nLab analogy between 11D and 5D SuGra -- table

Structural similarity between D=11 and minimal D=5 supergravity
(cf. Mizoguchi & Ohta 1998; Fujii, Kemmoku & Mizoguchi 1999, 2000)

bulk spacetime dimension	$D=11$	$D = 5$
bulk (higher) gauge field	C-field	MCS field
electric brane	probe M2-brane black M2-brane	?0-brane black hole in 5D
magnetic brane	probe M5-brane black M5-brane	L1-brane black string
near horizon geometries	el: $AdS_4 \times S^7$ mg: $AdS_7 \times S^4$	el: $AdS_2 \times S^3$ mg: $AdS_3 \times S^2$
bulk magnetic flux density	$G_4$	$F_2$
bulk electric flux density	$G_7 = \star_{11} G_4$	$F_3 = \star_5 F_2$
chiral flux on mg brane	$H_3$	$H_1$
Bianchi identities	$\begin{aligned}\mathrm{d} G_4 & = 0 \\ \mathrm{d} G_7 & = \tfrac{1}{2} G_4 \wedge G_4 \\ \mathrm{d} H_3 & = \phi^\ast G_4\end{aligned}$	$\begin{aligned}\mathrm{d} F_2 & = 0 \\ \mathrm{d} F_3 & = \tfrac{1}{2} F_2 \wedge F_2 \\ \mathrm{d} H_1 & = \phi^\ast F_2 \end{aligned}$
proper flux quantization minimally classified by	quaternionic Hopf fibration $S^7 \longrightarrow S^4$	complex Hopf fibration $S^3 \longrightarrow S^2$