symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
monoid theory in algebra:
A zero-divisor is something that, like zero itself, when multiplied by something possibly nonzero still produces zero as a product.
Let be a absorption monoid (such as a commutative ring or any ring).
An element of is a non-zero-divisor if, whenever or , then .
An element is a zero-divisor if there exists such that or .
By this definition, zero itself is a zero-divisor if and only if is non-trivial (see too simple to be simple)
Alternatively, one can define a zero-divisor using a weakened version of negation from Lombardi & Quitté 2010 in the definition of zero divisor:
An element is a zero-divisor if there exists an element such that if then , and or .
By this definition, zero itself is also a zero divisor in the trivial monoid.
By the antithesis interpretation of constructive mathematics we want to be an arbitrary irreflexive symmetric relation and we want the monoid operation to be strongly extensional with respect to as well. We also say that is a strong non-zero-divisor if, whenever , then and .
If is (or may be) non-commutative, then we may distinguish left and right (non)-zero-divisors in the usual way.
An integral domain is precisely a commutative ring (whose multiplicative monoid is an absorption monoid by definition) in which zero is the unique zero-divisor of the multiplicative monoid of the commutative ring (or constructively, in which the strong non-zero-divisors are precisely the strong non-zero elements in the multiplicative monoid, that is those elements such that ).
The non-zero-divisors of any absorption monoid form a monoid under multiplication, which may be denoted . Note that if happens to be a field, then this agrees with the usual notation for the group of invertible elements of the multiplicative monoid , but is not a group in general. (We may use or for the group of invertible elements.)
If is any ideal of , then we can generalise from a zero-divisor to an -divisor. In a way, this is nothing new; is an -divisor in if and only if is a zero-divisor in . Ultimately, this is related to the notion of divisor in algebraic geometry.
Last revised on January 18, 2025 at 19:53:44. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.