and
rational homotopy theory (equivariant, stable, parametrized, equivariant & stable, parametrized & stable)
Examples of Sullivan models in rational homotopy theory:
A minimal model for a spherical fibration in rational homotopy theory.
Let be a natural number, , let
be a spherical fibration of topological spaces such that admits a Sullivan model . Then a Sullivan model for the total space is of the following form:
odd
If is an odd number, then
for some
being the rational Euler class of the spherical fibration.
In particular, if is the unit sphere bundle of a real vector bundle , then
is the Euler class of that vector bundle and is a cochain on the unit sphere bundle which on the fundamental class of any (2k+1)-sphere fiber evaluates to minus unity:
even
If is an even number, then the Sullivan model for a rank- spherical fibration over some with Sullivan model is
where
the new generator evaluates to unity on the fundamental classes of the 2k-sphere fibers over each point :
is some element in the base algebra, which by (5) is closed and represents the rational cohomology class of the cup square of the class of :
and this class classifies the spherical fibration, rationally.
Moreover, if the spherical fibration happens to be the unit sphere bundle of a real vector bundle , then
the class of is the rationalized Euler class of the corresponding (…) rank reduction of :
the class of is th the rationalized th Pontryagin class of :
This may be found as Félix-Halperin-Thomas 00, 15, Example 4, p. 202, see also Félix-Oprea-Tanré 16, Prop. 2.3. The fiber integral (4) follows by this Prop..
Beware that the Sullivan models for spherical fibrations in Prop. are not in general minimal Sullivan models.
For example over the classifying space of SO(8) with indecomposable Euler class generator the equation (2) for the univeral 7-sperical fibration violates the Sullivan minimality condition (which requires that the right hand side is at least a binary wedge product of generators, or equivalently that the degree of the new generator is greater than that of any previous generators).
But the Sullivan models in Prop. are relative minimal models, relative to the Sullivan model for the base.
This means in particular that the new generators of these models reflect non-torsion relative homotopy groups?, but not in general non-torsion absolute homotopy groups.
By general facts (see at ∞-action) a spherical fibration as in (6) is classified by a map to the classifying space of the automorphism ∞-group inside the mapping space from to itself, which is those connected components corresponding to degree
Hence the spherical fibration is given by the homotopy pullback
of the universal spherical fibration along a classifying map .
The rational homotopy type of these connected components of the mapping space are given by Sullivan models of mapping spaces:
Let be a natural number and a continuous function from the n-sphere to itself. Then the connected component of the mapping space which contains this map has the following rational homotopy type:
where is the degree of .
(Møller-Raussen 85, Example 2.5, Cohen-Voronov 05, Lemma 5.3.5)
Here Prop. and Prop. are two aspects of the same situation:
For an odd number the rational Euler class (3) of the spherical fibration is the class of the rational classifying map to the shift of in (7);
for an even number the rational Pontryagin class (?) of the spherical fibration is the class of the rational classifying map to the shift of in (7).
Examples of Sullivan models in rational homotopy theory:
Yves Félix, Steve Halperin, J.C. Thomas, Rational Homotopy Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 205, Springer-Verlag, 2000.
Jesper Møller, Martin Raussen, Rational Homotopy of Spaces of Maps Into Spheres and Complex Projective Spaces, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 292, No. 2 (Dec., 1985), pp. 721-732 (jstor:2000242)
Ralph Cohen, Alexander Voronov, Notes on string topology (arXiv:math/0503625)
Yves Félix, John Oprea, Daniel Tanré, Prop. 2.3 in Lie-model for Thom spaces of tangent bundles, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 1829-1840 (pdf, doi:10.1090/proc/12829)
Last revised on March 4, 2024 at 23:23:04. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.