Definitions
Transfors between 2-categories
Morphisms in 2-categories
Structures in 2-categories
Limits in 2-categories
Structures on 2-categories
Recall the notion of a Grothendieck fibration: a functor whose fibres are (contravariantly) functorial in .
This idea may be generalized to work in any suitable 2-category besides Cat, although if the 2-category is not strict, then one has to generalize instead the non-strict notion of Street fibrations. The generalized definition can be given in several equivalent ways, such that:
When is Cat, strict fibrations in this sense are precisely Grothendieck fibrations, while non-strict ones are precisely Street fibrations.
Fix a (non-strict) 2-category with all finite 2-limits.
For a pair of 1-morphisms and in write
for their comma object
for their 2-pullback.
A 1-morphism in is called a (non-strict) fibration when the following equivalent conditions hold:
is a Street fibration in for each , and for all in
is a morphism of fibrations.
For every morphism , the canonical map has a right adjoint in the slice 2-category .
The canonical map has a right adjoint in .
is an algebra for the 2-monad on given by .
The induced F-functor between the oplax slice F-categories has a right semi-lax F-adjoint. (See Johnstone.)
If is a strict 2-category with finite strict 2-limits, then we say that is a strict fibration when the corresponding conditions hold where “Street fibration” is replaced by “Grothendieck fibration”, slice 2-categories are replaced by strict-slice 2-categories, comma objects are replaced by strict comma objects, and 2-pullbacks are replaced by strict 2-pullbacks. In this case the 2-monad is in fact a strict 2-monad, but we do not require to be a strict algebra, only a pseudoalgebra; strict algebras for would instead be split fibrations.
Note also that the first definition makes perfect sense regardless of whether has any limits, although this is not true of the others.
By way of spelling out the first definition, we may define a 2-cell to be -cartesian if is -cartesian for every . Since this definition already incorporates stability under pullback, we can then say that is a fibration in if for every 2-cell there is a cartesian such that and .
The third definition is perhaps the simplest. Of course, it is implied by the second (take ), but the converse is also true by the pasting lemma for comma and pullback squares.
We can show that the first and third definitions are equivalent by using the representability of fibrations and adjunctions, plus the following lemma, whose proof can be found at Street fibration.
A functor is a cloven Street fibration if and only if the canonical functor has a right adjoint in .
It follows that a morphism in any 2-category is representably a fibration (i.e. satisfies the first definition) if and only if the adjunction exists in (i.e. it satisfies the third condition).
Now we connect the first three conditions with the fourth. Because is finitely complete, we may form the tricategory of spans in . In particular, is equivalent to the hom-2-category . Now recall that can be expressed as a pullback or span composite
Write . The functor is then given by composition: . To show that is a fibration iff it is an -algebra, it suffices to show
Lemma. is a colax-idempotent monad in with unit .
Proof. Write for the monoidal 2-category whose underlying 1-category is the augmented simplex category . See there for more information, but here it suffices to say this is the full sub--category of (or ) on the finite linear orders. Recall that for each is given by the -fold composite of the cospan with itself, where we take a 0-fold composite to denote the identity . Recall also that the monoidal structure on is generated by composing the cospans (together with the fact that are the initial and terminal objects).
Thus for each , there is a span , which is canonically equivalent to the -fold composite , because cotensor preserves finite limits. For the same reason, almost restricts to a monoidal 2-functor , except that does not yield a span from to . Precomposing with the functor that sends to , while and does yield a monoidal 2-functor , which by the universal property of corresponds to a unique colax-idempotent monad in .
In detail, the monoid object in is sent to the monad in , with structure maps and . Moreover, because of the adjunction in , we have in with identity unit.
It follows that is a monad, and is colax-idempotent because, for a span , we have , , and
with identity unit. It is clear, too, that the morphism as above is given by , where denotes the obvious span . Thus, by the definition of a colax-idempotent monad, a morphism carries the structure of an -algebra if and only if the unit has a right adjoint.
For a strict 2-category , let be the 2-category of strict fibrations in , morphisms of fibrations, and 2-cells between them. Then the codomain functor is a strict 2-fibration. (This is arguably an instance of the microcosm principle.)
Similarly, for any bicategory , the bicategory of weak fibrations in , morphisms of fibrations, and 2-cells admits a weak 2-fibration .
It is easy to show that a composite of fibrations is a fibration. Moreover, if denotes the 2-category of fibrations over , then we have:
A morphism in is a fibration in the 2-category iff its underlying morphism in is a fibration.
This is a standard result, at least in the case , and is apparently due to Benabou. References include (Bénabou 1985), (Hermida 1999, Section 4.3) and (Jacobs 1999, Chapter 9). Therefore, for any fibration in we have , and similarly for opfibrations. This is a fibrational 2-categorical analogue of the standard equivalence for ordinary slice categories.
Ross Street, Fibrations and Yoneda’s lemma in a 2-category, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 420, 1974, pp. 104–133. [doi:10.1007/BFb0063102]
Syméon Bozapalides. Fibrations et faisceaux dans une 2-catégorie, Archivum Mathematicum 12.4 (1976) 199-208. [10338.dmlcz/106944, pdf]
Ross Street, Fibrations in bicategories, Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques, 21 no. 2 (1980), p. 111–160 (numdam).
Mark Weber, Yoneda structure from 2-toposes, Applied Categorical Structures 15 (2007) pp259-323. doi:10.1007/s10485-007-9079-2 (author’s page)
Peter Johnstone, Fibrations and partial products in a 2-category, Applied Categorical Structures 1 (1993) pp141-179 doi:10.1007/BF00880041
Jean Bénabou, Fibered categories and the foundations of naive category theory, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50(1) (1985) pp10-37. doi:10.2307/2273784, (JSTOR)
Bart Jacobs, Categorical Logic and Type Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 141. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1999. xviii+760 pp. ISBN: 0-444-50170-3 (pdf) (contents)
Claudio Hermida, Some properties of Fib as a fibred 2-category, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 134 Issue 1 (1999) pp83-109 doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(97)00129-1, (Core)
Last revised on December 2, 2023 at 08:50:53. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.