaning: with differential of degree +1) in arbitrary degree;

  • cdgAlk k −cdgAlk_k^- for the full subcategory on objects with vanishing cochain cohomology in positive degree, H •≥1(−)=0H^{\bullet \geq 1}(-) = 0.

There are the standard projective model structures on dg-algebras on these categories, whose weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms and whose fibrations are the degreewise surjections.

This is considered in (Toën-Vezzosi, 2.3.1)

Proposition/Definition

Let

C↪((cdgAlg k −) op) ∘ C \hookrightarrow ((cdgAlg_k^-)^{op})^\circ

be a small full sub-(∞,1)-category of the (∞,1)-category presented by this model structure, and let CC be equipped with the structure of a subcanonical (∞,1)-site.

Write

H:=Sh (∞,1)(C) \mathbf{H} := Sh_{(\infty,1)}(C)

for the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves on CC. We have a derived Isbell duality

(𝒪⊣j):(cdgAlg k op) ∘→j←𝒪H (\mathcal{O} \dashv j) : (cdgAlg_k^{op})^\circ \stackrel{\overset{\mathcal{O}}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{j}{\to}} \mathbf{H}

where the left adjoint (∞,1)-functor 𝒪\mathcal{O} is the Yoneda extension of the inclusion cdgAlg k +↪cdgAlg kcdgAlg^+_k \hookrightarrow cdgAlg_k.

This is considered in (Ben-ZviNadler). See function algebras on ∞-stacks for details.

Properties

Proposition

The inclusion

cdgAlg k −↪cdgAlg k cdgAlg^-_k \hookrightarrow cdgAlg_k

is a homotopical context in the sense of (ToënVezzosi, def. 1.1.0.11).

This is (ToënVezzosi, lemma 2.3.11). We record the following implications of this statement

Corollary

(cdgAlg k,⊗ k)(cdgAlg_k, \otimes_k) is a symmetric monoidal model category.

Corollary

For B∈(dgcAlg k) projB \in (dgcAlg_k)_{proj} a cofibrant object, the tensor product with BB preserves weak equivalences.

This follows from (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.4).

Corollary

The inclusion

(cdgAlg k −) op↪(cdgAlg k) op (cdgAlg_k^-)^{op} \hookrightarrow (cdgAlg_k)^{op}

preserves homotopy limits, hence the induced inclusion

((cdgAlg k −) op) ∘↪((cdgAlg k) op) ∘ ((cdgAlg_k^-)^{op})^\circ \hookrightarrow ((cdgAlg_k)^{op})^\circ

preserves (∞,1)-limits.

This follows from (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.6).

Definition

For A∈cdgAlg kA \in cdgAlg_k a dg-algebra, write

Corollary

For any A∈cdgAlg kA\in cdgAlg_k say a morphism in cdgAlg AcdgAlg_A is

  • a weak equivalence precisely if it is a quasi-isomorphism;

  • a fibration precisely if it is degreewise surjective.

This makes cdgAlg AcdgAlg_A into a model category that is

There is an equivalence of categories with the under category of cdg-algebras under AA

cdgAlg A≃A/cdgAlg k cdgAlg_A \simeq A/cdgAlg_k

which is a Quillen equivalence with respect to the standard model structure on an under category on the right.

This is (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.4, remark on p. 18).

Corollary

For B∈cdgAlg AB \in cdgAlg_A cofibrant with respect to the model structure in cor , the tensor product (base change) functor

B⊗ A(−):AMod→BMod B \otimes_A (-) : A Mod \to B Mod

preserves weak equivalences.

This is (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.4).

Proposition

The monoidal Dold-Kan correspondence provides a Quillen equivalence

(Γ cmon⊣N •):cAlg k Δ op→N •←Γ cmoncdgAlg k + (\Gamma^{cmon} \dashv N_\bullet) : cAlg_k^{\Delta^{op}} \stackrel{\overset{\Gamma^{cmon}}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{N_\bullet}{\to}} cdgAlg_k^+

(since kk is assumed to be of characteristic 0). Under this equivalence we have that U∈cAlg k↪cAlg k Δ op↪HU \in cAlg_k \hookrightarrow cAlg_k^{\Delta^{op}} \hookrightarrow \mathbf{H} is 𝒪\mathcal{O}-perfect:

𝒪(X K)≃K⋅𝒪(X) \mathcal{O} (X^{K}) \simeq K \cdot \mathcal{O}(X)

and this recovers the constructions discussed above in The Hochschild chain complex of an associative algebra.

Proof

Since the (∞,1)-Yoneda embedding yy commutes with (∞,1)-limits we have that the powering (y(U)) K≃y(U K)(y(U))^{K} \simeq y(U^K) is still representable. Therefore

𝒪((y(U)) K)≃𝒪(U K)∈(cdgAlg k −) op↪(cdgAlg k) op \mathcal{O} ((y(U))^K) \simeq \mathcal{O}(U^K) \;\; \in (cdgAlg_k^-)^{op} \hookrightarrow (cdgAlg_k)^{op}

is simply the formal dual of U KU^K, which is K⋅𝒪(U)K \cdot \mathcal{O}(U) formed in cdgAlg kcdgAlg_k by formal duality. By the above proposition the inclusion cdgAlg k −↪cdgAlg kcdgAlg_k^- \hookrightarrow cdgAlg_k preserves this (∞,1)(\infty,1)-colimit.

Over formal duals of general cdg-algebras

(…)

Applications

References

Various model category presentations of dg-geometry are presented in

The geometric ∞-function theory of perfect ∞-stacks in dg-geometry, and the corresponding Hochschild cohomology is considered in

The (𝒪⊣Spec)(\mathcal{O} \dashv Spec)-adjunction for dg-geometry is studied in

The basic reference for the model structure on dg-algebras (see there for more details) for the commutative case over a field of characteristic 0 is

Details on the use of this model category structure for modelling dg-spaces are in

Last revised on October 17, 2011 at 13:27:35. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.