category with duals (list of them)
dualizable object (what they have)
ribbon category, a.k.a. tortile category
monoidal dagger-category?
Recall that a rig is a ‘ring without negatives’: a monoid object in the monoidal category of commutative monoids with the usual tensor product. Categorifying this notion, we obtain various notions of 2-rig. One of these, in which both “addition” and “multiplication” are represented by abstract monoidal structures, is the notion of rig category, also known as a bimonoidal category.
A typical example would be the groupoid of finite sets and bijections, with disjoint union playing the role of addition and cartesian product playing the role of multiplication. This rig category can be thought of as a categorification of the set of natural numbers. Note that in this example, disjoint union is not the categorical coproduct, and product of sets is not the categorical product (because we are working in the groupoid of finite sets).
A rig category, or bimonoidal category, $C$ is a category with a symmetric monoidal structure $(C,\oplus,0)$ for addition and a monoidal structure $(C, \otimes, I)$ for multiplication, together with left and right distributivity natural isomorphisms
and absorption/annihilation isomorphisms
satisfying a set of coherence laws worked out in (Laplaza 72) and (Kelly74).
Note that these authors used the term ‘ring category’. We take the liberty of switching to ‘rig category’ because it is typical for these to lack additive inverses.
While a rig can have the extra property of being commutative (i.e. of its multiplication being commutative), a rig category can have the extra structure of (its monoidal structure $\otimes$) being braided (compatibly with the distributive laws) and may then have the further property of being symmetric.
Rig categories are part of the hierarchy of distributivity for monoidal structures.
If $\oplus$ is the categorical coproduct and $\otimes$ is the categorical product, then we have the notion of a distributive category, which is a special case of a rig category. For example, the category Set of sets, as well as any topos, is a distributive category, hence a rig category with $\times$ and $+$.
In between, we have the notion of distributive monoidal category, where $\oplus$ is the coproduct but $\otimes$ is an abstract monoidal structure. Examples of this sort include Ab, $R$Mod, Vect and Vect(X):
Ab, the category of abelian groups equipped with the tensor product of abelian groups
$R$Mod, the category of modules over a commutative ring $R$, equipped with the tensor product of modules
$k$Vect = $k$Mod, the category of vector space over some field $k$, equipped with the tensor product of vector spaces,
$k$Vect(X), the category of (topological) vector bundles for $X$ some (topological) space, equipped with the tensor product of vector bundles.
In all these cases the coproduct is the respective direct sum (e.g. direct sum of vector bundles in the last case).
Using the correct definition of the 2-category of symmetric rig categories, the groupoid $FinSet^{\times}$ of finite sets and bijections is the initial symmetric rig category, just as $\N$ is the initial commutative rig. Note that a suitably weakened concept of ‘initial’ is needed here; see 2-limit. In other words, given any symmetric rig category $R$, there is a unique symmetric rig morphism $FinSet^{\times} \to R$, up to an equivalence which is itself unique up to an isomorphism which is actually unique (up to equality).
distributivity for monoidal structures
If the distributivity morphisms are not invertible, then we have the notion of colax-distributive rig category.
The notion of a bipermutative category is a strictification of the notion of symmetric rig category. Every symmetric rig category is equivalent to a bipermutative category ([May, prop. VI 3.5]). Similarly, every rig category is equivalent to a strict rig category (Guillou, theorem 1.2).
The coherence for the distributivity law in bimonoidal categories has been given in
where these categories are called ring categories. Discussion with an eye towers the K-theory of a bipermutative category is in