nLab nilpotent completion of spectra

Redirected from "nilpotent completion".
Contents

under construction

Contents

Idea

Given a spectrum XX, and a ring spectrum EE, then the EE-nilpotent completion of XX at EE is, for any choice X •→XX_\bullet \to X of EE-Adams tower, the homotopy limit lim⟵X •\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} X_\bullet over that tower (Ravenel 84, def. 1.13).

Under certain finiteness conditions (see below), but not generally, this is equivalent to the EE-Bousfield localization L EXL_E X (which, in turn, is in special cases given by formal completion, see at fracture theorem).

The EE-Adams spectral sequence induced by the given Adams tower conditionally converges to the EE-nilpotent completion.

Definition

Bousfield’s definition

Definition

Let (E,μ,e)(E, \mu, e) be a homotopy commutative ring spectrum (def.) and Y∈Ho(Spectra)Y \in Ho(Spectra) any spectrum. Write E¯\overline{E} for the homotopy fiber of the unit 𝕊→eE\mathbb{S}\overset{e}{\to} E as in this def. such that the EE-Adams filtration of YY (def.) reads (according to this lemma)

⋮ ↓ E¯ 3∧Y ↓ E¯ 2∧Y ↓ E¯∧Y ↓ Y. \array{ \vdots \\ \downarrow \\ \overline{E}^3 \wedge Y \\ \downarrow \\ \overline{E}^2 \wedge Y \\ \downarrow \\ \overline{E} \wedge Y \\ \downarrow \\ Y } \,.

For n∈ℕn \in \mathbb{N}, write

E¯ n≔hocof(E¯ n+1⟶i n+1𝕊) \overline{E}_n \coloneqq hocof( \overline{E}^{n+1} \overset{i^{n+1}}{\longrightarrow} \mathbb{S})

for the homotopy cofiber. Here E¯ 0≃0\overline{E}_0 \simeq 0. By the tensor triangulated structure of Ho(Spectra)Ho(Spectra) (prop.), this homotopy cofiber is preserved by forming smash product with YY, and so also

E¯ n∧Y≃hocof(E¯ n∧Y⟶Y). \overline{E}_n \wedge Y \simeq hocof( \overline{E}^n \wedge Y \overset{}{\longrightarrow} Y) \,.

Now let

E¯ s⟶p s−1E¯ s−1 \overline{E}_s \overset{p_{s-1}}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_{s-1}

be the morphism implied by the octahedral axiom of the triangulated category Ho(Spectra)Ho(Spectra) (def., prop.):

E¯ s+1 ⟶i E¯ s ⟶ E∧E¯ s ⟶ ΣE¯ s+1 =↓ ↓ i s ↓ ↓ E¯ s+1 ⟶ 𝕊 ⟶ E¯ s ⟶ ΣE¯ s+1 ↓ ↓ p s−1 E¯ s−1 ⟶= E¯ s−1 ↓ ↓ ΣE¯ s ⟶ ΣE∧E¯ s. \array{ \overline{E}^{s+1} &\overset{i}{\longrightarrow}& \overline{E}^s &\longrightarrow& E \wedge \overline{E}^s &\longrightarrow& \Sigma \overline{E}^{s+1} \\ {}^{\mathllap{=}}\downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{i^s}} && \downarrow^{} && \downarrow \\ \overline{E}^{s+1} &\longrightarrow& \mathbb{S} &\longrightarrow& \overline{E}_s &\longrightarrow& \Sigma \overline{E}^{s+1} \\ && \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{p_{s-1}}} \\ && \overline{E}_{s-1} &\overset{=}{\longrightarrow}& \overline{E}_{s-1} \\ && \downarrow && \downarrow \\ && \Sigma \overline{E}^s &\longrightarrow& \Sigma E \wedge \overline{E}^s } \,.

By the commuting square in the middle and using again the tensor triangulated structure, this yields an inverse sequence under YY:

Y≃𝕊∧Y⟶⋯⟶p 3∧idE¯ 3∧Y⟶p 2∧idE¯ 2∧Y⟶p 1∧idE¯ 1∧Y Y \simeq \mathbb{S} \wedge Y \longrightarrow \cdots \overset{p_3 \wedge id}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_3 \wedge Y \overset{p_2 \wedge id}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_2 \wedge Y \overset{p_1 \wedge id}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_1 \wedge Y

The E-nilpotent completion Y E ∧Y^\wedge_E of YY is the homotopy limit over the resulting inverse sequence

Y E ∧≔ℝlim⟵ nE¯ n∧Y Y^\wedge_E \coloneqq \mathbb{R}\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim}_n \overline{E}_n \wedge Y

or rather the canonical morphism into it

Y⟶Y E ∧. Y \longrightarrow Y^\wedge_E \,.

Concretely, if

Y≃𝕊∧Y⟶⋯⟶p 3∧idE¯ 3∧Y⟶p 2∧idE¯ 2∧Y⟶p 1∧idE¯ 1∧Y Y \simeq \mathbb{S} \wedge Y \longrightarrow \cdots \overset{p_3 \wedge id}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_3 \wedge Y \overset{p_2 \wedge id}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_2 \wedge Y \overset{p_1 \wedge id}{\longrightarrow} \overline{E}_1 \wedge Y

is presented by a tower of fibrations between fibrant spectra in the model structure on topological sequential spectra, then Y E ∧Y^\wedge_E is represented by the ordinary sequential limit over this tower.

(Bousfield 79, top, middle and bottom of page 272)

As the totalization of the cosimplicial spectrum

Definition

Given a E-infinity ring spectrum EE, its corresponding cosimplicial spectrum is the augmented cosimplicial spectrum

E •≔(𝕊⟶eE⟵μ⟶id∧e⟶e∧idE∧E⟶id∧e∧id⟵id∧μ⟵μ∧id⟶e∧id⟶id∧eE∧E∧E⋯). E^\bullet \;\coloneqq\; \left( \mathbb{S} \overset{e}{\longrightarrow} E \underoverset {\underset{id \wedge e}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{e \wedge id}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\mu}{\longleftarrow}} E \wedge E \underoverset {\underset{e \wedge id}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{id \wedge e}{\longrightarrow}} { \underoverset {\underset{id \wedge \mu}{\longleftarrow}} {\overset{\mu \wedge id}{\longleftarrow}} {\overset{id \wedge e \wedge id}{\longrightarrow}} } E \wedge E \wedge E \cdots \right) \,.

(This is the formal dual of the Cech nerve of Spec(E)→Spec(𝕊)Spec(E) \to Spec(\mathbb{S}) in the opposite category, where we write Spec(E)Spec(E) for the object EE regarded in the opposite category.)

Moreover, for X∈Ho(Spectra)X \in Ho(Spectra) any spectrum, then there is the corresponding augmented cosimiplicial spectrum E •∧XE^\bullet \wedge X.

Proposition

Given an E-infinity ring spectrum EE and any spectrum XX, then the EE-nilpotent completion X E ∧X^\wedge_E (according to def. ) is equivalently the homotopy limit

X E ∧ ≃Tot(E •∧X) =holim← n∈Δ(E n∧X) ≃holim← n∈ℕTot n(E •∧X) \begin{aligned} X^\wedge_E &\simeq Tot(E^\bullet \wedge X) \\ & = \underset{\leftarrow}{holim}_{n \in \Delta} (E^n\wedge X) \\ & \simeq \underset{\leftarrow}{holim}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}Tot^n(E^\bullet \wedge X) \end{aligned}

over the tower of homotopy-totalizations of the skeleta of the cosimplicial spectrum E •⊗YE^\bullet \otimes Y (def. ).

This claim originates in (Hopkins 99, remark 5.5 (ii)). It is taken for granted in (Lurie 10, lecture 8, lecture 30). The first published proof is (Mathew-Naumann-Noel 15, prop. 2.14). See also (Carlsson 07, e.g. remark 3.1).

Remark

Prop. implies that the EE-Adams spectral sequence may equivalently be regarded as computing descent of quasicoherent infinity-stacks in E-infinity geometry along the canonical morphisms Spec(E)⟶Spec(E)\longrightarrow Spec(S). See at Adams spectral sequence – As derived descent.

Properties

Relation to EE-localization

Remark

There is a canonical map

L EX⟶lim← n(E ∧ S n+1∧ SX) L_E X \overset{}{\longrightarrow} \underset{\leftarrow}{\lim}_n (E^{\wedge^{n+1}_S}\wedge_S X)

from the EE-Bousfield localization of spectra of XX into the totalization.

We consider now conditions for this morphism to be an equivalence.

Definition

For RR a ring, its core cRc R is the equalizer in

cR⟶R⟶⟶R⊗R. c R \longrightarrow R \stackrel{\longrightarrow}{\longrightarrow} R \otimes R \,.
Proposition

Let EE be a connective E-∞ ring such that the core of π 0(E)\pi_0(E), def. , is either of

  • the localization of the integers at a set JJ of primes, cπ 0(E)≃ℤ[J −1]c \pi_0(E) \simeq \mathbb{Z}[J^{-1}];

  • ℤ n\mathbb{Z}_n for n≥2n \geq 2.

Then the map in remark is an equivalence

L EX⟶≃lim← n(E ∧ S n+1∧ SX). L_E X \stackrel{\simeq}{\longrightarrow} \underset{\leftarrow}{\lim}_n (E^{\wedge^{n+1}_S}\wedge_S X) \,.

(Bousfield 79).

Examples

The nilpotent completion of a connective spectrum at the Eilenberg-MacLane spectrum HℤH \mathbb{Z}, happens to be the spectrum itself (by a Postnikov tower argument).

Examples

For XX a connective spectrum, its H𝔽 pH \mathbb{F}_p-nilpotent completion is the formal completion X p ∧X^{\wedge}_p.

The MU-nilpotent completion of any connective spectrum XX is XX.

The BP-nilpotent completion at prime pp of any connective spectrum XX is X (p)X_{(p)}.

(Ravenel 84, example 1.16)

References

The concept originates with

  • Aldridge Bousfield, The localization of spectra with respect to homology, Topology 18 (1979), no. 4, 257–281. (pdf)

  • Douglas Ravenel, Localization with respect to certain periodic homology theories, American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 106, No. 2, (Apr., 1984), pp. 351-414 (pdf)

The re-interpretation in terms of totalization of the cosimplicial spectrum is briefly mentioned in

  • Mike Hopkins, section 4 of Complex oriented cohomology theories and the language of stacks, course notes 1999 (pdf)

and tacitly assumed in

A proof of the equivalence of this re-interpretation appears in

See also

Last revised on April 25, 2025 at 14:10:43. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.