internalization and categorical algebra
algebra object (associative, Lie, โฆ)
internal category ($\to$ more)
There are different, related ways in which one could view the notion of algebra over a monad:
Algebras over a monad are usually objects equipped with extra structure, not just properties. (They can also be seen as algebras over the underlying endofunctor, satisfying extra compatibility properties.)
The corresponding dual notion is that of coalgebra over a comonad.
Let $(T,\eta, \mu)$ be a monad on a category $\mathcal{C}$.
An algebra over $T$ (or just $T$-algebra or $T$-module) consists of:
such that the following diagrams commute in $\mathcal{C}$ (cf. the definition of module object here):
The diagram (1) is also sometimes called the unit triangle, and the diagram (2) is also called the multiplication square or algebra square.
Let $(A,a)$ and $(B,b)$ be $T$-algebra. A homomorphism of $T$-algebras is a morphism $f \colon A \to B$ of $\mathcal{C}$ which makes the following diagram commute.
The category formed by $T$-algebras and their homomorphisms is known as the Eilenberg-Moore category of $T$ and often denoted by $\mathcal{C}^T$.
Given a monad $(T,\mu,\eta)$ on a category $\mathcal{C}$, then for every object $X$ of $\mathcal{C}$, the object $T X$ is canonically equipped with a $T$-algebra structure, given by the multiplication map $\mu$ of the monad. The relevant diagrams commute by the monad axioms.
$T$-Algebras of this sort are called free $T$-algebras.
Given any morphism $\phi \colon X \to Y$ of $\mathcal{C}$, the morphism $T \phi \colon T X \longrightarrow T Y$ is evidently a homomorphism of $T$-algebras, by naturality of $\mu$. But not every homomorphism of $T$-algebras between the free $T$-algebras $T X$ and $T Y$ arises this way, in general.
However, for any morphism of the form
in $\mathcal{C}$ (called a $T$-Kleisli morphism), the induced morphism
is a homomorphism of $T$-algebras between these free $T$-algebras, as one verifies again using the naturality of $\mu$. Now, all homomorphisms of $T$-algebras between the free algebras $T X$ and $T Y$ do arise this way.
Moreover, given in addition a morphism in $\mathcal{C}$ of the form $g \colon Y \longrightarrow T Z$, then, under this association, the composition of the corresponding $T$-algebra morphisms (3) of $f$ and $g$ equals the $T$-algebra homomorphism corresponding to their Kleisli composite, defined by
The category of Kleisli morphisms equipped with this Kleisli composition is called the Kleisli category and is eqivalent to the full subcategory of $T$-algebras on the free $T$-algebras (see there for more).
In the case of a commutative monad $T$ , one can define a tensor product of monad algebras, see there for more.
Many monads are named after their (free) algebras:
The algebras of the free monoid monad on Set are monoids, and the morphisms of algebras the monoid homomorphisms.
The algebras of the free commutative monoid monad on Set are commutative monoids, and their morphisms the monoid homomorphisms between them.
The algebras of the free group monad on Set are groups, and their morphisms are the group homomorphisms.
โฆand so on.
In these cases, the notion of free group, free monoid, et cetera coincide with the notion of free algebra given above.
Given a monoid or group $M$, the algebras of the $M$-action monad on Set are the $M$-sets, i.e. sets equipped with an action of $M$. The morphisms are the equivariant maps.
The example above generalizes to action monads given by monoid objects in a general monoidal category. Famous examples of this construction in mathematics are smooth actions of Lie groups on manifolds and actions of rings on their modules.
The algebras of the maybe monad $(-)_*\colon Set \to Set$, which adds a disjoint point, are the pointed sets.
The algebras of the power set monad are the sup-semilattices.
The algebras of the distribution monad are convex spaces, and more generally algebras of probability monads correspond to generalized convex spaces or conical spaces (see probability monad - algebras).
An algebra over a monad is a special case of a module over a monad in a bicategory. See there for more information.
The Eilenberg-Moore and Kleisli categories are also special cases of more general 2-dimensional universal constructions, namely the Eilenberg-Moore object and the Kleisli object. See those pages for more information.
algebra over a monad, module over a monad, algebra over an endofunctor, coalgebra over an endofunctor, algebra over a profunctor
Eilenberg-Moore category, Kleisli category, Eilenberg-Moore object, Kleisli object
See the References at monad, such as:
An introduction to the basic ideas, which gives some intuition for newcomers, can be found in
For monads presented in โextension systemโ/โKleisli tripleโ-form (the way traditionally used for monads in computer science โ i.e. in terms of a โbindโ-operation taking Kleisli maps to actual morphisms, not explicitly referring to the monad product) there is the corresponding โKleisli-triple styleโ or โMendler styleโ [Uustalu (2021), p. 4] for presenting the algebra/module-structures for these monads:
F. Marmolejo, Richard J. Wood, Def. 3.1 in: Monads as extension systems โ no iteration is necessary TAC 24 4 (2010) 84-113 [tac:24-04]
Thorsten Altenkirch, James Chapman, Tarmo Uustalu, Def. 2.11 in: Monads need not be endofunctors, Logical Methods in Computer Science 11 1:3 (2015) 1โ40 [arXiv:1412.7148, pdf, doi:10.2168/LMCS-11(1:3)2015]
(stated in the generality of relative monads)
Tarmo Uustalu, p. 4 of: Monads and Interaction Lecture 2 lecture notes for MGS 2021 (2021) [pdf, pdf]
See also
Last revised on November 6, 2022 at 09:20:28. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.