homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
Subdivision is an (often) functorial process which takes as input some combinatorial notion of space (for example, a simplicial complex or simplicial set) and produces as output a more finely meshed space. It is related to the notion of classical subdivision.
There is a more general use of the term in which one simplicial set or complex is a subdivision of another, although the relation may not be functorially generated. We will briefly look at one such example later.
There are various standard forms of functorial subdivision, the most common of which is barycentric subdivision.
Barycentric subdivision is easiest to define for simplicial complexes. We have a pair of functors
where
The functor $U$ sends a simplicial complex $(V, \Sigma)$ to $\Sigma$, regarded as a poset ordered by inclusion, and
The functor $Flag$ sends a poset $P$ to the simplicial complex whose vertex set is $P$ and whose simplices are the underlying sets $\{x_0, \ldots, x_n\}$ of flags $x_0 \lt \ldots \lt x_n$.
The composite $Flag \circ U$ is called the subdivision $Sd$; it is an endofunctor of $SimpComplex$. A vertex of $Sd(X)$ is a simplex of $X$.
Let $\alpha_X : X \to Sd(X)$ be a morphism of simplicial complexes that sends a vertex $v$ of $X$ to the vertex $\{v\}$ of $Sd(X)$. Then ${|f|}: {|X|}\xrightarrow{\cong} {|Sd(X)|}$ is an isomorphism, where $|-|$ is the usual geometric realization of simplicial complexes. In terms of categories, $\alpha$ is a natural transformation from the identity to the endofunctor $Sd$ whose geometric realization is a natural isomorphism.
This is what it looks like for $X$ the 2-simplex.
The simplicial complex which is the 2-simplex has as its poset of simplices the partially ordered set of non-empty subsets of $\{0,1,2\}$. The subdivided simplex therefore is the flags of that poset. The diagram shows that nerve of the corresponding category, (or rather its dual), as this is the simplicial set that one gets from this. The central vertex is the whole set $\{0,1,2\}$, the vertices on the long edges are the 2-element subsets and the three extremal vertices are the singletons.
We can now define the barycentric subdivision of a simplicial set as follows. Recall that we can make any simplicial complex into a simplicial set. If we do this for the standard $n$-simplex, which as a simplicial complex is the set $([n],P([n])$ for $[n] = \{0,1,\dots,n\}$, then we get the standard $n$-simplex simplicial set $\Delta^n$. We can then define the subdivision of $\Delta^n$, as a simplicial set, to be the simplicial set corresponding to its simplicial-complex subdivision. Finally, we can make this functorial on maps between standard simplices, and left Kan extend to a cocontinuous endofunctor of $SSet$.
Explicitly:
Write $Sd \Delta[n]$ for the nerve of category of non-degenerate simplices in the standard $n$-simplex.
For $X$ an arbitrary simplicial set, its barycentric subdivision is
A review is for instance around (Fiore-Paoli def. 3.1).
By construction (or the adjoint functor theorem), the subdivision functor $Sd$ on simplicial sets has a right adjoint, called $Ex$. A countably infinite iteration of $Ex$, called $Ex^\infty$, can be used to construct Kan fibrant replacements in the model structure on simplicial sets.
This functorial subdivision corresponds to the classical barycentric subdivision.
Other classical subdivisions that are frequently encountered include the middle edge subdivision. This latter is closely related to the ordinal subdivision of simplicial sets.
If every non-degenerate simplex in $X$ is given by a monomorphism $\Delta^n \to X$, then the barycentric subdivision of def. 1 is equivalently given by the nerve of the full subcategory of its category of simplices on the non-degenerate simplices.
A review is in section 3 of
The relation to the nerve of the category of simplices is disucssed in