nLab
holographic principle

Context

Functorial quantum field theory

Physics

physics


Contents

Idea

In quantum field theory what has come to be known as the holographic principle is the fact that the partition functions of some quantum field theories of dimension n may be identified with states of TQFTs of dimension n+1.

Notice that for Σ an (n+1)-dimensional manifold with n-dimensional boundary Σ, regarded as a cobordism Σ:Σ, an (n+1)-dimensional TQFT assigns a morphism

Z(Σ):1Z(Σ),Z(\Sigma) : 1 \to Z(\partial \Sigma) \,,

hence an element of the space Z(Σ). Under holography, this element is identified with the partition function of an n-dimensional QFT evaluated on the manifold (without boundary) Σ.

The idea that some systems in physics are governed by other systems “localized at a boundary” in this kind of way was originally suggested by the behaviour of black holes in general relativity: their black hole entropy is proportional to their “surface”, as reflected by the generalized second law of thermodynamics. This made Gerard ’t Hooft suggest a general principle, called the holographic principle , which however remained somewhat vague.

Later two more precise classes of correspondences were identified, that are regarded now as precise examples of the general idea of the holographic principle:

  1. Systems of Chern-Simons theory and higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory can be shown explicitly to have spaces of states that are canonically identified with correlator spaces of CFTs (conformal blocks) and self-dual higher gauge theory on their boundary.

  2. Systems of quantum gravity in various dimensions as given by string theory on asymptocially anti de Sitter spacetimes have been checked not in total but in a multitude of special aspects in special cases to be dual to supersymmetric CFTs on their asymptotic boundary – this is called AdS/CFT correspondence.

Remark

In view of these two classes of examples it is maybe noteworthy that one can see that also closed string field theory, which is supposed to be one side of the AdS/CFT correspondence, has the form of an infinity-Chern-Simons theory, as discussed there, for the L-infinity algebra of closed string correlators. So maybe the above two different realizations of the holographic principle are really aspects of one single mechanism for -Chern-Simons theory.

Evidence for this also comes from the details of the AdS/CFT mechanism. In (Witten98) it is discussed how the SYM/IIB duality is carried by the Chern-Simons term B NSdB RR in the type II string theory action, the 6d(2,0)/AdS7 duality - is induced by the Chern-Simons term C 3dC 3dC 3 of the 11-dimensional supergravity action.

Below at Examples we list some systems for which something along these lines is known.

More details

We discuss in a bit more detail the central idea of holography, roughly for the case of Chern-Simons type theories and making some simplifications, but giving a precise statement.

Consider some n-dimensional FQFT Z B and assume that that spaces of states that it assigns to any (n1)-dimensional manifold X are of finite dimension (over some ground field ):

dimZ B(X)<.dim Z_B(X) \lt \infty \,.

Then for Σ: inΣ outΣ any cobordism of dimension n, the correlator

Z B(Σ):Z B( inΣ)Z B( outΣ)Z_B(\Sigma) : Z_B(\partial_{in} \Sigma) \to Z_B(\partial_{out} \Sigma)

that Z B assigns may naturally be identified, under the closed monoidal structure of Vect, as an element

Z B(Σ)¯ Z B( inΣ) *Z B( outΣ) Z B(Σ).\begin{aligned} \overline{Z_B(\Sigma)} & \in Z_B(\partial_{in} \Sigma)^{*} \otimes Z_B(\partial_{out} \Sigma) \\ & \simeq Z_B(\partial \Sigma) \end{aligned} \,.

Stated differently: the vector space Z B(Σ) is the space of all “potential correlators” of Z B and Z B(Σ)¯ is the particular one chosen by the given model.

If Z B is really a CFT one calls a subspace Bl B(Σ)Z(Σ) of elements that respect conformal invariance in a certain way the space of conformal blocks and calls the assignment ΣBl B(σ) the modular functor of the model.

Notice that by looking at all “potential correlators” this way we are suddenly assigning vector spaces in codimension 0 (on Σ), even though the axioms of an FQFT a priori only mention vector spaces (of states) assigned in codimension 1. Given all these spaces of “conformal blocks”, the (re)construction of Z B consists of choosing inside each Bl B(Σ) the actual correlator Z B(Σ)¯ (this way of looking at TQFTs B is actually the way in which Atiyah originally formuated the axioms of FQFT).

But since we are dealing now with vector spaces assigned to n-dimensional Σ, we can ask the following question:

is there an (n+1)-dimensional extended TQFT A such that

  1. there is an isomorphism

    Z A(Σ)Z B(Σ)=Bl B(Σ)Z_A(\Sigma) \simeq Z_B(\partial \Sigma) = Bl_B(\Sigma)
  2. such that whenever Σ^ cobounds Σ the linear map

Z A:=Z A(Σ^)Z A(Σ^)Z A(Σ^)Bl B(Σ)Z_A : \mathbb{C} = Z_A(\hat \Sigma) \stackrel{Z_A(\hat \Sigma)}{\to} Z_A(\partial \hat \Sigma) \simeq Bl_B(\Sigma)

sends 1 to Z B(Σ)¯.

If so, we say that A is a holographic dual to B.

Notice that Z A(Σ) is the space of states of A over Σ, while Bl B(Σ) is the space of possible correlators of B over Σ. Under holography, the states of A are identified with the correlators of B.

Examples

Of higher Chern-Simons/CFT-type

RT-3d TQFT / rational 2d CFT

The class of examples of “Chern-Simons-type holography” we mention now has fairly completely and rigorously been understood. It is in turn a special and comparatively simple (but far from trivial) case of the historically earliest class of examples: ordinary Chern-Simons theory dual to a 2d WZW model below.

Given any modular tensor category C the Reshetikhin-Turaev construction procides a 3-dimensional TQFT Z C. It space of states over a 2-dimensional surface can be identified (after some work) with a space of conformal blocks for a WZW-model-liked 2d CFT. The FRS formalism provides a way to show that the states of Z C provides correlators that solve the sewing constraints.

Ordinary Chern-Simons theory / WZW-model

Ordinary 3-dimensional Chern-Simons theory for a group G is holographically dual to the 2-dimensional WZW-model.

Poisson σ-model / quantum mechanics

Ordinary quantum mechanics induced by quantization of a Poisson manifold – which may be regarded as a 1-dimensional QFT – is holographically dual to the 2-dimensional Poisson sigma-model (implicitly observed by (Kontsevich) made explicit by (CattaneoFelder).

(Notice the Poisson sigma-model is the (n=2)-case of the AKSZ sigma-model which is indeed an example of a infinity-Chern-Simons theory, as discussed there.)

A-model / quantum mechanics

Similarly the A-model on certain D-branes gives a holographic description of ordinary quantum mechanics. (Witten).

See

Notice that the A-model arises from the Poisson sigma-model, as discussed there.

Higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory / Self-dual higher gauge theory

Idea and examples

Generally, higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory in dimension 4k+3 (for k) is holographically related to self-dual higher gauge theory in dimension 4k+2 (at least in the abelian case).

Some details

We indicate why higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory is – if holographically related to anything – holographically related to self-dual higher gauge theory.

The phase space of higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory in dimension 4k+3 on Σ× can be identified with the space of flat 2k+1-forms on Σ. The presymplectic form on this space is given by the pairing

(δB 1,δB 2) ΣδB 1δB 2.(\delta B_1, \delta B_2) \mapsto \int_\Sigma \delta B_1 \wedge \delta B_2 \,.

The geometric quantization of the theory requires that we choose a polarization of the complexification? of this space (split the space of forms into “coordinates” and their “canonical momenta”).

One way to achieve this is to choose a conformal structure on Σ. The corresponding Hodge star operator

:Ω 2k+1(Σ)Ω 2k+1(Σ)\star : \Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma) \to \Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma)

provides the polarization by splitting into self-dual and anti-self-dual forms:

notice that (by the formulas at Hodge star operator) we have on mid-dimensional forms

B=(1) (2k+1)(4k+3)B=B.\star \star B = (-1)^{(2k+1)(4k+3)} B = - B \,.

Therefore it provides a complex structure on Ω 2k+1(Σ).

We see that the symplectic structure on the space of forms can equivalently be rewritten as

XB 1B 2 = XB 1B 2.\begin{aligned} \int_X B_1 \wedge B_2 & = - \int_X B_1 \wedge \star \star B_2 \end{aligned} \,.

Here on the right now the Hodge inner product of B 1 with B 2 appears, which is invariant under applying the Hodge star to both arguments.

We then decompose Ω 2k+1(Σ) into the ±i-eigenspace?s of : say BΩ 2k+1(Σ) is imaginary self-dual if

B=iB\star B = i B

and imaginary anti-self-dual if

B=iB.\star B = - i B \,.

Then for imaginary self-dual B 1 and B 2 we find that the symplectic pairing is

(B 1,B 2) =i XB 1B 2 =i X(B 1)(B 2) =+i XB 1B 2.\begin{aligned} (B_1, B_2) &= -i \int_X B_1 \wedge \star B_2 \\ & = -i \int_X (\star B_1) \wedge \star (\star B_2) \\ & = +i \int_X B_1 \wedge \star B_2 \end{aligned} \,.

Therefore indeed the symplectic pairing vanishes on the self-dual and on the anti-selfdual forms. Evidently these provide a decomposition into Lagrangian subspaces.

Therefore a state of higher Chern-Simons theory on Σ may locally be thought of as a function of the self-dual forms on Σ. Under holography this is (therefore) identified with the correlator of a self-dual higher gauge theory on Σ.

Of AdS gravity/CFT-type

Type II on AdS 5×S 5 and d=4 super Yang-Mills

Conjecturally, type II string theory on a anti-de Sitter space background is holographically dual to super Yang-Mills theory on the asymptotic boundary.

See AdS/CFT correspondence.

M-theory on AdS 7×S 4 and 6d (2,0)-SCFT on M5 branes

M-theory on AdS 7×S 4 is supposed to have as holographic boundary the 6d (2,0)-superconformal QFT. See there for references.

M-theory on AdS 4×S 7/ k and Chern-Simons on M2 branes

See ABJM theory.

References

General

The idea of the holographic principle originates in

A review is

AdS/CFT

See the references at AdS/CFT correspondence.

Chern-Simons / CFT

RT-TQFT and rational 2d CFT

An exhaustive list of references should be at FRS formalism . One article that contains a survey of much of the story is

Amplification of how the FRS formalism is inevitable once one adopts holography and QFT with defects is in

Self-dual higher gauge fields and higher abelian Chern-Simons

The idea of describing self-dual higher gauge theory by abelian Chern-Simons theory in one dimension higher originates in

More discussion of the general principle is in

A quick exposition of the basic idea is in

The application of this to the description of type II string theory in 10-dimensions to 11-dimensional Chern-Simons theory is in the followup

  • Dmitriy Belov, Greg Moore, Type II Actions from 11-Dimensional Chern-Simons Theories (arXiv)

Poisson σ-model/A-model and quantum mechanics

3d Chern-Simons theory / 2d CFT

3-dimensional Chern-Simons theory in the context of holography is discussed for instance in

  • Victor O. Rivelles, Holographic Principle and AdS/CFT Correspondence (arXiv)

Chern-Simons/CFT in AdS/CFT

In

it is argued that in the AdS/CFT correspondence it is in fact just the Chern-Simon terms inside the corresponding supergravity theories whose states control the conformal blocks of the dual CFT. So the CS/CFT correspondence is a part (a crucial part) of the AdS/CFT correspondence, at least for AdS 5/CFT 4 and AdS 7/CFT 6.

General abstract formulation

An identification of boundary conditions and defects as natural transformations between higher dimensional FQFTs is discussed in

  • Chris Schommer-Pries, Topological defects and classifying local topological field theories in low dimension (pdf)

See holographic principle of higher category theory for more on this.