higher geometry / derived geometry
Ingredients
Concepts
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
Constructions
Examples
derived smooth geometry
Theorems
This entry describes the higher geometry/derived geometry modeled on (∞,1)-sites of formal duals of dg-algebras, bounded or unbounded, over a field of characteristic 0.
The corresponding (∞,1)-topos is the context for classical rational homotopy theory, which arises by forming function algebras on ∞-stacks over constant ∞-stacks. It is also the context in which classical and higher order Hochschild homology of algebras and dg-algebras arises naturally as the function -algebra on free loop space objects.
We discuss some basic aspects of the (∞,1)-toposes over (∞,1)-sites of formal duals of cdg-algebras and of cdg-algebras of functions on its objects.
Let be a field of characteristic 0, or more generally a commutative -algebra.
Write
for the category of graded-commutative cochain dg-algebras (meaning: with differential of degree +1) in arbitrary degree;
for the full subcategory on objects with vanishing cochain cohomology in positive degree, .
There are the standard projective model structures on dg-algebras on these categories, whose weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms and whose fibrations are the degreewise surjections.
This is considered in (Toën-Vezzosi, 2.3.1)
Let
be a small full sub-(∞,1)-category of the (∞,1)-category presented by this model structure, and let be equipped with the structure of a subcanonical (∞,1)-site.
Write
for the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves on . We have a derived Isbell duality
where the left adjoint (∞,1)-functor is the Yoneda extension of the inclusion .
This is considered in (Ben-ZviNadler). See function algebras on ∞-stacks for details.
This is (ToënVezzosi, lemma 2.3.11). We record the following implications of this statement
For a cofibrant object, the tensor product with preserves weak equivalences.
This follows from (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.4).
The inclusion
preserves homotopy limits, hence the induced inclusion
preserves (∞,1)-limits.
This follows from (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.6).
For a dg-algebra, write
for its category of dg-modules;
This is naturally a symmetric monoidal category.
for the category of commutative monoids in , the category of cdg--algebras.
For any say a morphism in is
a weak equivalence precisely if it is a quasi-isomorphism;
a fibration precisely if it is degreewise surjective.
This makes into a model category that is
There is an equivalence of categories with the under category of cdg-algebras under
which is a Quillen equivalence with respect to the standard model structure on an under category on the right.
This is (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.4, remark on p. 18).
For cofibrant with respect to the model structure in cor , the tensor product (base change) functor
preserves weak equivalences.
This is (ToënVezzosi, assumption 1.1.0.4).
The monoidal Dold-Kan correspondence provides a Quillen equivalence
(since is assumed to be of characteristic 0). Under this equivalence we have that is -perfect:
and this recovers the constructions discussed above in The Hochschild chain complex of an associative algebra.
Since the (∞,1)-Yoneda embedding commutes with (∞,1)-limits we have that the powering is still representable. Therefore
is simply the formal dual of , which is formed in by formal duality. By the above proposition the inclusion preserves this -colimit.
(…)
Hochschild cohomology: section Higher order HH modeled on cdg-algebras;
perfect ∞-stacks and their geometric ∞-function theory
Various model category presentations of dg-geometry are presented in
The geometric ∞-function theory of perfect ∞-stacks in dg-geometry, and the corresponding Hochschild cohomology is considered in
The -adjunction for dg-geometry is studied in
The basic reference for the model structure on dg-algebras (see there for more details) for the commutative case over a field of characteristic 0 is
Details on the use of this model category structure for modelling dg-spaces are in
Kai Behrend, Differential graded schemes I: prefect resolving algebras (arXiv:0212225)
Kai Behrend, Differential Graded Schemes II: The 2-category of Differential Graded Schemes (arXiv:0212226)
Last revised on October 17, 2011 at 13:27:35. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.