symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
With braiding
With duals for objects
category with duals (list of them)
dualizable object (what they have)
ribbon category, a.k.a. tortile category
With duals for morphisms
monoidal dagger-category?
With traces
Closed structure
Special sorts of products
Semisimplicity
Morphisms
Internal monoids
Examples
Theorems
In higher category theory
The Grothendieck ring of every fusion category can be naturally viewed as an (algebraic) fusion ring. The structure of this resulting ring is purely determined by the fusion rules of the staring category. Hence, it is known as the fusion ring of the fusion category.
This ring encodes a large amount of the structure of the category, but not all of it. Namely, there are non-isomorphic fusion categories with isomorphic fusion rings. For example, the representation categories of the two non-isomorphic non-abelian groups of order eight have isomorphic fusion rings.
The strongest result in this direction is Ocneanu Rigidity, which asserts that there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of categories which induce a given fusion ring. A standard approach towards classifications of fusion categories thus begins by first understanding fusion rings, and then understanding what categorifications can be imposed.
Such a choice of categorification amounts to a choice of associativity on the monoidal structure of your category. These associativity rules can be also described explicitely in terms of algebraic structure on your distinguished basis by using 6j symbols.
Let be a fusion category, i.e. a tensor category which is finite and semisimple (i.e. it has a finite number of isomorphism classes of simple objects, all finite direct sums of these exist, and every object is isomorphic to such).
Let be the Grothendieck ring of . That is, the ring whose objects are isomorphism classes of objects in , whose addition is defined by , and whose multiplication is defined by .
The set of simple objects of give a -basis for . This follows immediately from the fact that every object is isomorphic to the direct sum of some integer number of copies of every simple objects.
The fact that the tensor unit is simple implies that is moreover a unital ring.
The rigidity structure on induces an anti-involution on , which gives it the structure of a fusion ring.
Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, Victor Ostrik Tensor categories. Vol. 205. American Mathematical Soc., 2016.
Sonia Natale. “On the classification of fusion categories.” Proc. Int. Congr. Mathematicians, Rio de Janeiro (2018): 173-200.
Last revised on July 18, 2023 at 17:28:58. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.