In the physics of cosmology, what is called chaotic cosmic inflation (Linde 83) or chaotic eternal inflation is one variant model of the physics of cosmic inflation.
The name comes about since the model naturally predicts an ambient spacetime manifold in which local regions stochastically undergo cosmic inflation. The idea is that one such region would be what we observe from the inside as our observable universe. This large-scale picture of chaotic inflation has later come to be referred to as a multiverse (but see the caveats there).
While the theory of cosmic inflation in general is in excellent agreement with astrophysical experiment, chaotic inflation, which generically predicts large values of the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ is disfavored by recent measurements which show low upper bounds on $r$ (PlanckCollaboration 13, BICEP2-Keck-Planck 15). (These low values of $r$ instead prefer the Starobinsky model of cosmic inflation.)
Despite its name and its consequences, chaotic inflation is arguably the most uncontrived model of cosmic inflation, in that (reviewed e.g. in Linde 02, section II) it takes the potential term $V$ of the hypothetical inflaton field $\phi$ simply to be parabolic
hence to be the standard mass term of a scalar field (phi^2 interaction).
Whereas other inflationary models assume a more monotonely decreasing potential with and assume in an ad hoc way that the inflaton field is to have a large amplitude “at the big bang” to then slowly “roll down” (at each point in spacetime, being a field!) its potential, the idea of (Linde 83) is that instead the inflaton by and large sits in its potential minimum in equilibrium, but that quantum fluctuations stochastically (“chaotically”) drive it out of its minimum here and there. Wherever this happens cosmic inflation sets in and blows up the region of the ambient spacetime in which the inflaton happened to have fluctuated out of its equilibrium.
This idea of “chaotic” inflation driven by vacuum fluctuations of the inflator is in fact not tied to the simple square potential as above, and various variants have been considered, such as a Higgs field-like potential with a quartic term added.
The idea of eternal cosmic inflation has been argued to provide a possible way to conceptualize the measured values of dimensionless “physical constants”, such as the fine structure constant, the Yukawa couplings and notably the cosmological constant: for if in the fundamental theory these parameters are not really constants but are dynamical fields that just happen to have constant value (“moduli fields”) over large scales, then they might, so the argument, still vary from one “inflationary bubble” to the next. Thereby the idea of eternal inflation combined with that of a fundamental theory that has moduli fields (such as string theory with its landscape of string theory vacua) has been argued to put “physical constants” on the same footing as other more or less random phenomenological parameters, such as for instance the distance of our planets from the sun, etc.
For more on this see at multiverse.
The original article is
Reviews include
Andrei Linde, Inflationary Theory versus Ekpyrotic/Cyclic Scenario (arXiv:hep-th/0205259)
Alan Guth, Eternal inflation and its implications (arXiv:hep-th/0702178)
Andrei Linde, Eternally Existing Self-Reproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe Physics Letters B 175 (4): 395–400. (pdf)
Wikipedia, Eternal inflation
The relevant experimental results (disfavoring the model) are due to
Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation (arXiv:1303.5082)
A Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data (arXiv:1502.00612)
Last revised on April 10, 2020 at 15:38:30. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.