Mackey functor


Homotopy theory

Stable Homotopy theory



Quite generally, the term Mackey functor refers to an additive functor from a (subcategory of) a category of correspondences (in a disjunctive category 𝒞\mathcal{C}) to possibly any other additive category which however usually is the “base” abelian category. More generally the term now refers to the fairly obvious homotopy theoretic or higher categorical refinements of this concept.

Therefore the concept of Mackey functors is similar to that of sheaves with transfer and as such appears (implicitly) in the discussion of motives (explicitly e.g. in Kahn-Yamazaki 11, section 2, where 𝒞\mathcal{C} is a category of suitable schemes).

The concept was however introduced and named as such in the context of representation theory (Dress 71) and equivariant homotopy theory/equivariant cohomology (May 96). In that context it first received its full (∞,1)-category-theoretic formulation and discussion (Barwick 14).


We follow the modern account in (Barwick 14).

Let 𝒞\mathcal{C} be a disjunctive (∞,1)-category and write Corr 1(𝒞) Corr_1(\mathcal{C})^\otimes for the (∞,1)-category of correspondences in 𝒞\mathcal{C}, regarded as a symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category with respect to its coproduct (which is a biproduct by disjunctiveness of 𝒞\mathcal{C}).

Write 𝒜=\mathcal{A} = Spectra {}^\otimes for the (∞,1)-category of spectra regarded as a symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category with respect to the smash product of spectra. More generally 𝒜\mathcal{A} could be any symmetric monoidal stable (∞,1)-category

Then a (spectral) Mackey functor on 𝒞\mathcal{C} is a monoidal (∞,1)-functor of the form

S:Corr 1(𝒞) 𝒜 . S \;\colon\; Corr_1(\mathcal{C})^\otimes \longrightarrow \mathcal{A}^{\otimes} \,.

Notice that this means that SS is in particular

  1. a covariant (∞,1)-functor () *:𝒞𝒜(-)_\ast \colon\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{A};

  2. a contravariant (∞,1)-functor, hence () *:𝒞 op𝒜(-)^\ast \colon\mathcal{C}^{op} \to \mathcal{A};

  3. satisfying the Beck-Chevalley condition.

(More generally one may specify suitably chosen sub-(,1)(\infty,1)-categories 𝒞 ,𝒞 𝒞\mathcal{C}^\dagger, \mathcal{C}_\dagger \subset \mathcal{C} and restrict Corr 1Corr_1 to correspondences whose left leg is in 𝒞 \mathcal{C}_\dagger and whose right leg is in 𝒞 \mathcal{C}^\dagger (Barwick 14, section 5).)


Dress’ Mackey functors

For 𝒜\mathcal{A} taken to be (the derived category) of an abelian category (or better: postcomposed with a homological functor ) this definition reduces (Barwick 14) to that of Mackey functors as originally defined in (Dress 71).

Equivariant spectra

Let GG be a finite group. Let 𝒞=GSet\mathcal{C}= G Set be its category of permutation representations. Then Corr 1(𝒞)Corr_1(\mathcal{C}) is essentially what is called the Burnside category of GG (possibly after abelianizing/stabilizing the hom-spaces suitably, but as (Barwick 14) highlights, this is unnecessary when one is mapping out of this into something abelian/stable, as is the case here).

For GG finite then Mackey functors on 𝒞\mathcal{C} are equivalent to genuine G-spectra (Guillou-May 11, theorem 0.1, Barwick 14, below example B.6) (Notice that this equivalence does not in general hold if GG is not a finite group.)


For EE a genuine G-spectrum then the corresponding Mackey functor is given by the equivariant homotopy groups of EE

G/HE(G/H)=[Σ + G/H,E] G, G/H \mapsto E(G/H) = [\Sigma^\infty_+ G/H, E]_G \,,

where on the right we have the GG-equivariant mapping spectrum from the (equivariant) suspension spectrum of the orbit G/HG/H to EE.

(e.g. Guillou-May 11, remark 2.5) (see also Schwede 15, p. 16 for restriction and section 4 culminating on p. 37 for transfer and compatibility5))



The original article is

  • A. W. M. Dress, Notes on the theory of representations of finite groups. Part I: The Burnside ring of a finite group and some AGN-applications, Bielefeld, 1971,

Reviews and surveys include

  • Peter May, section IX.4 of Equivariant homotopy and cohomology theory CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 91, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC, 1996. With contributions by M. Cole, G. Comeza˜na, S. Costenoble, A. D. Elmenddorf, J. P. C. Greenlees, L. G. Lewis, Jr., R. J. Piacenza, G. Triantafillou, and S. Waner. (pdf)

  • Peter Webb, A Guide to Mackey Functors (pdf)

  • Michael Hill, Michael Hopkins, Douglas Ravenel, section 4 of The Arf-Kervaire problem in algebraic topology: Sketch of the proof (pdf)

    (with an eye towards application to the Arf-Kervaire invariant problem)

  • Megan Shulman, chapter 2 of Equivariant local coefficients and the RO(G)RO(G)-graded cohomology of classifying spaces (arXiv:1405.1770)

See also

  • Tammo tom Dieck, Transformation groups, Studies in Mathematics, vol. 8, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1987, x + 311 pp.,

  • chapter 1 of Serge Bouc, Green Functors and G-sets, LNM 1671 (1997; paperback 2008) doi:10.1007/BFb0095821

  • Tammo tom Dieck, Equivariant homology and Mackey functors, Mathematische Annalen 206, no.1, pp. 67–78, 1973 doi:10.1007/BF01431529

  • D. Tambara, The Drinfeld center of the category of Mackey functors, J. Algebra 319, 10, pp. 4018-4101 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.02.011

  • Elango Panchadcharam, Categories of Mackey Functors, PhD thesis, Macquarie Univ. 2006

The construction of equivariant stable homotopy theory in terms of Mackey functors is due to

Lectures notes include

Application of Mackey functors to the theory of motives includes

  • Bruno Kahn, Takao Yamazaki, Voevodsky’s motives and Weil reciprocity, Duke Mathematical Journal 162, 14 (2013) 2751-2796 (arXiv:1108.2764)

Revised on November 24, 2015 18:18:50 by Urs Schreiber (