geometric representation theory
representation, 2-representation, ∞-representation
Grothendieck group, lambda-ring, symmetric function, formal group
principal bundle, torsor, vector bundle, Atiyah Lie algebroid
Eilenberg-Moore category, algebra over an operad, actegory, crossed module
In representation theory, the notion of twisted intertwiners is a generalization of that of intertwiners.
References using the terminology “twisted intertwiner” include Fuchs & Schweigert 2000a (7.2), 2000b (2.2), Felder, Fröhlich, Fuchs & Schweigert 2000 (4.7), but the notion itself is probably older and may (or may not) be known under other names.
For a group consider its linear representations , on vector spaces , with .
For a pair of linear representation respectively (all this generalizes straightforwardly to algebras and their modules), a twisted intertwiner
is
a linear map ,
an automorphism of the group
such that
Moreover, given a pair of consecutive twisted intertwiners , their composition is given by the direct product form
This reduces to the ordinary notion of intertwiners in the case that the automorphism is the identity map, .
There naturally are higher order morphisms between twisted intertwiners (these seem not to have been considered in the literature and do not carry an established name — we here refer to them as “deformations”, just to have a word):
Given a parallel pair of twisted intertwiners , then a deformation between these
is such that
(where “” denotes the adjoint action of a group on itself by inner automorphisms, )
and
Conversely, if is a twisted intertwiner, and , then also
is a twisted intertwiner:
In other words, the group acts on the hom-sets of twisted intertwiners by deformations.
For linear representations , , deformation (Def. ) of twisted intertwiners is an equivalence relation, and composition of twisted intertwiners (2) passes to its equivalence classes.
That we have an equvalence relation is clear. To see that it is respected by composition, consider
with
and
another , then
because:
and
another , then we have
immediately:
and
This means that
there is a 2-category of representations, twisted intertwiners and deformations
with a homotopy category of representations and deformation classes of twisted intertwiners.
This becomes manifest by recasting the original component definition (1) of twisted intertwiners as characterizing certain slice morphisms in Cat, to be discussed below.
We discuss how the properties of twisted intertwiners above becomes manifest when understanding them as a natural construction in category theory, via slices of the 2-category Cat of categories, functors and natural transformations:
Writing for the delooping groupoid of and for the category of vector spaces (over a given ground field), the ordinary category Rep of -representations and ordinary intertwiners between these is equivalently the functor category
In contrast, the category of -representations with twisted intertwiners between them is the iso-comma (2,1)-category between (on the left the delooping of the automorphism 2-group of ) and , whose 1-morphisms are diagrams in Grpd of this form:
hence natural transformations
whose commuting naturality square is equivalent to the component equation (1),
and whose composition by whiskering
is the natural transformation
which reflects the composition law (2),
while the 2-morphisms are the evident paper-cup pasting diagrams
where
gives the relation (3),
from to the whiskered (now on the other side) composite transformation
exhibiting the relation (4).
The component-definition (1) is considered (broadly in a context of 2d CFT) in:
Jürgen Fuchs, Christoph Schweigert: Symmetry breaking boundaries II. More structures; examples, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 543-593 [arXiv:hep-th/9908025, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00669-0]
Giovanni Felder, Jürg Fröhlich, Jürgen Fuchs, Christoph Schweigert: The geometry of WZW branes, J. Geom. Phys. 34 (2000) 162-190 [doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(99)00061-3, arXiv:hep-th/9909030]
Jürgen Fuchs, Christoph Schweigert: Lie algebra automorphisms in conformal field theory, in Conference on Infinite Dimensional Lie Theory and Conformal Field Theory (May 2000) [arXiv:math/0011160]
Last revised on April 3, 2025 at 12:00:10. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.