Archive of changes made during May 2009. The substantive content of this page should not be altered. For past versions of this page beyond its own history, start here and work backwards.
added to distributor the description in terms of colimit preserving functors on presheaf categories and added corresponding remarks at the beginning of symmetric monoidal (infinity,1)-category of presentable (infinity,1)-categories
Toby Bartels: Last night, I made some lists of entries relevant to constructive mathematics, starting with the back links and classifying them. (Hopefully the third list will become so large that we can't really use it, but for now I want to keep track of which entries have that material.)
David created extended natural numbers, corecursion, and coalgebra for an endofunctor. Moved proof of terminal coalgebra being fixed point to terminal coalgebra. ‘Coalgebra’ still needs disambiguation.
created path integral
added to sieve a – potentially long-winded – lemma with detailed proof that spells out details of the fact that every subfunctor is the coimage of a morphism out of a coproduct of representables
created separated presheaf
further worked on the section “in terms of geometric embedding” at sheaf
expanded and restructured sieve – introduced the explicit distinction between the notion of sieve and that of subfunctor and made their bijection explicit: this seems to be the standard way that “sieve” is used in the literature: authors don’t seem to say “sieve” synonymously with “subfunctor”, but say “sieve” if they explicitly mean the set of elements of the subfunctor. There is a bijection, but not an equality of concepts.
edited and replied at semisimple category
Zoran Skoda: as far as google (and other search machine’s) counterarguments of Toby (see down 22. may) I still disagree. I do care if our stuff is well indexed and hence better used by anybody looking for answer at the google including us; and I do not care about vanity issues of pro or contra google movements. If somebody gets directed to a less relevant page this is creating noise, and showing a less convenient side of our work. If effectivity is not important why are we doing this ?
Todd: Added a section “morphisms of manifolds” to manifold which attempts to enlarge the notion of pseudogroup, so as to get general notions of map for general notions of manifold. However, this is “original research” and should be vetted – I don’t see the enlarged notion (or an equivalent) in any of the literature I’ve read.
Bruce: started/added material to some pages related to fusion categories, like fusion category, Pivotal symbols (this name needs to be changed to fit the naming conventions), semisimple category and rigid monoidal category.
started expanding sheaf – my goal is (as now indicated) to give a full derivation of how a geometric morphism into a presheaf category defines a Grothendieck topology and sheaves with respect to that – but my machine’s battery runs low and will leave me offline any minute now, so will have to continue later (darn technology…)
created a stub for fusion category
created a stub for String field theory
Created Banach spaces. I need to at least describe products and coproducts in .
Another example, Banach spaces, at internal hom.
Looking at other things that Urs has done, the problem may be this: If you want to put an equation within a bullet list, then you either have to put no blank lines between the equation and the surrounding text
or put enough spacing before the equation to match the indentation of the list
or, of course, both
but it will fall outside of the bullet list if you do neither
Zoran Škoda: created comorphism (in sheaf theory); there is hard to find a sensible and comprehensive account in the literature. Note that the treatment is more general than in the usage for the case of ringed spaces. By the way, the server is very erratic tonight, and having sometimes responses delayed by 5-10 minutes. On the other hand I strongly disagree with the changes of the names of entries massively being done today by Eric: he moves infinity-category into -category. Though this is graphically appealing, google and others put higher in search results items which have search name in the title, and the entries they index are index basically by the ascii. I want to see nlab entries high in the google search, this makes our effort more useful. Fancy graphics can be WITHIN the entry, and prefereably in this decade still not in the title. I would do the redirects in the symbol variant of the title instead!! What the others think ?
I tried to fix the query box layout at Tychonoff theorem only to find that there is apparently some software clash between the query box syntax and some symbols used. So I “rolled back”. Hopefully the entry is now again in the form that Todd and Body left it. Please check.
started filling something into n-categorical physics just so the page looks less blank – but didn’t really have the energy or intention to produce anything of more than vaguely suggestive nature so far
David added exposition references to pure motive
Chris started work on section 5 of BZFN for the journal club on geometric -function theory.
added a short section Basic idea in three words to the beginning of geometric infinity-function theory, as I noticed that this simple introductory statement was not sufficiently amplified in the existing introductory section
thanks to Toby for (in particular) his editorial work! it doesn’t go unnoticed, is much appreciated
added an “Idea”-section to homotopy category and added the precise definition of the universality condition on
expanded local isomorphism: more about sieves, more about pullbacks – but needs polishing
created commutativity of limits and colimits as a place to list results such as commutativity of filtered colimits with finite limits;
added some bits to subobject classifier: a short intro, the realization in presheaf topoi and a paragraph on -catgorical generalizations and the interpretation of as a -category.
created power object, which is mentioned in the alternative definition at topos – guessed the definition from the Axiom of power sets at Trimble on ETCS I, but I am not really sure – somebody please have a look and check
expanded and restructured Grothendieck topos
added what should be a detailed proof to geometric embedding that for every geometric embedding the category is equivalent to the localization of at the morphisms that are sent by to isos
added a paragraph to localization describing and emphasizing the point that lots of localizations one runs into in practice are reflective subcategories or actually geometric embeddings. In particular Bousfield localization presents the corresponding reflective (infinity,1)-subcategory. I am still not really satisfied with the entry localization, though, I am hoping we can eventually present the conceptual basis here more clearly. After all, the perspective on sheaves and sheafification in terms of localization/geometric embedding has been shown to be the workable road to -stacks, which, as tradition has it, are well worth pursuing in general and on an Lab in particular :-) It is curious that there seems to be a cultural divide in the literature here: the book by Kashiwara-Schapira for instance amplifies sheafification as localization, which paves the road for -stacks presented by the model structure on simplicial presheaves, while the book by MacLane-Moerdijk amplifies sheafification as geometric embedding, which paves the road for the simple definition of (infinity,1)-sheafification by reflective (infinity,1)-subcategory. Lurie’s book effectively gives the unified perspective, which I think is worthwhile presenting very clearly here on the Lab, since it is coceptually so simple and transparent and in practice so powerful. Over.
added example to localization of a simplicial model category
Toby Bartels: An extensive rewrite and expansion of predicative mathematics, including material on the non-constructive school (which rejects function sets), thanks to reading sparked by one of Jonathan’s posts to the Café.
created derived smooth manifold, but will have to continue tomorrow
Toby Bartels: I moved all of the SVG out of article pages and into included subpages as described at HowTo. (Note that this is supposed to be a temporary fix until we get a working automated system to include somehthing like TikZ; see the discussion.)
added more details to and slightly restructured exact functor
after reading it I got the idea that Toby’s latest addition to stuff, structure, property is really about higher subobject classifiers as discussed at generalized universal bundle. I added corresponding remarks, but didn’t find the time to look into this very carefully.
Andrew: (I forget whether I’m supposed to add this to my earlier comment, or here, or add a word of this to each of the other entries of the day). I’ve created SVG Sandbox expressly for the purpose of mucking about with SVGs to get them to look right. My rationale is explained at the top of that page, together with some suggestions on how it might work. The point is that one SVG can be rather large and I think that putting them in the regular Sandbox to test stuff is a bit anti-social. Hopefully we can get stuff in the FAQ and HowTo on good ways of importing SVGs as there seem to be a few “special features”. I’ve shifted the recent SVG-related stuff from the original Sandbox to the SVG Sandbox, but I shifted the discussion that Bruce started to the nForum.
Andrew: Finished off the heuristic shift. Bizarrely, one page, local system, comes up in the Instiki search as having “heuristic” in it but I can’t find it. The other instances of “heuristic” that are left are either correct or within discussions.
added explicitly the description in terms of weighted (co)limits and in terms of (co)ends to Kan extension; also reorganized the existing material somewhat.
added the definition of composition to enriched functor category;
thanks to Andrew for the thing about “heuristic”. I’ll be aware of that in the future.
Toby Bartels: Reply to Andrew below:
category: redirectrather than as
category: delete, since it contains edit history that we want to preserve. (Instiki has no cool page-move feature like MediaWiki does.) As you did, I also usually decline to change links from discussion.
Heuristically altered records containing the word “heuristic”. The original list of records matching the search term “heuristic” is below (so anyone worried can check what I’ve done). Most actually were references to heuristic introduction to sheaves, cohomology and higher stacks which obviously needs to be renamed before the other pages are changed (what’s the best way to rename a page? Is it: create a new one, copy over the content, put in a redirect, change all referring pages, mark old one for delete? Or is there a simpler way?). In a couple of the others the word was used in a discussion so I didn’t change those. One I even left as I thought it was (almost) correctly used!
worked on end: added a section “End as equalizer” where I try to motivate the formula for the end over -valued functors from the equalizer formula for limits, then give the equalizer formula for ends – personally I find this a bit more helpful than dinatural transformations, but that is certainly just my ignorance – I added an “Idea” and a “References” and an “Examples” section
added the definition to enriched category (yes, that was still “left as an exercise”)
further expanded section 2 of geometric infinity-function theory, which I am to “report” on next Monday in our Journal Club.
finally created simplicial nerve of simplicial categories, but more details necessary
am trying to find out, for A-infinity ring and E-infinity ring to which extent the two definitions “algebra over an -operad” and “algebra object in a monoidal -category” are equivalent, as one would expect
created symmetric monoidal (infinity,1)-category, commutative algebra in an (infinity,1)-category, smash product of spectra, associative ring spectrum, A-infinity ring, commutative ring spectrum, E-infinity ring
expanded the intro at higher algebra a bit
Created lax 2-adjunction, complete with spiffy PNGs.
Added some links at Gray-adjointness-for-2-categories to entries on concepts in the book. Some of these are to non-existent pages like lax natural transformation. Do pages on ‘elementary’ stuff like this belong here on nLab, or should we add them to Wikipedia and link there?
Jonas Frey?: The problem about lax natural transformations is that there is no consensus about the orientation of constraints in the literature. Johnstone in the elephant and Gurski in his PhD-thesis for example use an other orientation than Leinster and Borceux in their books.
Toby: All the more reason to write an article to explain the differences!
created new top-level link list Higher Algebra – to be filled with content
considerably expanded (infinity,1)-category – motivation was really to write relation between quasi-categories and simplicial categories, but then ran out of steam
removed all existing logs here and archived them as 2009 April changes