nLab Spinᶜ(6)

Contents

Contents

Idea

Spin c(6)Spin^\mathrm{c}(6) is the fourth spinᶜ group. It is used to describe spinᶜ structures on orientable 6-manifolds.

Properties

Proposition

One has a canonical double cover of the unitary group in dimension 4:

Spin c(6)↠U(4). Spin^\mathrm{c}(6) \twoheadrightarrow U(4).

Proof

Using the exceptional isomorphism Spin(6)≅SU(4)Spin(6)\cong SU(4) yields:

Spin c(6)≅(Spin(6)×U(1))/ℤ 2=(SU(4)×U(1))/ℤ 2↠(SU(4)×U(1))/ℤ 4≅U(4). Spin^\mathrm{c}(6) \cong(Spin(6)\times U(1))/\mathbb{Z}_2 =(SU(4)\times U(1))/\mathbb{Z}_2 \twoheadrightarrow(SU(4)\times U(1))/\mathbb{Z}_4 \cong U(4).

(In general, one has (SU(n)×U(1))/ℤ n≅U(n)(SU(n)\times U(1))/\mathbb{Z}_n\cong U(n) using the homomorphism theorem? on the group homomorphism SU(n)×U(1)→U(n),(U,z)↦UzSU(n)\times U(1)\rightarrow U(n),(U,z)\mapsto Uz, which is surjective and has {(ζ n k1 n,ζ n −k)|[k]∈ℤ n}≅ℤ n\{(\zeta_n^k\mathbf{1}_n,\zeta_n^{-k})|[k]\in\mathbb{Z}_n \}\cong\mathbb{Z}_n as kernel.)

A double cover is the same as an principal O(1)-bundle and corresponds uniquely to a real line bundle Spin c(6)× O(1)ℝtwohearightarrowU(4)Spin^\mathrm{c}(6)\times_{O(1)}\mathbb{R}\twohearightarrow U(4) with the balanced product. Both are classified uniquely by the first Stiefel-Whitney class w 1(Spin c(6))∈H 1(U(4),ℤ 2)w_1(Spin^\mathrm{c}(6))\in H^1(U(4),\mathbb{Z}_2), as it is a group isomorphism? over CW complexes like U(4)U(4). Using the universal coefficient theorem and the Hurewicz theorem yields:

H 1(U(4),ℤ 2)≅Hom(H 1(U(4),ℤ),ℤ 2)≅Hom(π 1 ab(U(4)),ℤ 2)≅Hom(ℤ,ℤ 2)≅ℤ 2. H^1(U(4),\mathbb{Z}_2) \cong Hom(H_1(U(4),\mathbb{Z}),\mathbb{Z}_2) \cong Hom(\pi_1^\mathrm{ab}(U(4)),\mathbb{Z}_2) \cong Hom(\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z}_2) \cong\mathbb{Z}_2.

(π 1 ab(U(4))≅ℤ\pi_1^\mathrm{ab}(U(4))\cong\mathbb{Z} follows from the determinant det:U(4)→U(1)det\colon U(4)\rightarrow U(1) inducing a group isomorphism? on the fundamental group.) Now there are two possibilities for the above first Stiefel-Whitney class, which are the trivial and the unique non-trivial one. Since the former would lead to the Lie group isomorphism? Spin c(6)≅U(4)×O(1)Spin^\mathrm{c}(6)\cong U(4)\times O(1) between a connected and not connected space, it has to be the latter. Its classifying map can also be stated easily:

i∘det:U(4)↠U(1)≅S 1≅ℝP 1↪ℝP ∞≅BO(1) i\circ det\colon U(4)\twoheadrightarrow U(1)\cong S^1\cong\mathbb{R}P^1\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}P^\infty\cong BO(1)

The first pullback along the canonical inclusion i:S 1↪BO(1)i\colon S^1\hookrightarrow BO(1) is the real Hopf fibration i *S ∞≅i *EO(1)≅S 1↠S 1i^*S^\infty\cong i^*EO(1)\cong S^1\twoheadrightarrow S^1 with unique non-trivial first Stiefel-Whitney class w 1(S 1)∈H 1(S 1,ℤ 2)≅ℤ 2w_1(S^1)\in H^1(S^1,\mathbb{Z}_2)\cong\mathbb{Z}_2. (Or better denoted as that of the tautological line bundle γ ℝ 1,1=S 1× O(1)ℝ\gamma_{\mathbb{R}}^{1,1}=S^1\times_{O(1)}\mathbb{R}, since the identically denoted first Stiefel-Whitney class of the tangent bundle is trivial.) The second pullback along the determinant (which is not the determinant line bundle) preserves this. Now there is an alternative description:

Spin c(6)≅{(U,z)∈U(4)×U(1)|det(U)=z 2}. Spin^\mathrm{c}(6) \cong\{(U,z)\in U(4)\times U(1)|det(U)=z^2\}.

and the double cover can be easily spotted in the missing sign of the complex number.

Last revised on April 6, 2026 at 15:30:20. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.