(2,1)-quasitopos?
structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos
vector bundle, 2-vector bundle, (∞,1)-vector bundle
real, complex/holomorphic, quaternionic
For an (∞,1)-topos and any object, the over-(∞,1)-category is itself an -topos: the over--topos (the fundamental theorem of -topos theory).
If we think of as a big topos, then for we may think of (∞,1)-topos as the little topos-incarnation of . The objects of we may think of as (∞,1)-sheaves on .
This correspondence between objects of and their little-topos incarnation is entirly natural: is equivalently recovered as the (∞,1)-category whose objects are over--toposes and whose morphisms are (∞,1)-geometric morphisms over .
For an (∞,1)-topos and an object also the over-(∞,1)-category is an -topos. This is the over--topos of over .
This is HTT, prop 6.3.5.1 (1).
There is a canonical (∞,1)-geometric morphism
where the extra left adjoint is the obvious projection , and is given by forming the (∞,1)-product with .
This is called an etale geometric morphism. See there for more details.
The fact that follows from the universal property of the products. The fact that preserves (∞,1)-colimits and hence has a further right adjoint by the adjoint (∞,1)-functor theorem follows from that fact that has universal colimits.
If is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos then for all also the over--topos is locally -connected.
The composite of (∞,1)-geometric morphisms
is itself a geometric morphism. Since ∞Grpd is the terminal object in (∞,1)Topos this must be the global section geometric morphism for . Since it has the extra left adjoint it is locally -connected.
Let be the full sub-(∞,1)-category on the etale geometric morphisms . Then there is an equivalence
See etale geometric morphism for more details.
See base change geometric morphism.
We spell out how is the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves over the big site of .
The following may be seen as the presheaf version of the fundamental theorem of -topos theory.
(forming overcategories commutes with passing to presheaves)
Let be a small (∞,1)-category and a diagram. Write and for the corresponding over (∞,1)-categories, where – notationally implicitly – we use the (∞,1)-Yoneda embedding .
Then we have an equivalence of (∞,1)-categories
This appears as HTT, 5.1.6.12. For more on this see (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves.
Here we may think of as the big site of the object , hence of as presheaves on .
Let be equipped with a subcanonical coverage, let and regard as an (∞,1)-site with the big site-coverage. Then we have
By the discussion of adjoint (∞,1)-functors on over-(∞,1)-categories adjoint (∞,1)-functors we have that the adjunction
passes to an adjunction on the over-(∞,1)-categories
(where we are using that by the assumption that the coverage is subcanonical, so that the representable is a (∞,1)-sheaf), such that is still a full and faithful (∞,1)-functor (where we are using that the unit is an equivalence, since is a sheaf).
Since moreover the (∞,1)-limits in are computed as limits in over diagrams with a bottom element adjoined (as discussed at limits in over-(∞,1)-categories) it follows that with preserving all finite limits, so does .
In summary we have that is a reflective sub-(∞,1)-category of hence is the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves on the category for some (∞,1)-site-structure. But since inverts precisely those morphisms that are inverted by under the projection , it follows that this is the big site structure on (this is the defining property of the big site).
Specifically for the -topos ∞Grpd we also have the following characterization.
For ∞Grpd we have that for any ∞-groupoid the corresponding over--topos is equivalent to the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves on :
This is a special case of the (∞,1)-Grothendieck construction. See the section (∞,0)-fibrations over ∞-groupoids.
The following proposition asserts that the over--topos over an -truncated object indeed behaves like a generalized n-groupoid
For and an n-localic (∞,1)-topos, then the over--topos is -localic precisely if the object is -truncated.
This is (StrSp, lemma 2.3.16).
If is an object classifier for -small objects, then the projection regarded as an object in the slice is a -small object classifier in .
If a homotopy type theory is the internal language of , then then theory in context is the internal language of .
over-(∞,1)-topos
Some related remarks are in:
Last revised on August 20, 2022 at 15:26:25. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.