# nLab path integral

## Surveys, textbooks and lecture notes

#### Integration theory

integration

analytic integrationcohomological integration
measureorientation in generalized cohomology
Riemann/Lebesgue integration, of differential formspush-forward in generalized cohomology/in differential cohomology

### Variants

under construction

# Contents

## Idea

The notion of path integral originates in and is mainly used in the context of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, where it is a certain operation supposed to model the notion of quantization.

The idea is that the quantum propagator – in FQFT the value of the functor $U:\mathrm{Cob}\to \mathrm{Vect}$ on a certain cobordism – is given by an integral kernel $U:\psi ↦\int K\left(-,y\right)\psi \left(y\right)d\mu$ where $K\left(x,y\right)$ is something like the integral of the exponentiated action functional $S$ over all field configurations $\varphi$ with prescribed boundary datat $x$ and $y$. Formally one writes

$K\left(x,y\right)=\int \mathrm{exp}\left(iS\left(\varphi \right)\right)\phantom{\rule{thickmathspace}{0ex}}D\varphi$K(x,y) = \int \exp(i S(\phi))\; D\phi

and calls this the path integral. Here the expression $D\varphi$ is supposed to allude to an measure integral on the space of all $\varphi$. The main problem with the path integral idea is that it is typically unclear what this measure should be, or, worse, it is typically clear that no suitable such measure does exist.

The name path integral originates from the special case where the system is the sigma model describing a particle on a target space manifold $X$. In this case a field configuration $\varphi$ is a path $\varphi :\left[0,1\right]\to X$ in $X$, hence the integral over all field configurations is an integral over all paths.

The idea of the path integral famously goes back to Richard Feynman, who motivated the idea in quantum mechanics. In that context the notion can typically be made precise and shown to be equivalent to various other quantization prescriptions.

The central impact of the idea of the path integral however is in its application to quantum field theory, where it is often taken in the physics literatire as the definition of what the quantum field theory encoded by an action functional should be, disregarding the fact that in these contexts it is typically quite unclear what the path integral actually means, precisely.

Notably the Feynman perturbation series summing over Feynman graphs? is motivated as one way to make sense of the path integral in quantum field theory and in practice usually serves as a definition of the perturbative path integral.

## Realizations

### In quantum mechanics

A simple form of the path integral is realized in quantum mechanics, where it was originally dreamed up by Richard Feynman and then made precise using the Feynman-Kac formula?. Most calculations in practice are still done using perturbation theory.

The Schrödinger equation says that the rate at which the phase of an energy eigenvector rotates is proportional to its energy:

(1)$i\hslash \frac{d}{\mathrm{dt}}\psi =H\psi .$i \hbar \frac{d}{dt} \psi = H \psi.

Therefore, the probability that the system evolves to the final state ${\psi }_{F}$ after evolving for time $t$ from the initial state ${\psi }_{I}$ is

(2)$⟨{\psi }_{F}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iHt}}\mid {\psi }_{I}⟩.$\langle \psi_F|e^{-iHt}|\psi_I\rangle.

Chop this up into time steps $\Delta t=t/N$ and use the fact that

(3)${\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\mid q⟩⟨q\mid =1$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|q\rangle\langle q| = 1

to get

(4)$⟨{\psi }_{F}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\left({\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\mid {q}_{N-1}⟩⟨{q}_{N-1}\mid {\mathrm{dq}}_{N-1}\right){e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\left({\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\mid {q}_{N-2}⟩⟨{q}_{N-2}\mid {\mathrm{dq}}_{N-2}\right){e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\cdots {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\left({\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\mid {q}_{1}⟩⟨{q}_{1}\mid {\mathrm{dq}}_{1}\right){e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\mid {\psi }_{I}⟩$\langle \psi_F| e^{-iH\Delta t} \left(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |q_{N-1} \rangle \langle q_{N-1}| dq_{N-1}\right) e^{-iH\Delta t} \left(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |q_{N-2} \rangle \langle q_{N-2}| dq_{N-2}\right) e^{-iH\Delta t} \cdots e^{-iH\Delta t} \left(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |q_1 \rangle \langle q_1| dq_1\right) e^{-iH\Delta t} |\psi_I\rangle
(5)$={\int }_{{q}_{1}}\cdots {\int }_{{q}_{N-2}}{\int }_{{q}_{N-1}}⟨{\psi }_{F}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\mid {q}_{N-1}⟩⟨{q}_{N-1}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\mid {q}_{N-2}⟩⟨{q}_{N-2}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\cdots {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\mid {q}_{1}⟩⟨{q}_{1}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\mid {\psi }_{I}⟩{\mathrm{dq}}_{N-1}{\mathrm{dq}}_{N-2}\cdots {\mathrm{dq}}_{1}$= \int_{q_1} \cdots \int_{q_{N-2}} \int_{q_{N-1}} \langle \psi_F| e^{-iH\Delta t} |q_{N-1} \rangle \langle q_{N-1}| e^{-iH\Delta t} |q_{N-2} \rangle \langle q_{N-2}| e^{-iH\Delta t} \cdots e^{-iH\Delta t} |q_1 \rangle \langle q_1| e^{-iH\Delta t} |\psi_I\rangle dq_{N-1} dq_{N-2} \cdots dq_1

Assume we have the free Hamiltonian $H={p}^{2}/2m.$ Looking at an individual term $⟨{q}_{n+1}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\mid {q}_{n}⟩,$ we can insert a factor of 1 and solve to get

(6)$\begin{array}{ccc}⟨{q}_{n+1}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iH}\Delta t}\left({\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{\mathrm{dp}}{2\pi }\mid p⟩⟨p\mid \right)\mid {q}_{n}⟩& =& {\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{\mathrm{dp}}{2\pi }{e}^{-{\mathrm{ip}}^{2}\Delta t/2m}⟨{q}_{n+1}\mid p⟩⟨p\mid {q}_{n}⟩\\ & =& {\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{\mathrm{dp}}{2\pi }{e}^{-{\mathrm{ip}}^{2}\Delta t/2m}{e}^{\mathrm{ip}\left({q}_{n+1}-{q}_{n}\right)}\\ & =& {\left(\frac{-i2\pi m}{\Delta t}\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}{e}^{i\Delta t\left(m/2\right)\left[\left({q}_{n+1}-{q}_{n}\right)/\Delta t{\right]}^{2}}.\end{array}$\array{\langle q_{n+1}| e^{-iH\Delta t} \left(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dp}{2\pi}|p\rangle \langle p|\right)|q_{n} \rangle &=& \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dp}{2\pi} e^{-ip^2\Delta t/2m} \langle q_{n+1}|p\rangle \langle p|q_{n} \rangle \\ &=& \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dp}{2\pi} e^{-ip^2\Delta t/2m} e^{ip(q_{n+1}-q_n)} \\ &=& \left(\frac{-i 2\pi m}{\Delta t}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{i \Delta t (m/2)[(q_{n+1}-q_n)/\Delta t]^2}.}

Defining

(7)$\int \mathrm{Dq}=\underset{N\to \infty }{\mathrm{lim}}{\left(\frac{-i2\pi m}{\Delta t}\right)}^{\frac{N}{2}}\prod _{n=0}^{N-1}\int {\mathrm{dq}}_{n},$\int Dq = \lim_{N \to \infty} \left(\frac{-i 2\pi m}{\Delta t}\right)^{\frac{N}{2}} \prod_{n=0}^{N-1} \int dq_n,

and letting $\Delta t\to 0,N\to \infty ,$ we get

(8)$⟨{\psi }_{F}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iHt}}\mid {\psi }_{I}⟩=\int \mathrm{Dq}{e}^{i{\int }_{0}^{t}\mathrm{dt}\frac{1}{2}m{\stackrel{˙}{q}}^{2}}.$\langle \psi_F|e^{-iHt}|\psi_I\rangle = \int Dq e^{i \int_0^t dt \frac{1}{2}m \dot{q}^2}.

For arbitrary Hamiltonians $H=\frac{{p}^{2}}{2m}+V\left(x\right),$ we get

(9)$\begin{array}{ccc}⟨{\psi }_{F}\mid {e}^{-\mathrm{iHt}}\mid {\psi }_{I}⟩& =& \int \mathrm{Dq}{e}^{i{\int }_{0}^{t}\mathrm{dt}\frac{1}{2}m{\stackrel{˙}{q}}^{2}-V\left(x\right)}\\ & =& \int \mathrm{Dq}{e}^{i{\int }_{0}^{t}ℒ\left(\stackrel{˙}{q},q\right)\mathrm{dt}}\\ & =& \int \mathrm{Dq}{e}^{\mathrm{iS}\left(q\right)},\end{array}$\array{\langle \psi_F|e^{-iHt}|\psi_I\rangle &=& \int Dq e^{i \int_0^t dt \frac{1}{2}m \dot{q}^2 - V(x)} \\ &=& \int Dq e^{i\int_0^t\mathcal{L}(\dot{q},q) dt} \\ &=& \int Dq e^{iS(q)}, }

where $S\left(q\right)$ is the action functional.

Is there an easy way to see how the Hamiltonian transforms into the Lagrangian in the exponent?

### In BV-formalism

BV-BRST formalism is a means to formalize the path integral in perturbation theory as the passage to cochain cohomology in a quantum BV-complex. See there for more details.

action functionalkinetic actioninteractionpath integral measure
$\mathrm{exp}\left(-S\left(\varphi \right)\right)\cdot \mu =$$\mathrm{exp}\left(-\left(\varphi ,Q\varphi \right)\right)\cdot$$\mathrm{exp}\left(I\left(\varphi \right)\right)\cdot$$\mu$
BV differentialelliptic complex +antibracket with interaction +BV-Laplacian
${d}_{q}=$$Q$ +$\left\{I,-\right\}$ +$\hslash \Delta$

## The path integral in the bigger picture

Ours is the age whose central fundamental theoretical physics question is:

What is quantum field theory?

A closely related question is:

What is the path integral ?

After its conception by Richard Feynman in the middle of the 20th century It was notably Edward Witten’s achievement in the late 20th century to make clear the vast potential for fundamental physics and pure math underlying the concept of the quantum field theoretic path integral.

And yet, among all the aspects of QFT, the notion of the path integral is the one that has resisted attempts at formalization the most.

While functorial quantum field theory is the formalization of the properties that the locality and the sewing law of the path integral is demanded to have – whatever the path integral is, it is a process that in the end yields a functor on a (infinity,n)-category of cobordisms – by itself, this sheds no light on what that procedure called “path integration” or “path integral quantization” is.

The single major insight into the right higher categorical formalization of the path integral is probably the idea indicated in

which says that

• it is wrong to think of the action functional that the path integral integrates over as just a function: it is a higher categorical object;

• accordingly, the path integral is not something that just controls the numbers or linear maps assigned by a $d$-dimensional quantum field theory in dimension $d$: also the assignment to higher codimensions is to be regarded as part of the path integral;

• notably: the fact that quantum mechanics assigns a (Hilbert) space of sections of a vector bundle to codimension 1 is to be regarded as due to a summing operation in the sense of the path integral, too: the space of sections of a vector bundle is the continuum equivalent of the direct sum of its fibers

More recently, one sees attempts to formalize this observation of Freed’s, notably in the context of the cobordism hypothesis:

based on material (on categories of “families”) in On the Classification of Topological Field Theories .

## References

The original textbook reference is

• Richard Feynman, A. R. Hibbs, , Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , New York: McGraw-Hill, (1965)

Modern precise formulations of path integral technology for quantum mechanics can be found for instance in

This discusses the path integral for the sigma-model given by a particle propagating on a Riemannian manifold and charged under a gauge field given by a connection on a bundle.

• Dana Fine, Stephen Sawin, A Rigorous Path Integral for Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and the Heat Kernel (arXiv:0705.0638)

A rigorous discussion for phase spaces equipped with a Kähler polarization and a prequantum line bundle is in

• Laurent Charles, Feynman path integral and Toeplitz Quantization (pdf)

(Usually the quadratic Hamiltonians are the ones for which the integral is well understood in several approaches; and of course many cases corresponding to the exactly solvable models. )

Other references on mathematical aspects of path integrals include

Lecture notes on quantum field theory, emphasizing mathematics of the Euclidean path integrals and the relation to statistical physics are at

Revised on April 7, 2013 15:28:11 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.139.138)