higher geometry / derived geometry
Ingredients
Concepts
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
Constructions
Examples
derived smooth geometry
Theorems
Grothendieck 1965 understood spaces as locally representable sheaves over a fixed site whose objects are interpreted as local models (“functorial geometry”). If local models are affine schemes, then schemes and algebraic spaces can be considered as an example.
Given a commutative ground ring , let denote the category of schemes (over ) regarded as locally ringed topological spaces, and let denote its full subcategory of affine schemes.
The assignment which takes to the spectrum of the global sections of its structure sheaf
extends to a functor
A basic result, sometimes referred to as the fundamental theorem on morphisms of schemes, says that there is a bijection
More precisely, for a fixed scheme , and for varying there is a restriction functor
and the functor
from schemes to small presheaves on is fully faithful. Thus, schemes in the sense of ringed spaces, indeed form a full subcategory of the category of small presheaves on .
In fact, the theorem is more general: instead of being a scheme, we can take any locally ringed space. Thus the entire category of locally ringed spaces embeds into the category of small presheaves on .
One can characterize the essential image of the category of schemes in the category of small presheaves over the category of affine schemes, as the full subcategory spanned by those small presheaves that are -locally representable and are -sheaves, where is the Zariski topology on .
More precisely, let denote the category of affine schemes but now defined as the opposite category of that of commutative (unital) rings. Define the Zariski topology on as the Grothendieck topology generated by the coverage given by families
for all .
Now consider the category of small sheaves on the site , i.e., the full subcategory of the category of small presheaves on that satisfy the gluing property with respect to every covering family in the coverage.
A small presheaf is locally representable if there is a set-indexed covering family
where is the representable sheaf of an affine scheme and the morphisms are open immersions.
Open immersions of small presheaves are defined as follows. A morphism of small presheaves
is an open immersion if for every small presheaf represented by an affine scheme and every morphism
the base change
is an open immersion.
See Demazure & Gabriel 1970 for the functorial approach to schemes and its relation to locally ringed spaces.
See Rosenberg 1998 for fundamental theorem on morphisms, and 1999 for the equivalence of two approaches)
…(Toen, Vezzosi etc.)
The original observation (cf. functorial geometry):
Alexander Grothendieck: Introduction au langage fonctoriel, course in Algiers in November 1965, lecture notes by Max Karoubi [pdf scan, pdf]
Alexander Grothendieck: Introduction to functorial algebraic geometry, part 1: affine algebraic geometry, summer school in Buffalo (1973) lecture notes by Federico Gaeta [pdf scan, pdf]
Review:
English translation:
See also the MathOverflow answer:
For the fundamental theorem of morphisms of schemes in the language of locally ringed spaces see for example Theorem 2 in:
The fundamental theorem of morphisms of schemes has been adapted to noncommutative schemes in
Last revised on February 9, 2026 at 20:30:33. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.