nLab
universal principal infinity-bundle

Context

Bundles

Cohomology

cohomology

Special and general types

Special notions

Variants

Extra structure

Operations

Theorems

Yoneda lemma

(,1)-Topos theory

(∞,1)-topos theory

Background

Definitions

Characterization

Morphisms

Extra stuff, structure and property

Models

Constructions

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Contents

Idea

A universal principal ∞-bundle over an ∞-group-object in an (∞,1)-topos H is a morphism EGBG in a 1-categorical model C for H (a homotopical category) such that every G-principal ∞-bundle PX in H is modeled in C by an (ordinary) pullback of EGBG.

Notice that in the proper (∞,1)-topos-context the universal G-principal ∞-bundle for an ∞-group G is nothing but the point inclusion *BG into the delooping of G: every G-principal -bundle PX is the (∞,1)-pullback

P * X BG\array{ P &\to& * \\ \downarrow &{}^{\mathllap{\simeq}}\swArrow& \downarrow \\ X &\stackrel{}{\to}& \mathbf{B}G }

of the point in H, namely the homotopy kernel of its classifying map g. In other words, in a full (,1)-categorical context the notion of universal bundle disappears. It is a notion genuinely associated with 1-categorical models for H.

Standard models

Assume that we have a homotopical category model C for H that has the structure of a category of fibrant objects. Notably this can be the full subcategory on fibrant objects of a model structure on simplicial presheaves.

By fibrations

By standard results on homotopy pullbacks every morphism EGBG that

  1. is a fibration

  2. fits into a diagram

    EG * BG BG\array{ \mathbf{E}G &\stackrel{\simeq}{\to}& * \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ \mathbf{B}'G &\stackrel{\simeq}{\to}& \mathbf{B}G }

    with the horizontal morphisms being weak equivalences;

is a model for the universal G-principal -bundle.

By path fibrations

A standard construction of a fibration EGBG is above is obtained as follows:

by standard results on homotopy pullbacks, we have that the bundle PX classified by a morphism XX^BG is given by the limit

P * (BG) I BG * BG,\array{ P &\to& &\to& * \\ \downarrow && && \downarrow \\ && (\mathbf{B}G)^I &\stackrel{\simeq}{\to}& \mathbf{B}G \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}} \\ * &\to& \mathbf{B}G } \,,

where (BG) I is a path space object for BG.

This limit may be computed as two consecutive pullbacks

P EG * (BG) I BG * BG.\array{ P &\to& \mathbf{E}G &\to& * \\ \downarrow && && \downarrow \\ && (\mathbf{B}G)^I &\to& \mathbf{B}G \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ * &\to& \mathbf{B}G } \,.

The intermediate pullback

EG:=(BG) I× BG*\mathbf{E}G := (\mathbf{B}G)^I \times_{\mathbf{B}G} *

is the path fibration over BG. By the factorization lemma we have that the projecton EGBG is indeed a fibration and by the fact that the acyclic fibration (BG) IBG is preserved under pullback that indeed EG* is a weak equivalence.

By decalage

For X a Kan complex with a single vertex, the decalage construction DecXX is a Kan fibration that fits into a diagram

DecX * X to= X.\array{ Dec X &\stackrel{\simeq}{\to}& * \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ X &\stackrel{=}{to}& X } \,.

For G a simplicial group the standard simplicial model for the delooping of G in H=∞Grpd is denoted W¯G. This is a Kan complex with a single vertex and DecW¯G is the standard model for the universal simplicial principal bundle, traditionally written WG.

DecW¯G=WGW¯G.Dec \bar W G = W G \to \bar W G \,.

These constructions are functorial and hence extend to models for (∞,1)-toposes by a model structure on simplicial presheaves.

The model WG for the universal G-principal bundle has the special property that it is a groupal model for universal principal ∞-bundles.

Revised on June 25, 2012 22:15:58 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.139.149)