nLab SL(2,O)

Contents

Idea

The concept of a special linear group SL(2,K)SL(2,K) with K=𝕆K = \mathbb{O} the octonions does not literally make sense, due to the failure of the octonions to be an associative algebra.

Nevertheless, the pattern of the special linear groups of the other three real normed division algebras suggests that for some suitably adjusted concept of “special linear group”, it should make sense to speak of SL(2,𝕆)SL(2,\mathbb{O}), after all, and that it should essentially be the spin group Spin(9,1)Spin(9,1):

exceptional spinors and real normed division algebras

Lorentzian
spacetime
dimension
AA\phantom{AA}spin groupnormed division algebra\,\, brane scan entry
3=2+13 = 2+1Spin(2,1)SL(2,)Spin(2,1) \simeq SL(2,\mathbb{R})A\phantom{A} \mathbb{R} the real numberssuper 1-brane in 3d
4=3+14 = 3+1Spin(3,1)SL(2,)Spin(3,1) \simeq SL(2, \mathbb{C})A\phantom{A} \mathbb{C} the complex numberssuper 2-brane in 4d
6=5+16 = 5+1Spin(5,1)Spin(5,1) \simeq SL(2,H)A\phantom{A} \mathbb{H} the quaternionslittle string
10=9+110 = 9+1Spin(9,1) {\simeq}SL(2,O)A\phantom{A} 𝕆\mathbb{O} the octonionsheterotic/type II string

Realizations

By Manogue, Schray & Dray

Manogue & Schray 1993 have shown how to interpret Spin(9,1)Spin(9,1) as SL(2,𝕆)SL(2,\mathbb{O}) as follows. A clear summary of these results is given by Dray & Manogue 2010, p. 4, which we follow now.

First, a warmup with the complex numbers. The space 𝔥 2()\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{C}) of 2×22 \times 2 hermitian matrices with entries in \mathbb{C} may be identified with 4-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, since the determinant is a quadratic form of signature (1,3)(1,3). (For details on this and the following identification see at geometry of physics – supersymmetry the section Spacetime in dimensions 3, 4, 6 and 10).

Any element gSL(2,)g \in \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) acts as a linear transformation of 𝔥 2()\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{C}) by conjugation:

XgXg *,X𝔥 2() X \mapsto g X g^\ast , \qquad X \in \mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{C})

and this action preserves the determinant on 𝔥 2()\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{C}), so that we obtain a group homomorphism from SL(2,)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) to O(1,3)\mathrm{O}(1,3). In fact this is a double cover from SL(2,)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) onto SO 0(1,3)SO_0(1,3). Since SL(2,)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) is simply connected, this allows us to identify SL(2,)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) with Spin(1,3)Spin(3,1)\mathrm{Spin}(1,3) \cong \mathrm{Spin}(3,1).

Following this pattern, the space 𝔥 2(𝕆)\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{O}) of 2×22 \times 2 hermitian matrices with entries in the octonions 𝕆\mathbb{O} may be identified with 10-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, since the determinant is a quadratic form of signature (1,9)(1,9).

(To note here that the usual formula for the determinant of a 2×22\times 2 matrix is indeed well-defined on elements of 𝔥 2(𝕆)\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{O}), because any octonion commutes with its conjugate.)

Let 𝕄 2(𝕆)\mathbb{M}_2(\mathbb{O}) be the set of those 2×22 \times 2 octonionic matrices all of whose entries lie in some subalgebra of 𝕆\mathbb{O} isomorphic to \mathbb{C}. Then the determinant of g𝕄 2(𝕆)g \in \mathbb{M}_2(\mathbb{O}) is well-defined by the usual formula, and furthermore (gX)g *=g(Xg *)(g X) g^\ast = g (X g^\ast) for all X𝔥 2(𝕆)X \in \mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{O}).

Now define SL(2,𝕆)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{O}) to be the subgroup of linear transformations of 𝕆 2\mathbb{O}^2 generated by those of the form

ψgψ, \psi \mapsto g \psi \,,

where g𝕄 2(𝕆)g \in \mathbb{M}_2(\mathbb{O}) has det(g)=±1det(g) = \pm 1 [Dray & Manogue 2010 (18)(].

This group acts by well-defined conjugation action on 𝔥 2(𝕆)\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{O}) via

X(gX)g *=g(Xg *),X𝔥 2(𝕆), X \mapsto (g X) g^\ast = g (X g^\ast) , \qquad X \in \mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{O}) \,,

and this action preserves the determinant on 𝔥 2(𝕆)\mathfrak{h}_2(\mathbb{O}). This construction gives a group homomorphism from SL(2,𝕆)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{O}) to O(1,9)\mathrm{O}(1,9) which turns out to be a double cover. This shows that SL(2,𝕆)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{O}) as defined above is isomorphic Spin(1,9)Spin(9,1)\mathrm{Spin}(1,9) \cong \mathrm{Spin}(9,1).

By Hitchin

Another proposal for making sense of SL(2,𝕆)SL(2,\mathbb{O}) is due to Hitchin. In this approach, “SL(2,𝕆)SL(2,\mathbb{O})” is a submanifold of “GL(2,𝕆)GL(2,\mathbb{O})”, which is an open orbit of Spin(9,1)×GL(2,)Spin(9,1) \times GL(2,\mathbb{R}) on S 2{S} \otimes \mathbb{R}^2. Here S{S} is the 16-dimensional spin representation of Spin(9,1)Spin(9,1); this may be identified with 𝕆 2\mathbb{O}^2.

References

Last revised on October 1, 2025 at 16:31:26. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.