# nLab equivalence of 2-categories

### Context

#### 2-Category theory

2-category theory

# Equivalence of $2$-categories

## Definition

An equivalence of $2$-categories is the appropriate notion of equivalence between 2-categories. As used on the nLab, where all n-categories are usually by default “weak,” this consists of:

• (Weak) 2-functors (aka pseudofunctors) $F\colon C\to D$ and $G\colon D\to C$, and
• pseudonatural transformations $G \circ F \to Id_C$ and $F \circ G \to Id_D$ which are themselves equivalences, i.e. there are pseudonatural transformations forming their inverses up to isomorphism.

In the literature this sort of equivalence is often called a biequivalence, as it has traditionally been associated with bicategories, the standard algebraic definition of weak $2$-category. There is a stricter notion of equivalence for strict $2$-categories, which traditionally is called just a $2$-equivalence and which on the nLab is called a strict 2-equivalence.

A 2-functor can be made into part of an equivalence iff it is essentially surjective on objects, essentially full on 1-cells (i.e. essentially surjective on Hom-categories), and fully faithful on 2-cells.

## Internalization

Just as the notion of equivalence of categories can be internalized in any $2$-category, the notion of equivalence for $2$-categories can be internalized in any $3$-category in a straightforward way. The version above for $2$-categories then results from specializing this general definition to the (weak) $3$-category $2 Cat$ of $2$-categories, (weak) $2$-functors, pseudonatural transformations, and modifications.

There is one warning to keep in mind here. Every $3$-category is equivalent to a semi-strict sort of $3$-category called a Gray-category, since it is a category enriched over the monoidal category Gray of strict $2$-categories and strict $2$-functors. Of course $Gray$ itself is a Gray-category, but as such it is not equivalent to the weak $3$-category $2 Cat$ of weak $2$-categories and weak $2$-functors.

In particular, an “internal (bi)equivalence” in $Gray$ consists of strict $2$-functors $F,G$ together with pseudonatural equivalences relating $G F$ and $F G$ to identities. This is a semistrict notion of equivalence, intermediate between the fully weak notion and the fully strict one.

## References

• Weizhe Zheng, prop. 1.6 of Gluing pseudofunctors via $n$-fold categories (arXiv:1211.1877)

Last revised on November 16, 2015 at 14:04:19. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.