Rel, bicategory of relations, allegory
left and right euclidean;
extensional, well-founded relations.
In ordinary set theory one says:
A (binary) relation on a set is transitive if in every chain of pairwise related elements, the first and last elements are also related:
If (1) holds this way for 3 elements, then the analogue holds for any finite positive number of elements.
In terms of category theory, a transitive relation may be understood as a semicategory or magmoid such that for all objects and in , there is no more than one morphism with domain and codomain . Equivalently, a transitive relation is a semicategory or magmoid enriched in truth values.
Compare at preorder – as a category.
In the language of the 2-poset Rel of sets and relations, a relation is transitive if it contains its composite with itself:
from which it follows that for any positive natural number . To include the case where , we must explicitly state that the relation is reflexive.
Transitive relations might be understood as the most rudimentary notion of orders, but rarely are without further requirements. (Some discussion to this effect is at math.SE:a/2210713.)
Last revised on February 15, 2025 at 11:04:33. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.