Grothendieck introduced spaces as locally representable sheaves over a fixed site whose objects are interpreted local models. If local models are affine schemes, then algebraic schemes (and, more generally, algebraic spaces) can be considered as an example.
Given a ring , the correspondence extends to a functor . A basic result, sometimes referred to as fundamental theorem on morphisms of schemes says that there is a bijection
More precisely, for fixed , and for varying there is a restricted functor
and the functor from schemes to presheaves on is fully faithful. Thus the general schemes if defined as ringed spaces, indeed form a full subcategory of the category of presheaves on .
In fact, the theorem is more general: instead of being a scheme, we can take any locally ringed space. Thus the entire category of locally ringed spaces embeds into the category of presheaves on .
In fact, one can characterize the essential image of the category of schemes in the category of presheaves over the category of affine schemes, as the full subcategory spanned by those presheaves which are -locally representable and which are -sheaves, where is the Zariski Grothendieck topology on the category of affine schemes.
See Demazure, Gabriel for functorial approach to schemes, and relations to standard spectra.
…(Rosenberg 1998 for fundamental theorem on morphisms, and 1999 for the equivalence of two approaches)
…(Toen, Vezzosi etc.)
For the fundamental theorem of morphisms of schemes see for example Theorem 2 in MIT 18-726 AG course notes
A standard reference to the functorial approach to schemes
The fundamental theorem of morphisms of schemes has been adapted to noncommutative schemes in
Last revised on July 31, 2023 at 11:39:04. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.