nLab concretification

Context

Discrete and concrete objects

Cohesive \infty-Toposes

Contents

Idea

In a local topos there is a notion of concrete objects. These form a reflective subcategory. The corresponding reflector is the concretification map which universally approximates any object by a concrete object.

Definition

A local topos is a topos equipped with a sharp modality \sharp.

Definition

For XX any object of the topos, the image projection of the unit η X :XX\eta^{\sharp}_X \colon X \to \sharp X is the concretification of XX

(1)(X 1X)(Xim(η X )). (X \to \sharp_1 X) \coloneqq \big( X \twoheadrightarrow im(\eta^\sharp_X) \big) \,.

Properties

Lemma


Given a morphism f:XYf \colon X \longrightarrow Y into a concrete object YY, in that Y 1YY \overset{\sim}{\twoheadrightarrow} \sharp_1 Y , it factors uniquely through the concretification unit η X \eta^\sharp_X, so that we have a natural bijection of hom-sets

YconcreteHom( 1X,Y)(X 1X) *Hom(X,Y). Y\;\text{concrete} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; \Rightarrow \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; Hom\big( \sharp_1 X ,\, Y \big) \xrightarrow[\sim]{\phantom{--} \big( X \twoheadrightarrow \sharp_1 X \big)^\ast \phantom{--}} Hom\big( X ,\, Y \big) \mathrlap{\,.}

Proof

This is a special case of the functoriality of image factorization:

Consider the following diagram of given solid arrows, which commutes by naturality of the \sharp -unit and where we show the (epi,mono)-factorization of the vertical maps through their images, hence through the concretifications (1):

By construction, the top left morphism is thus an epimorphism and the bottom right is a morphism, as shown. Therefore the orthogonality of the (epi,mono) factorization system implies that there exists a unique dashed lift as shown

References

General

(…)

Of smooth sets

On concretification in the cohesive topos of smooth sets, taking values in diffeological spaces:

Last revised on October 4, 2025 at 17:06:16. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.