nLab (infinity,1)-functor

Contents

Contents

Idea

An (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functor is a homomorphism between (∞,1)-categories. It generalizes

An (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functor is functorial (respects composition) only up to coherent higher homotopies. It may be thought of as a homotopy coherent functor or strongly homotopy functor.

The collection of all (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functors between two (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories form an (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-functors.

Definition

The details of the definition depend on the model chosen for (∞,1)-categories.

  1. quasi-category

  2. simplicially enriched category

  3. Segal category

  4. complete Segal space

In terms of quasi-categories

Definition

For CC and DD quasi-categories, an (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functor F:C→DF : C \to D is simply a morphism of the underlying simplicial sets.

A natural transformation η:F→G\eta : F \to G between two such (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functors is a simplicial homotopy

C i 0↓ ↘ F C×Δ[1] →η D i 1↑ ↗ G C. \array{ C \\ {}^{\mathllap{i_0}}\downarrow & \searrow^{\mathrlap{F}} \\ C \times \Delta[1] &\stackrel{\eta}{\to}& D \\ {}^{\mathllap{i_1}}\uparrow & \nearrow_{G} \\ C } \,.

A modification ρ\rho between natural transformations is an order 2 simplicial homotopy

ρ:C×Δ[2]→D. \rho : C \times \Delta[2] \to D \,.

Generally a kk-transfor ϕ\phi of (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functors is a simplicial homotopy of order kk between the corresponding quasi-categories

ϕ:C×Δ[k]→D. \phi : C \times \Delta[k] \to D \,.

In total, the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-functors between given quasi-categories CC and DD is the simplicial function complex

(∞,1)Cat(C,D):=sSet(C,D):=∫ k∈ΔΔ[k]⋅Hom sSet(C×Δ[k],D) (\infty,1)Cat(C,D) := sSet(C,D) := \int^{k \in \Delta} \Delta[k] \cdot Hom_{sSet}(C \times \Delta[k], D)

as computed by the canonical sSet-enrichment of sSetsSet itself.

This serves to define the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-functors.

Examples

∞\infty-Pseudo-functors / homotopy presheaves

Let CC be an ordinary category. The above definition in particular serves to generalize the notion of a pseudofunctor (functor up to homotopy)

F:C op→Grpd F : C^{op} \to Grpd

with values in the 2-category Grpd as it appears in the theory of stacks/2-sheaves:

let KanCplx⊂sSetKanCplx \subset sSet be the full subcategory of sSet on the Kan complexes. This is naturally a simplicially enriched category. Write N(KanCplx)N(\mathbf{KanCplx}) for the homotopy coherent nerve of this simplicially enriched category. This is the quasi-category-incarnaton of ∞Grpd.

Write N(C op)N(C^{op}) for the ordinary nerve of the ordinary category C opC^{op} (passing to the opposite category is just a convention here, with no effect on the substance of the statement). Then an ∞\infty-pseudofunctor or (∞,1)-presheaf or homotopy presheaf on CC is a morphism of simplicial sets

F:N(C op)→N(KanCplx). F : N(C^{op}) \to N(\mathbf{KanCplx}) \,.

One sees easily in low degrees that this does look like the a pseudofunctor there:

  1. the 1-cells of N(C)N(C) are just the morphisms in CC, so that on 1-cells we have that FF is an assignment

    F:(x←fy)↦(F(x)→F(f)F(y) F : (x \stackrel{f}{\leftarrow} y) \mapsto (F(x) \stackrel{F(f)}{\to} F(y)

    of morphisms in CC to morphisms in KanCplxKanCplx, as befits a functor;

  2. the 2-cells of N(C)N(C) are pairs of composable morphisms, so that on 2-cells we have that FF is an assignment

    F:( y g↙ ↖ f x ←g∘f z)↦( F(y) F(g)↗ ⇓ F(f,g) ↘ F(f) F(x) →F(g∘f) F(z)) F : \left( \array{ && y \\ & {}^{\mathllap{g}}\swarrow & & \nwarrow^{\mathrlap{f}} \\ x &&\stackrel{g \circ f}{\leftarrow}&& z } \right) \;\; \mapsto \;\; \left( \array{ && F(y) \\ & {}^{\mathllap{F(g)}}\nearrow & \Downarrow^{\mathrlap{F(f,g)}} & \searrow^{\mathrlap{F(f)}} \\ F(x) &&\stackrel{F(g \circ f)}{\rightarrow}&& F(z) } \right)

    which means that FF does not necessarily respect the composition of morphisms, but instead does introduce homotopies F(f,g)F(f,g) for very pairs of composable morphisms, which measure how F(g)∘F(f)F(g)\circ F(f) differs from F(g∘f)F(g \circ f). These are precisely the homotopies that one sees also in an ordinary pseudofunctor. But for our (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functor there are now also higher and higher homotopies:

  3. the 3-cells of N(C)N(C) are triples of composable morphisms (f,g,h)(f,g,h) in CC. They are sent by FF to a tetrahedron that consists of a homotopy-of-homotopies from the F(f,g)⋅F(h,g∘f)F(f,g) \cdot F( h , g\circ f ) to F(g,h)⋅F(f,h∘g)F(g, h) \cdot F(f , h \circ g);

  4. and so on.

For more see (∞,1)-presheaf.

Properties

It turns out that every (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functor C→∞GrpdC \to \infty Grpd can be rectified to an ordinary (sSet-enriched) functor with values in Kan complexes.

Theorem

For C=N(C)C = N(\mathbf{C}) a quasi-category given as the homotopy coherent nerve of a Kan-complex enriched category C\mathbf{C} (which may for instance be just an ordinary 1-category), write

[C op,sSet] [\mathbf{C}^{op}, \mathbf{sSet}]

for the sSet-enriched category of ordinary (sSetsSet-enriched) functors (respecting composition strictly).

Then: every (∞,1)(\infty,1)-functor N(C op)→∞GrpdN(\mathbf{C}^{op}) \to \infty Grpd is equivalent to a strictly composition respecting functor of this sort. Precisely: write [C op,sSet] ∘[\mathbf{C}^{op}, \mathbf{sSet}]^\circ for the full sSet\mathbf{sSet}-enriched subcategory on those strict functors that are fibrant and cofibrant in a model structure on simplicial presheaves on C\mathbf{C}. Then we have an equivalence of (∞,1)-categories

Hom (∞,1)Cat(N(C op),∞Grpd)≃N([C op,sSet] ∘). Hom_{(\infty,1)Cat}(N(\mathbf{C}^{op}), \infty Grpd) \simeq N([\mathbf{C}^{op}, \mathbf{sSet}]^\circ) \,.

More on this is at (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves.

basic properties of…

References

section 1.2.7 in

discusses morphisms of quasi-categories.

Last revised on May 27, 2020 at 16:37:02. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.