This entry provides some hyperlinks for the articles
Daniel S. Freed, Michael Hopkins, Constantin Teleman,
Loop Groups and Twisted K-Theory I,
J. Topology, 4 (2011), 737-789
Loop Groups and Twisted K-Theory II,
J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (2013), 595-644
Loop Groups and Twisted K-Theory III,
Annals of Mathematics, Volume 174 (2011) 947-1007
about the twisted ad-equivariant K-theory of compact Lie groups, and the positive energy representations of their loop groups (forming the Verlinde ring). Part II also deals with Dirac induction and the orbit method for producing representations by the geometric quantization of coadjoint orbits.
Exposition:
This identification enhanced to an equivalence of categories:
Daniel S. Freed, Constantin Teleman,
Dirac families for loop groups as matrix factorizations,
Comptes Rendus Mathematique, Volume 353, Issue 5, May 2015, Pages 415-419
We identify the category of integrable lowest-weight representations of the loop group $L G$ of a compact Lie group $G$ with the linear category of twisted, conjugation-equivariant curved Fredholm complexes on the group $G$: namely, the twisted, equivariant matrix factorizations of a super-potential built from the loop rotation action on $L G$. This lifts the isomorphism of K-groups of [FHT1,2, 3] to an equivalence of categories. The construction uses families of Dirac operators.
Every $\mathfrak{g}$-valued differential form $A \in \Omega^1(S^1, \mathfrak{g})$ on the circle defines an element in the free loop group. Also it can be understood as a connection on a $G$-principal bundle over the circle.
Given a Dirac operator $D$ on an associated spinor bundle over the circle, and using a loop group representation $V$ one can hence shift its defining connection by $A$ and form the associated Dirac operator $D_A$.
By remembering for each $A$ its holonomy $hol(A) \in G$, this construction defines a $G$-parameterized family of Fredholm operators over $G$, one for each loop group representation.
This construction is (FHT, part II, cor. 3.39).
The FHT-theorem asserts that this construction gives an equivalence of the category of loop group representations at some level $\tau$ (Verlinde ring) and the $\tau$-twisted K-theory, equivariant with respect to $Ad_G$, on $G$.
This is (FHT, part II, theorem. 3.43).
Some raw notes from a Teleman talk, to be polished
Group actions on categories and Langlands duality
I. Index formula on moduli of G_bundles and TQFT
revolves around the Verlinde formula
formulation in twisted K-theory
generalization from line bundles to general vector bundles
For line bundles, relation between loop groups reps on twisted K-theory
construction of twisted K-theory classes from families of Dirac operators
start
$G$ a compact Lie group connected simply connected
$T \subset G$ maximal torus, $T^\vee$ the dual torus, $W$ Weyl group
$k \in \mathbb{Z} \simeq H^4(B G, \mathbb{Z})$ called the “level”
$\Sigma$ a closed oriented Riemann surface
$K_G(\Sigma) = Flat G Bund(\Sigma) \simeq Hom(\pi_1 \Sigma, G)/G$ the moduli space of flat $G$-principal bundles on $\Sigma$. This inherits a complex structure from $\Sigma$
the determinant line bundle for $G = SU(n)$ $det^{-k} H^\bullet(\Sigma, standard vector bundle)$
Intense activity was generated in 1990s by the Verlinde formula suggested by CFT
which is the partition function of a CFT level-$k$ line bundle
Digression recall that 2d TQFTs correspond to Frobenius algebras.
If $A$ is a semi-simple algebra $\simeq \oplus \mathbb{C} P_i$, where
$\theta(P_i) = \theta_i \in \mathbb{C}^\times$ and $Z(\Sigma) = \sum \theta_i^{1-g(\Sigma)}$
In our case, the Verlinde ring is a Frobenius ring / $\mathbb{Z}$. It is a quotient of the ring of representations $R_G$ by the ideal of characters vanishing at the regular points $F = ker(T \stackrel{k+c}{\to}T^\vee)$, where $c$ is the dual Coxeter number?
the isogeny of $k$ being defined by the level
the projectors $P_f$ range over $f \in F^{reg}/W$ ($F$ a Weyl orbit)
The traces $\theta(P_f) = \frac{vol(c_f)}{|F|} = \frac{\Delta(f)^2}{|F|}$
Where $c_F$ is order of conjugacy class of $F$
Substantial work went into proving various casesy of the formula…
A distinction aroise between the moduli space topological space and the moduli stack of all algebraic $G_{\mathbb{C}}$-bundles;
turned out to be immaterial for holomorphic sections (and higher cohomology of line bundles, which vanishes in both cases)
But for more general vector bundles it became cleat that the Verline-style formulas apply to the moduli stack and not the space
Recall that Narasimhan-Sechadri identity the moduli space of semi-stable algebraic $G_{\mathbb{C}}$ bundles (modulo grade invariance)
The moduli stack of all holomorphic $G_{\mathbb{C}}$-bundles
Has an atractive complex analytic presentation due to Graeme Segal
choose a disk $\Delta \subset \Sigma$ with smooth parameterized boundary $\partial \Delta$. Then the stack $\mathcal{M}_G(\Sigma)$ is the double coset $Hol(\Delta, G_{\mathbb{C}})\backslash L G_{\mathbb{C}} / Hol(\Sigma \backslash \Delta, G_{\mathbb{C}})$
where the holomorphic maps have smooth boundary values
The variety
is a complex Kähler homogeneous space for $L G_{\mathbb{C}}$ analogous in many ways to a flag variety of complex semsimple Lie groups
As a symplectic manifold it can be realized as
The symplectic structure here is independent of the complex structure omn $\Sigma$
The $L G$ action is projective Hamiltonian, being a central extension lift to the prequantum line bundle
So holomorphic and cohomological questions about the stack of all $G_{\mathbb{C}}$-bundles on $\Sigma$ is equivalently
$Hol(\Delta, G)$-equivariant holomorphic and cohomological on $X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}$
Example: What is $H^0(X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}, \mathcal{O}(k))$ as an $L G$-representation? Turns out the multiplicity of a certain “vacuum” representation inside is equal to $dim H^0(K_G(\Sigma), \mathcal{O}(k))$
While complex analysis on such infinite-dimensional manifolds is still out of reach, there exists an algebraic model for $X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}$ for which we can ask and answer analogous question
Example: $H^{\gt 0}(X^{ab}_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}, \mathcal{O}(k)) = 0$ “Kodeira vanishing”
So we have an analytic index theorem for these varieties but without a topological side (this was “paradoxical”, because usually the topological side is easier.)
But this requires finding a receptable fot the topological index (Riemann-Roch theorem)
Whet $\mathcal{G}$ acts on R%X%, RR takes values in
fiber integration in generalized cohomology theory
Here $K_{L G}(point)$ is not “topological”, not got equivariant K-theory for non-compact groups!, so that map $p_*$
But it turns out that both problems have a simultaneous solution.
Instead consider $K_{L G}(\mathcal{A}_{S^1})$ for the gauge action of $L G$ inb tge space of flat $G$-connections on the circle
Instead of projecting $X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}$ to a point, use the flat connection model and restrict to the boundary $\partial \Delta : X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta} \o \mathcal{A}_{\partial \Delta}$
This is a proper map!
The based loop group $\Omega G$ acts freely and we can
which leads to a well-defined map
Amendments;
we wanted projective representations of $L G$ with cocycle
So we should map to the twisted K-theory group
actually there is an extra shift by the dual Coxeter number $c$ ($= n$ for $SU(n)$) coming from the spinors $\sqrt K$ on $X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}$, and the key theorem is
Freed-Hopkins-Teleman theorem:
is a free abelian group generated by the positive energey irreps of $L G$ at level $k$.
generalization by Teleman and Woodward:
analytical index = topological index for $X_{\Sigma \backslash \Delta}^alg$
for essentially all K-theory clases, at least after inverting $k+ c$
II. From loop group representations to K-theory
Preparation: Compact groups:
Recall the Kirillov correspondence between
irreducilble representations and co-adjoint orbits (+ line bundles)
In the connected case it can be summarized by saying that both of those correspond to the set of dominant integral regular wheights.
Example: $n$-dimensional rep of $SU(2)$: sphere of radius $n$ in $\mathfrak{su}(2) \simeq \mathbb{R}^3$
for $SO(3)$, odd radii,
but one can describe a canonical correspondence without directs reference to the classification of irreps
Each coadjoint orbit has a symplectic form (see at orbit method)
For a vector bundle $V$ on the orbit $O_\lambda$ of $\lambda$, which is a sum of line bundles with curvature $\omega_\lambda$ and which carries a lifted $G$-action.
The Dirac index $D Ind(O_\lambda, V)$ is a representation of $G$ and this establishes the Kirillov correspondence
Remarks: For connected $G$, $V$ carries no information beyond its rank
Wehn $\pi_1(G) \neq 0$ the $G$-action on $V$ should be projective and cancel the spinor projective cocycle
The Dirac family consruction (Freed, Hopkins, Teleman) provides an inverse to this, assigning an orbit,…
Input: irreducible representation $V_\lambda$ of $G$
$\omega$ highest weight $\lambda$ invariant metric on $\mathfrak{g}$
Use Kostant’s “cubic Dirac operator” on $G$, which is the Dirac operator on $G$ for the metric connection with canonical torsion coming from $H^3(G, \mathbb{Z}) \simeq \mathbb{Z}$.
Two key properties of this Dirac operator
(translation)
on $V_\lambda \otimes S^{\pm}$
The Dirac family is the $\mathbb{Z}/2$-graded vector bundle with fiber $V \otimes S^{\pm}$ over $\mathfrak{g}$ and odd operator
Theorem (FHT): The kernel of $D^V_\xi$ is supported on the orbit of $(\lambda + p)$ and equals $(Kirillov line bundle) \otimes (Spinors to normal bundle)$ In fact $D^V_\xi$ is a model for the Atiyah-Bott-Shapiro…
Last revised on October 31, 2020 at 12:06:19. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.