homotopy hypothesis-theorem
delooping hypothesis-theorem
stabilization hypothesis-theorem
category object in an (∞,1)-category, groupoid object
There are several unrelated generalizations of the concept of a Segal space which might be thought of as “higher Segal spaces”. For example, one might discuss
-fold Segal spaces, a model for -categories.
-uple Segal spaces?, a model for cubical -categories.
-Segal spaces in the sense of Dyckerhoff and Kapranov, a model for something like an -category, but without uniqueness of composites (for ) and with higher associativity only in dimension and above.
This article discusses -Segal spaces in the sense of Dyckerhoff and Kapranov.
There are several ways to think about -Segal spaces:
A -Segal space is a Segal space, i.e. a simplicial space satisfying the Segal condition. We think of the Segal condition in the following way. For every subdivision of an interval into subintervals , and for any choice of labelings of the endpoints of these intervals by objects , and any choice of labelings of the intervals , the Segal condition provides us with a “composite” labeling of the whole interval , in a coherent way. “Coherence” here means that the composition is continuous in the ‘s, but moreover that it is associative: if we compose our labelings in two steps, for example, we get the same result as if we compose our labelings in one step: .
A -Segal space is, like a -Segal space, a simplicial space, but it satisfies only a weakened version of the Segal condition. Instead of stipulating that labelings of triangualtions of 1-dimensional intervals may be coherently composed, we stipulate that labelings of triangulations of 2-dimensional polygons may be coherently composed.
Similarly -Segal spaces are simplicial spaces with higher associativity data parameterized by triangulations of -dimensional polyhedra.
A 2-Segal space is a “category with multivalued composition”, or a category enriched in Span. A composite of two morphisms need not exist, and if it does it may not be unique. But whatever composites there are satisfy all “higher associativity conditions” one could want.
In (DyckerhoffKapranov 12) a 2-Segal space is defined to be a simplicial space with a higher analog of the weak composition operation known from Segal spaces.
Let be a simplicial topological space or bisimplicial set or generally a simplicial object in a suitable simplicial model category.
For let be the -polygon. For any triangulation of let be the corresponding simplicial set. Regarding as the cellular boundary of that polygon provides a morphism of simplicial sets .
Say that is a 2-Segal object if for all and all as above, the induced morphisms
are weak equivalences.
Warning. A Dyckerhoff-Kapranov “2-Segal spaces” is not itself a model for an (∞,2)-category. Instead, it is a model for an (∞,1)-operad (Dyckerhoff-Kapranov 12, section 3.6).
Under some conditions DW 2-Segal spaces induce Hall algebra structures on (Dyckerhoff-Kapranov 12, section 8).
A central motivating example comes from -theory. If is a Quillen-exact category, then is a 2-Segal space. Here is the Waldhausen S-construction. There is one object of , denoted . There is a morphism for each object of . A composite of in of two objects is an object equipped with a short exact sequence . Thus the composite is generally not unique, but it does satisfy all the higher associativity conditions required of a 2-Segal space.
For more references along these lines do not see at n-fold complete Segal space – that is a different concept.
The Dyckerhoff-Kapranov “higher Segal spaces” above are discussed in
Tashi Walde, On the theory of higher Segal spaces, thesis, Brexen 2020 pdf
Matthew B. Young, Relative 2-Segal spaces, Algebraic & Geometric Topology 18 (2018) 975-1039 [doi:10.2140/agt.2018.18.975]
We introduce a relative version of the 2–Segal simplicial spaces defined by Dyckerhoff and Kapranov, and Gálvez-Carrillo, Kock and Tonks. Examples of relative 2–Segal spaces include the categorified unoriented cyclic nerve, real pseudoholomorphic polygons in almost complex manifolds and the -construction from Grothendieck–Witt theory. We show that a relative 2–Segal space defines a categorical representation of the Hall algebra associated to the base 2–Segal space. In this way, after decategorification we recover a number of known constructions of Hall algebra representations. We also describe some higher categorical interpretations of relative 2–Segal spaces.
The notion of unital 2-Segal space is also discovered independently under the name of a decomposition space in
There are many sequels including
See also
Last revised on July 23, 2024 at 13:09:44. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.