Schreiber Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra

Contents

Contents

Idea

In a context of Lie theory the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra CE(A)CE(A) of an ∞-Lie groupoid AA is the algebra of functions on the ∞\infty-Lie groupoid: a cosimplicial algebra which in degree kk is the algebra of functions on the k-morphisms of the ∞\infty-Lie groupoid.

If A=𝔤A = \mathfrak{g} is the infinitesimal object given by the Lie algebra of an ordinary Lie group, then CE(A)=CE(𝔤)CE(A) = CE(\mathfrak{g}) coinices (under taking its normalized chains) with the ordinary notion of Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of a Lie algebra (with values). More generally, for 𝔞\mathfrak{a} an ∞-Lie algebroid, CE(𝔞)CE(\mathfrak{a}) is the corresponding Chevalley-Eilenberg dg-algebra.

The more general context in which the operation of forming Chevalley-Eilenberg algebras is to be understood is discussed at rational homotopy theory in an (∞,1)-topos.

Definition

Let C=CartSp thC = CartSp_{th}, the category of infinitesimally thickened Cartesian spaces (see path ∞-groupoid for this notation).

Definition/Proposition

There is an sSet-enriched Quillen adjunction

cAlg(ℝ) op→←CEsPSh(C) proj loc cAlg(\mathbb{R})^{op} \stackrel{\overset{CE}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{}{\to}} sPSh(C)_{proj}^{loc}

where cAlg(ℝ) opcAlg(\mathbb{R})^{op} is the opposite of the category of cosimplicial algebras over ℝ\mathbb{R} equipped with the standard model structure on cosimplicial algebras.

The left adjoint CECE is the functor

X↦Hom PSh(C)(X •,R), X \mapsto Hom_{PSh(C)}(X_\bullet,R) \,,

where on the right we take degreewise homs out of the simplicial object X∈sPSh(C)=[Δ op,PSh(C)]X \in sPSh(C) = [\Delta^{op},PSh(C)] into the presheaf RR represented by ℝ\mathbb{R} and regard the result as an algebra by using the algebra structure on ℝ\mathbb{R}.

Proof

First notice that CECE is indeed an sSet-enriched functor: for X,Y∈sPSh(C)X,Y \in sPSh(C), an nn-cell in the hom-complex sPSh(X,Y)sPSh(X,Y) is a morphism X⋅Δ[n]→YX \cdot \Delta[n] \to Y. Applying PSh C(−,R)PSh_C(-,R) to that yields a morphism of cosimplicial algebras PSh(Y,R)→PSh(X,R)⊗C •(Δ[n])PSh(Y,R) \to PSh(X,R) \otimes C^\bullet(\Delta[n]). This is indeed an nn-cell in cAlg(PSh(Y,R),PSh(X,R))cAlg(PSh(Y,R), PSh(X,R)) and the construction is evnidently compatible with composition on both sides

That CECE has a right adjoint

A •↦Hom Alg(A •,PSh C(−,R)):cAlg(ℝ) op→sPSh(C) A^\bullet \mapsto Hom_{Alg}(A^\bullet, PSh_C(-,R)) : cAlg(\mathbb{R})^{op} \to sPSh(C)

follows from general reasoning. In end/coend calculus we check

Hom sPSh C(X •,Hom Alg(A •,PSh C(−,R)) ≃∫ UHom SSet(X •(U),Hom Alg(A •,PSh C(U,R))) ≃∫ U,nHom Set(X n(U),Hom Alg(A n,PSh C(U,R))) ≃∫ U,nHom Alg(A n,Hom Set(X n(U),PSh C(U,R))) ≃∫ U,nHom Alg(A n,Hom Set(X n(U),PSh C(U,R))) ≃∫ nHom Alg(A n,∫ UHom Set(X n(U),PSh C(U,R))) ≃∫ nHom Alg(A n,Hom PSh C(X n,R)) ≃Hom Alg Δ(A •,PSh C(X n,R)). \begin{aligned} Hom_{sPSh_C}(X_\bullet, Hom_{Alg}(A^\bullet, PSh_C(-,R)) &\simeq \int_U Hom_{SSet}( X_\bullet(U), Hom_{Alg}(A^\bullet, PSh_C(U,R)) ) \\ & \simeq \int_{U,n} Hom_{Set}( X_n(U), Hom_{Alg}(A^n, PSh_C(U,R)) ) \\ & \simeq \int_{U,n} Hom_{Alg}( A^n, Hom_{Set}(X_n(U), PSh_C(U,R)) ) \\ & \simeq \int_{U,n} Hom_{Alg}( A^n, Hom_{Set}(X_n(U), PSh_C(U,R)) ) \\ & \simeq \int_{n} Hom_{Alg}( A^n, \int_U Hom_{Set}(X_n(U), PSh_C(U,R)) ) \\ & \simeq \int_{n} Hom_{Alg}( A^n, Hom_{PSh_C}(X_n, R) ) \\ & \simeq Hom_{Alg^{\Delta}}( A^\bullet, PSh_C(X_n, R) ) \end{aligned} \,.

The sSetsSet-enrichment of the right adjoint is then fixed by adjunction.

To see that CECE is a left Quillen functor, first observe that a cofibration X→YX \to Y in sPSh(C) proj locsPSh(C)_{proj}^{loc} is the same as a cofibration in sPSh(C) projsPSh(C)_{proj} which is in particular a cofibration in sPSh(C) injsPSh(C)_{inj}, which is a degreewise monomorphism. It follows that Hom PSh(C)(Y n,R)→Hom PSh(C)(X n,R)Hom_{PSh(C)}(Y_n,R) \to Hom_{PSh(C)}(X_n,R) is a surjection for all n∈ℕn \in \mathbb{N}. Hence CECE preserves cofibrations.

Now observe that CECE send Cech nerve projections C({U i})→UC(\{U_i\}) \to U for covering families {U i→U}\{U_i \to U\} to weak equivalences (A proof of this is spelled out for instance in section 8 here ). By the nature of Bousfield localization this implies that the right adjoint of CECE sends fibrant objects to locally fibrant objects.

Since cAlg(ℝ) opcAlg(\mathbb{R})^{op} is evidently left proper, since all its objects are cofibrant, this allows to apply HTT, prop. A.3.7.2, to conclude that CECE is a left Quillen functor.

Examples

  • Let 𝔤:=Lie(BG)↪BG\mathfrak{g} := Lie(\mathbf{B}G) \hookrightarrow \mathbf{B}G be the ∞-Lie algebroid corresponding to BG\mathbf{B}G, which as a simplicial object in 𝒯\mathcal{T} is

    𝔤=(⋯(G×G) (1)→→→G (1)→→*), \mathfrak{g} = \left( \cdots (G \times G)_{(1)} \stackrel{\to}{\stackrel{\to}{\to}} G_{(1)} \stackrel{\to}{\to} {*} \right) \,,

    where in each term we have the first order infinitesimal neighbourhood of the neutral element. Then CE(𝔤)CE(\mathfrak{g}) is (under passage to normalized cochains) the ordinary Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of the Lie algebra of GG.

    This is discussed at Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra in synthetic differential geometry.

  • Let XX be an ordinary manifold. Using the notation and results from path ∞-groupoid we have that (under passage to normalized cochains) a canonical isomorphism

    CE(X Δ inf •)=(Ω •(X),d dR). CE(X^{\Delta^\bullet_{inf}}) = (\Omega^\bullet(X), d_{dR}) \,.

    Then we have a zig-zag of quasi-isomorphism

    CE(Π D(X)) → CE(Π R(X)) ↓ CE(X Δ inf •) \array{ CE(\mathbf{\Pi}_{D}(X)) &\to& CE(\mathbf{\Pi}_R(X)) \\ \downarrow \\ CE(X^{\Delta^\bullet_{inf}}) }

    in cAlg(ℝ) opcAlg(\mathbb{R})^{op}. This is the de Rham theorem in that it exhibits the equivalence between de Rham cohomology and singular cohomology (details at path ∞-groupoid.)

  • Let more generally X=(X •)X = (X_\bullet) be a simplicial manifold. Then

    CE(X (Δ inf •))=(Ω •(X •),d dR) CE(X^{(\Delta^\bullet_{inf})}) = (\Omega^\bullet(X_\bullet), d_{dR})

    is isomorphic to the simplicial deRham complex on the right. See there for the proof.

    The above proposition says that the simplicial deRham complexes of weakly equivalent simplicial manifolds are quasi-isomorphic.

Last revised on May 20, 2010 at 06:34:57. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.