symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
An initial algebra for an endofunctor $F$ on a category $C$ is an initial object in the category of algebras of $F$. These play a role in particular as the categorical semantics for inductive types.
The concept of an algebra of an endofunctor is arguably somewhat odd, a more natural concept being that of an algebra over a monad. However, the former can often be reduced to the latter.
If $\mathcal{C}$ is a complete category, then the category of algebras of an endofunctor $F : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C}$ is equivalent to the category of algebras over a monad of the free monad on $F$, if the latter exists.
The proof is fairly straightforward, see for instance (Maciej) or at free monad.
The existence of free monads, on the other hand, can be a tricky question. One general technique is the transfinite construction of free algebras.
If $F$ has an initial algebra $\alpha: F(X) \to X$, then $X$ is isomorphic to $F(X)$ via $\alpha$.
In this sense, $X$ is a fixed point of $F$. Being initial, $X$ is the smallest fixed point of $F$ in that there is a map from $X$ to any other fixed point (indeed, any other algebra), and this map is an injection if $C$ is Set.
The dual concept is terminal coalgebra, which is the largest fixed point of $F$.
Given an initial algebra structure $\alpha: F(X) \to X$, define an algebra structure on $F(X)$ to be $F(\alpha): F(F(X)) \to F(X)$. By initiality, there exists an $F$-algebra map $i: X \to F(X)$, so that
commutes. Now it is trivial, in fact tautological that $\alpha$ is itself an $F$-algebra map $F(X) \to X$. Thus $\alpha \circ i = 1_X$, since both sides of the equation are $F$-algebra maps $X \to X$ and $X$ is initial. As a result, $F(\alpha) \circ F(i) = 1_{F(X)}$, so that $i \circ \alpha = 1_{F(X)}$ according to the commutative square. Hence $\alpha$ is an isomorphism, with inverse $i$.
In many cases, initial algebras can be constructed in a recursive/iterative fashion using Adámek's fixed point theorem.
Initial algebras of endofunctors provide categorical semantics for extensional inductive types. The generalization to weak initial algebras captures the notion in intensional type theory and homotopy type theory.
The archetypical example of an initial algebra is the set of natural numbers natural numbers object.
Let $\mathcal{T}$ be topos and let $F : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{T}$ the functor given by
(i.e. the functor underlying the “maybe monad”). Then an initial algebra over $F$ is precisely a natural number object $\mathbb{N}$ in $\mathcal{T}$.
By definition, an $F$-algebra is an object $X$ equipped with a morphism
hence equivalently with a point $0 : * \to X$ and an endomorphism $s : X \to X$. Initiality means that for any other $F$-algebra $(0_Y, s_Y) : * \coprod Y \to Y$, there is a unique morphism $f : X \to Y$ such that the diagram
commutes. This is the very definition of natural number object $X = \mathbb{N}$.
Another example of an initial algebra is the bi-pointed set? $\mathbf{2}$.
Let $\mathcal{T}$ be topos and let $F : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{T}$ the functor given by
Then an initial algebra over $F$ is precisely a bi-pointed object $\mathbf{2}$ in $\mathcal{T}$.
Theorem applies (in particular) to any functor $F: Set \to Set$ which is a colimit of finitely representable functors $hom(n, -): X \mapsto X^n$, as in the following examples.
Let $A$ be a set, and let $F: Set \to Set$ be the functor $F(X) = 1 + A \times X$. Then the initial $F$-algebra is $A^*$, the free monoid on $A$. The $F$-algebra structure is
where $e: 1 \to A^*$ is the identity and $m|: A \times A^* \to A^*$ is the restriction of the monoid multiplication along the evident inclusion $i \times 1: A \times A^* \to A^* \times A^*$.
This “fixed point” of $F$ can be thought of as the result of the (slightly nonsensical) calculation
which can be made rigorous by interpreting the initial equality as defining the solution $X$ by recursion, and applying the theorem above.
Let $F: Set \to Set$ be the functor $F(X) = 1 + X^2$. Then the initial $F$-algebra is the set $T$ of isomorphism classes of finite (planar, rooted) binary trees. The $F$-algebra structure is
where $r: 1 \to T$ names the tree consisting of just a root vertex, and $j: T^2 \to T$ creates a tree $t \vee t'$ from two trees $t$, $t'$ by joining their roots to a new root, so that the root of $t$ becomes the left child and the root of $t'$ the right child of the new root.
The recursive equation
would seem to imply that the structure $T$ behaves something like a structural “sixth root of unity”, and indeed the structural isomorphism $T \cong F(T)$ allows one to exhibit an isomorphism
constructively, as famously explored by Andreas Blass in the paper “Seven trees in one”.
Let $F: Set \to Set$ be the functor $F(X) = X^*$ (the free monoid from an earlier example). Then the initial $F$-algebra is the set of isomorphism classes of finite planar rooted trees (not necessarily binary as in the previous example).
Let $C$ be the coslice category $\mathbb{Z} \downarrow Ab$, and let $F: C \to C$ be the functor which pushes out along the multiplication-by-$p$ map $p \cdot -: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$. Then the initial $F$-algebra is the Pruefer group $\mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]/\mathbb{Z}$. See the discussion at the n-Category Café, starting here.
Let $Ban$ be the category of complex Banach spaces and maps of norm bounded above by $1$, and let $F: \mathbb{C} \downarrow Ban \to \mathbb{C} \downarrow Ban$ be the squaring functor $X \mapsto X \times X$. Then the initial $F$-algebra is $L^1([0, 1])$ (with respect to the usual Lebesgue measure). This result is due to Tom Leinster; see this MathOverflow discussion.
A textbook account of the basic theory is in Chapter 10 of
The relation to free monads is discussed in
Original references on initial algebras include
Věra Pohlová. “On sums in generalized algebraic categories.” Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 23.2 (1973): 235-251. http://eudml.org/doc/12718.
Jiří Adámek, Free algebras and automata realizations in the language of categories, Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 15.4 (1974): 589-602.
Jiří Adámek, Věra Trnková, Automata and algebras in categories Vol. 37. Springer Science & Business Media, 1990.
The observation that the categorical semantics of well-founded inductive types ($\mathcal{W}$-types) is given by initial algebras over polynomial endofunctors on the type system:
Peter Dybjer, Representing inductively defined sets by wellorderings in Martin-Löf’s type theory, Theoretical Computer Science 176 1–2 (1997) 329-335 $[$doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(96)00145-4$]$
Ieke Moerdijk, Erik Palmgren, Wellfounded trees in categories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 104 1-3 (2000) 189-218 $[$doi:10.1016/S0168-0072(00)00012-9$]$
Further discussion:
Michael Abbott, Thorsten Altenkirch, Neil Ghani, Containers: Constructing strictly positive types, Theoretical Computer Science 342 1 (2005) 3-27 $[$doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.06.002$]$
Benno van den Berg, Ieke Moerdijk, $W$-types in sheaves [arXiv:0810.2398]
Generalization to inductive families (dependent $\mathcal{W}$-types):
Nicola Gambino, Martin Hyland, Wellfounded Trees and Dependent Polynomial Functors, in: Types for Proofs and Programs TYPES 200, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3085, Springer (2004) $[$doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24849-1_14$]$
Michael Abbott, Thorsten Altenkirch, Neil Ghani: Representing Nested Inductive Types using W-types, in: Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3142, Springer (2004) $[$doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27836-8_8, pdf$]$
exposition: Inductive Types for Free – Representing nested inductive types using W-types, talk at ICALP (2004) $[$pdf$]$
Generalization to homotopy-initial algebras as categorical semantics for $\mathcal{W}$-types in homotopy type theory:
Steve Awodey, Nicola Gambino, Kristina Sojakova, Inductive types in homotopy type theory, LICS’12: (2012) 95–104 $[$arXiv:1201.3898, doi:10.1109/LICS.2012.21, Coq code$]$
Benno van den Berg, Ieke Moerdijk, W-types in Homotopy Type Theory, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 25 Special Issue 5: From type theory and homotopy theory to Univalent Foundations of Mathematics (2015) 1100-1115 $[$arXiv:1307.2765, doi:10.1017/S0960129514000516$]$
Kristina Sojakova, Higher Inductive Types as Homotopy-Initial Algebras, ACM SIGPLAN Notices 50 1 (2015) 31–42 $[$arXiv:1402.0761, doi:10.1145/2775051.2676983$]$
Steve Awodey, Nicola Gambino, Kristina Sojakova, Homotopy-initial algebras in type theory, Journal of the ACM 63 6 (2017) 1–45 $[$arXiv:1504.05531, doi:10.1145/3006383$]$
Benno van den Berg, Ieke Moerdijk, W-types in Homotopy Type Theory, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 25 Special Issue 5: From type theory and homotopy theory to Univalent Foundations of Mathematics (2015) 1100-1115 [arXiv:1307.2765, doi:10.1017/S0960129514000516]
Towards combining generalization to dependent and homotopical W-types:
Last revised on January 3, 2023 at 15:07:36. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.