nLab
concrete smooth infinity-groupoid

This is a sub-entry of smooth ∞-groupoid -- structures. See there for more context.


Context

Cohesive -Toposes

cohesive topos

cohesive (∞,1)-topos

cohesive homotopy type theory

Backround

Definition

Presentation over a site

Structures in a cohesive (,1)-topos

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Structures with infinitesimal cohesion

infinitesimal cohesion

Models

Differential geometry

-Lie theory

∞-Lie theory

Background

Smooth structure

Higher groupoids

Lie theory

∞-Lie groupoids

∞-Lie algebroids

Formal Lie groupoids

Cohomology

Homotopy

Examples

-Lie groupoids

-Lie groups

-Lie algebroids

-Lie algebras

Contents

Idea

In every cohesive (∞,1)-topos there is a notion of concrete cohesive ∞-groupoids. Here we discuss concrete smooth ∞-groupoids. These are the higher generalization of diffeological spaces.

Definition

The general abstract definition is:

Definition

A concrete smooth -groupoid is a concrete cohesive ∞-groupoids in Smooth∞Grpd.

We will compare this intrinsic definition with more concrete models:

Definition

A diffeological space is a concrete sheaf on the site CartSp smooth.

Write

DiffeolSpaceSh(CartSp)DiffeolSpace \hookrightarrow Sh(CartSp)

for the full subcategory on diffeological spaces. Notice that is a quasitopos.

Definition

A diffeological groupoid is an internal groupoid in the category of diffeological spaces.

(…)

Special cases

We discuss the special cases of n-truncated concrete smooth -groupoids:

Diffeological spaces

Proposition

Concrete smooth 0-groupoids are equivalently diffeological spaces.

More in detail, write Conc(τ 0SmoothGrpd) for the full subcategory on the concrete 0-truncated objects. This is equivalent to the category of diffeological spaces

DiffeolSpConc(τ 0SmoothGrpd).DiffeolSp \simeq Conc(\tau_{\leq 0} Smooth \infty Grpd) \,.
Proof

Let XSh(CartSp)SmoothGrpd be a sheaf on CartSp. The condition for it to be concrete is that the unit

XcoDiscΓXX \to coDisc \Gamma X

is a monomorphism. Since monomorphisms of sheaves are detected objectwise (see category of sheaves) this is equivalent to the statement that for all UCartSp the morphism

X(U)SmoothGrpd(U,X)SmoothGrpd(U,coDiscΓX)Grpd(ΓU,ΓX)X(U) \simeq Smooth\infty Grpd(U, X) \to Smooth \infty Grpd(U, coDisc \Gamma X) \simeq \infty Grpd(\Gamma U, \Gamma X)

is a monomorphism of sets, where in the first step we used the (∞,1)-Yoneda lemma and in the last one the (ΓcoDisc)-adjunction.

That this morphism is indeed Γ:Sh(U,X)Set(Γ(U),Γ(X))Grpd(Γ(U),Γ(X)) follows by chasing the identity on ΓX through the adjunction naturality square for any morphism f:UX

Set(ΓX,ΓX) Sh(X,coDiscΓX) Γ(f) * f * Set(ΓU,ΓX) Sh(U,coDiscΓX).\array{ Set(\Gamma X, \Gamma X) &\stackrel{\simeq}{\to}& Sh(X, coDisc \Gamma X) \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\Gamma(f)^*}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{f^*}} \\ Set(\Gamma U, \Gamma X) &\stackrel{\simeq}{\leftarrow}& Sh(U, coDisc \Gamma X) } \,.

So this is indeed the defining condition for concrete sheaves that defines diffeological spaces.

Corollary

The canonical embedding SmoothMfdSmoothGrpd from above factors through diffeological spaces: we have a sequence of full and faithful (∞,1)-functors

SmoothMfdDiffeolSpSmoothGrpd.SmoothMfd \hookrightarrow DiffeolSp \hookrightarrow Smooth \infty Grpd \,.

Diffeological groupoids

We want to say the following

Proposition

Concrete 1-truncated smooth -groupoids are equivalent to diffeological groupoids, def. 3.

(…)

Proof

Let A be 1-truncated and concrete. Then by definition there is a concrete 0-truncated object A 0 and an effective epimorphism A 0A – an atlas – , such that the (∞,1)-pullback

A 1:=A 0× AA 0A_1 := A_0 \times_A A_0

is itself concrete.

Since A is assumed to be 1-truncated, it follows that A 1 is 0-truncated. By Giraud's axioms in the (∞,1)-topos Smooth∞Grpd we have that A is equivalent to the groupoid object in an (∞,1)-category A 1A 0:

(1)Alim (A 1A 0).A \simeq \lim_\to (A_1 \stackrel{\to}{\to} A_0) \,.

Now by prop. 1 both A 0 and A 1 are diffeological spaces. Hence the above exhibits A as equivalent to a diffeological groupoid.

(…)

Transgression of differential cocycles to mapping spaces

For n, write B nU(1) connSmoothGrpd for the smooth -groupoid given under the Dold-Kan correspondence by the Deligne complex. Over smooth manifolds this is the coefficient object for circle n-bundles with connection.

At ∞-Chern-Simons theory the following fact is proven:

Proposition

Let Σ be a closed smooth manifold of dimension dimΣn. Then there is an equivalence

hol:τ ndimΣH(Σ,B nU(1) conn)B ndimΣU(1)hol : \tau_{n - dim \Sigma} \mathbf{H}(\Sigma, \mathbf{B}^n U(1)_{conn}) \to B^{n-dim \Sigma} U(1)

of discrete ∞-groupoids such that for dimσ=n this computes the n-volume holonomy of circle n-bundles with connection.

Using concretization we want to refine this from discrete to smooth -groupoids.

Write [Σ,B nU(1) conn] for the internal hom in the (∞,1)-topos (see there).

We first look at this for n=dimΣ

Proposition

For dimΣ=n there is an equivalence

hol:Concτ 0[Σ,B nU(1) conn]U(1)hol : Conc \tau_0 [\Sigma, \mathbf{B}^nU(1)_{conn}] \to U(1)

in Smooth∞Grpd.

Proof

Since τ 0[Σ,B nU(1) conn] is 0-truncated, hence a sheaf, concretification is that discussed at concrete sheaves:

Conc(F)(U)=image(F(U)=H(U,F)H(U,coDiscΓF)=Set(Γ(U),Γ(F))).Conc(F)(U) = image( F(U) = \mathbf{H}(U,F) \to \mathbf{H}(U, coDisc \Gamma F) = Set(\Gamma(U), \Gamma(F)) ) \,.

So for U=* first of all we have by prop. 3 that

Concτ 0H(Σ,B nU(1) conn)(*)=U(1)Conc \tau_0 \mathbf{H}(\Sigma, \mathbf{B}^n U(1)_{conn})(*) = U(1)

in Set.

Generally Concτ 0H(Σ,B nU(1) conn)(U) is therefore a subset of the set of functions of sets UU(1). We need to show that it is precisely the set of smooth such functions.

But this is clear: holonomy of a smoth family of smoth circle n-bundles is a smooth function. Moreover, every smooth function arises this way: for f:UU(1) any smooth function, pick a trivial family of trivial circle n-bundles with connection and then rescale the connection form using f.

References

Many of the ideas involved here are due to Dave Carchedi.

A writeup of some aspects is in section 3.3.1 of

Revised on June 29, 2011 12:13:50 by Urs Schreiber (131.211.238.160)