The theory of knots is very visual. It can provide a link between the concrete and abstract. Some of the arguments are quite elementary, others very deep, and there are numerous connections with other parts of mathematics.
Typically, knots are considered up to ambient isotopy.
Knots that are ambient isotopic are often said to have the same knot type or to be in the same isotopy class.
The trefoil knot is the simplest non-trivial knot. In its simplest representation, it has three crossings. It is a torus knot, that is it can be embedded on the surface of a solid torus, itself embedded in . Here is a picture:
Classifying knots up to isotopy is usually done using knot invariants. Some of these are simple to define (these tend to be geometric and also tend to be hard to calculate) others are harder to define and to show they are invariants but are easier to calculate. A few are reasonably easy to define and to calculate… Yippee!
It is often useful to consider the domain circle of a knot as being oriented. This is then represented by putting a directional arrow on diagrams of the knot. Such oriented knots are usually considered up to ambient isotopy in which the isotopy is orientation preserving. This leads to the idea of invertible knots?. It is also possible to take the mirror reflection? of knots and thus to introduce the concept of achiral knots?.
The theory of knots can be extended to include various similar things:
There are various pages related to knot theory that are linked from the main articles.
The study of knots is very pictorial. There are various knot-related SVGs that can be included in to nLab pages.
For introductions to Knot Theory,
These do not, of course, handle more modern developments.
Other classic sources are
The second of these discusses many of the connections between knots and state sum calculations related to quantum field theories.
Another reference for the classical theory is