Definitions
Transfors between 2-categories
Morphisms in 2-categories
Structures in 2-categories
Limits in 2-categories
Structures on 2-categories
The notion referred to as equiv-fibrations [Lack 2002] or equifibrations [Campbell 2020, Def. 4.1] (both meant to be short fort equivalence-fibrations) or Lack fibrations [Moser, Sarazola & Verdugo 2022] is a categorification of that of isofibrations, from category theory to 2-category theory. Roughly speaking, a 2-functor between 2-categories is an equifibration if equivalences in can be ‘lifted’ to equivalences in . However, there are some subtleties to the precise definition, discussed below.
Beware that there is unrelated terminology of equifibered natural transformations.
The following works for both weak and strict 2-categories and weak and strict 2-functors.
A equifibration is a 2-functor between 2-categories such that, for every object of , and every 1-morphism of which is an equivalence, the following hold:
There is an object of and an equivalence in such that .
For every 1-morphism of and every 2-isomorphism in , there is a 2-isomorphism in such that .
Let be the free-standing equivalence. Then condition (1.) in Definition is equivalent to saying that for every (strictly!) commutative diagram of 1-morphismd
in , the 2-category of 2-categories, there is a functor such that the following diagram of 1-morphisns in (strictly!) commutes.
The same is true if is the free-standing adjoint equivalence, due to the fact that any equivalence can be improved to an adjoint equivalence.
Remark can be compared with the definition of an isofibration of 1-categories as expressed by a lifting condition: the condition is exactly the same, with the free-standing isomorphism replaced by the free-standing equivalence.
Let us explore the second condition in Definition a little. Note that any 1-morphism which is 2-isomorphic to an equivalence is itself an equivalence. Thus is an equivalence, and condition 1. then ensures that lifts to an equivalence in such that . Condition 2. expresses that must be 2-isomorphic to . This implies in particular that is an equivalence.
Putting everything together, condition 2. is equivalent to: any 1-arrow of which maps to under up to 2-isomorphism is an equivalence, and all equivalences of which map to under up to 2-isomorphism are 2-isomorphic to one another, in such a way that, given 1-arrows and of , a 2-isomorphism in , and a 2-isomorphism in , the 2-isomorphism in has the property that .
The original article, speaking of equiv-fibrations:
Beware that Lack 2002 contains an error, not pertaining directly to the definition of a equifibration itself, but to obtaining a model category structure on the category of strict 2-categories with this definition (cf. canonical model structure on 2-categories). This was fixed in the following paper Lack 2004 by using the free-standing adjoint equivalence rather than the free-standing equivalence in the generating acyclic cofibrations:
In Lack 2004, equifibrations were unnamed (and simply referred to as fibrations).
The term equifibrations is used in:
The term Lack fibrations is used in:
Last revised on March 10, 2024 at 02:48:23. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.