nLab
rational stable homotopy theory

Contents

Context

Stable Homotopy theory

Homological algebra

homological algebra

(also nonabelian homological algebra)

Introduction

Context

Basic definitions

Stable homotopy theory notions

Constructions

Lemmas

diagram chasing

Homology theories

Theorems

Contents

Idea

Rational stable homotopy theory is the simple special case of stable homotopy theory under rationalization.

It is a classical fact that the rationalization of classical homotopy theory (of topological spaces or simplicial sets) – called rational homotopy theory – is considerably more tractable than general homotopy theory, as exhibited by the existence of small concrete dg-algebraic models for rational homotopy types: minimal Sullivan algebras or equivalently their dual dg-coalgebras. A similar statement holds for the rationalization of stable homotopy theory i.e. the homotopy theory of spectra (of topological spaces or simplicial sets): rational spectra are equivalent to rational chain complexes, i.e. to dg-modules over \mathbb{Q}. This is a dg-model for rational stable homotopy theory compatible with that of classical rational homotopy theory in that the stabilization adjunction that connects classical homotopy theory to stable homotopy theory is, under these identifications, modeled by the forgetful functor from dg-(co-)algebras to chain complexes

classical homotopy theory stable homotopy theory spaces Σ Ω spectra stabilization rationally dg(co)algebras underlyingfree chain complexes \array{ & \text{classical homotopy theory} && \text{stable homotopy theory} \\ & spaces & \underoverset{\underset{\Sigma^\infty}{\longrightarrow}}{\overset{\Omega^\infty}{\longleftarrow}}{} & spectra \\ & & \text{stabilization} \\ \text{rationally} & \text{dg(co)algebras} & \underoverset{\underset{underlying}{\longrightarrow}}{\overset{free}{\longleftarrow}}{} & \text{chain complexes} }

Rational spectra

Theorem

By the stable Dold-Kan correspondence, the (stable) homotopy theory of rationalized spectra, namely of HH \mathbb{Q}-module spectra is equivalent to that of chain complexes of modules/vector space over the rational numbers

HModSpectraCh (). H \mathbb{Q} ModSpectra \;\simeq\; Ch_\bullet(\mathbb{Q}) \,.

(Schwede-Shipley 03, theorem 5.1.6)

Remark

Observe that HH \mathbb{Q}-module spectra are just the rational spectra. Since rationalization of spectra is the smashing localization ()H(-)\wedge H \mathbb{Q} (here) every rational spectrum XHXX \simeq H \mathbb{Q} \wedge X carries an HH \mathbb{Q}-module structure. Conversely, just as a \mathbb{Q}-module structure on an abelian group is unique if it exists, so an HH \mathbb{Q}-module spectrum structure on a spectrum is essentially unique if it exists, due to the fact that the multiplication map HHHH \mathbb{Q} \wedge H \mathbb{Q} \to H \mathbb{Q} is an equivalence.

Theorem parallels that of classical rational homotopy theory:

Theorem

There is an equivalence of homotopy theories between the homotopy theory of nilpotent rational topological spaces of finite type with that of cochain dgc-algebras over \mathbb{Q} in non-negative degree

Grpd ,nil,findgcAlg ,nil,fin 0 \infty Grpd_{\mathbb{Q}, nil,fin} \;\simeq\; dgcAlg^{\geq 0}_{\mathbb{Q},nil,fin}

Rational stabilization

Proposition

The following composite total derived functors

Ho(Spectra ,fin) Ho(Ch ,,fin) cn 2𝕃i 2 Ho(Ch ,>1,fin) () * Ho(Ch ,fin >1) op (𝕃Sym /[0]) op((Uker(ϵ ()))) op Ho(dgcAlg ,fin >0) /[0]) op Ho(Top ,>1,fin) \array{ \mathrm{Ho}( \mathrm{Spectra}_{\mathbb{Q}, \mathrm{fin}} ) \\ \downarrow \simeq \uparrow \\ \mathrm{Ho}( \mathrm{Ch}_{\mathbb{Q},\bullet,\mathrm{fin}} ) & \underoverset \underset{\mathbb{R}\mathrm{cn}_2}{\longrightarrow} \overset{\mathbb{L} i_2}{\longleftarrow} {\bot} & \mathrm{Ho}( \mathrm{Ch}_{\mathbb{Q}, \gt 1, \mathrm{fin}} ) \\ && \downarrow \simeq \uparrow^{(-)^\ast} \\ && \mathrm{Ho}( \mathrm{Ch}^{\gt 1}_{\mathbb{Q}, \mathrm{fin}} )^{\mathrm{op}} & \underoverset \underset{ (\mathbb{L}\mathrm{Sym}_{/\mathbb{Q}[0]})^{\mathrm{op}} }{\longrightarrow} \overset{ (\mathbb{R}( U \circ \mathrm{ker}(\epsilon_{(-)}) ))^{\mathrm{op}} }{\longleftarrow} {\bot} & \mathrm{Ho}( \mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\gt 0}_{\mathbb{Q}, \mathrm{fin}})_{/\mathbb{Q}[0]} )^{\mathrm{op}} \\ && && \updownarrow \simeq \\ && && \mathrm{Ho}(\mathrm{Top}_{\mathbb{Q}, \gt 1 , \mathrm{fin}}) }

(where the key part in the middle right, involving SymSym, is from prop. , the left middle part involving connectivity is from prop. , and the equivalences on the far left and far right are those from theorem and theorem , respectively)

agree with the restriction of the stabilization infinity-adjunction

SpectraΩ Σ Grpd */ Spectra \underoverset {\underset{\Omega^\infty}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\Sigma^\infty}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \infty Grpd^{\ast/}

to simply connected rational homotopy types of finite type.

Proof

By the nature of the classical model structure on topological spaces, every simply connected object of Ho(Top */)\mathrm{Ho}(\mathrm{Top}^{\ast/}) is represented by one that is a retract of a transfinite composition of pushouts of the pointed connected generating cofibrations S nD nS^n \to D^n, for n1n \geq 1. More abstractly, the (∞,1)-category of simply connected homotopy types is generated under (∞,1)-colimits from the n-spheres of dimension n2n \geq 2. (See the analogous argument used in the Brown representability theorem here).

Since Σ \Sigma^\infty is a left adjoint functor it is sufficient to check that the two functors agree on S nS^n for n1n \geq 1. That they agree on D nD^n is immediate. We hence need to consider their value on the positive dimensional nn-spheres:

Let nn be odd. Then the minimal Sullivan model for S nS^n is Sym([n])\mathrm{Sym}( \mathbb{R}[n] ). Since every dgc-algebra is fibrant in the projective model structure, the value of (Uker(ϵ ()))\mathbb{R}(U \circ \mathrm{ker}(\epsilon_{(-)})) on this model is represented by the value of Uker(ϵ ())U \circ \mathrm{ker}(\epsilon_{(-)}) on that model, which is the cochain complex [n]\mathbb{Q}[n], hence equivalently the corresponding chain complex. This is indeed the rationalization of Σ S n\Sigma^\infty S^n.

Next let nn be even with n1n \geq 1. Then the minimal Sullivan model for S nS^n is Sym([n][2n1],dc 2n1=c nc n)\mathrm{Sym}( \mathbb{R}[n] \oplus \mathbb{R}[2n-1], d c_{2n-1} = c_{n} \wedge c_n ). The underlying chain complex of the augmentation ideal is spanned by the elements c n kc_{n}^{\wedge^k} in degree nkn k and by the elements c n kc 2n1c_{n}^{\wedge^k} \wedge c_{2n-1} in degree nk+2n1nk+2n-1. The former elements are all closed, but except for k=1k = 1 are all in the image of the latter elements, none of which is closed. Hence this chain complex is quasi-isomorphic to [n]\mathbb{R}[n]. Again, this is indeed the rationalization of Σ S n\Sigma^\infty S^{n}

Appendix

Here collect some background definitions, notations and facts for ease of reference in the main text above.

Chain complexes

Throughout, let kk be a field of characteristic zero.

Definition

Write

  1. Ch k,\mathrm{Ch}_{k,\bullet} for the category of chain complexes of kk-vector spaces, i.e. the category of \mathbb{Z}-graded kk-vector spaces VV equipped with a linear map V:VV\partial_V : V \to V of degree -1 such that V V=0\partial_V \circ \partial_V = 0 (the differential);

  2. Ch k \mathrm{Ch}_k^\bullet for the category of cochain complexes of kk-vector spaces, i.e. as before, but with differential d Vd_V of degree +1.

For VV a kk-vector space, and nn \in \mathbb{N} we write V[n]V[n] for the (co-)chain complex concentrated on VV in degree kk.

For nn \in \mathbb{Z} write

Ch k,ni nCh k, \mathrm{Ch}_{k, \geq n} \overset{i_n}{\hookrightarrow} \mathrm{Ch}_{k,\bullet}
Ch k ni nCh k \mathrm{Ch}_k^{\geq n} \overset{i^n}{\hookrightarrow} \mathrm{Ch}_k^\bullet

for the full subcategories on the (co-)chain complexes that are concentrated in degrees n\geq n.

Proposition

The inclusions from def. have right resp. left adjoints, which we denote by

Ch k,cn ni nCh k,n \mathrm{Ch}_{k,\bullet} \underoverset {\underset{\mathrm{cn}_n}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{i_n}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathrm{Ch}_{k, \geq n}

and

Ch k 0i ncn nCh k . \mathrm{Ch}^{\geq 0}_k \underoverset {\underset {i_n}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\mathrm{cn}^n}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathrm{Ch}^\bullet_k \,.

These are Quillen adjunctions with respect to the projective model structure on chain complexes.

dgc-Algebras

Definition

We write dgcAlg k \mathrm{dgcAlg}^\bullet_k for the category of differential graded-commutative algebras over kk, i.e. commutative monoids in Ch k \mathrm{Ch}^\bullet_k. We write (dgcAlg k ) /k[0](\mathrm{dgcAlg}^\bullet_k)_{/k[0]} for its slice category over k=(k[0],d=0)dgcAlg 0k = (k[0], d = 0) \in \mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\geq 0}, hence for the category of augmented dgc-algebras, hence for dgc-algebras AA equipped with a homomorphism ϵ A:A(k[0],d=0)\epsilon_A : A \to (k[0], d = 0).

Finally we write

dgcAlg k 0dgcAlg k \mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\geq 0}_k \hookrightarrow \mathrm{dgcAlg}^\bullet_k

for the full subcategory of the dgc-algebras in non-negative degree, hence for the commutative monoids in Ch 0\mathrm{Ch}^{\geq 0}, and similarly for the augmented case

(dgcAlg k 0) /k[0](dgcAlg k ) /k[0]. (\mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\geq 0}_k)_{/k[0]} \hookrightarrow (\mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\bullet}_k)_{/k[0]} \,.
Proposition

There are adjunctions between the categories from def. of the form

dgcAlg k 0USymCh k 0 \mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\geq 0}_k \underoverset {\underset{U}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\mathrm{Sym}}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathrm{Ch}^{\geq 0}_k

and

(dgcAlg k 0) /k[0]Uker(ϵ ())Sym /k[0]Ch k 0 (\mathrm{dgcAlg}^{\geq 0}_k)_{/k[0]} \underoverset {\underset{U \circ \mathrm{ker}(\epsilon_{(-)})}{\longrightarrow} } {\overset{\mathrm{Sym}_{/k[0]}}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathrm{Ch}^{\geq 0}_k

where

  1. UU forms the underlying chain complex;

  2. ker(ϵ ())\mathrm{ker}(\epsilon_{(-)}) forms the augmentation ideal;

  3. Sym\mathrm{Sym} forms the free graded-commutative dg-algebra;

  4. Sym /k[0]\mathrm{Sym}_{/k[0]} forms the free graded-commutative dg-algebra and regards it with its canonical augmentation over kk.

Moreover, these are Quillen adjunctions: the first with respect to the projective model structure on chain complexes and the projective model structure on dgc-algebras and the second with respect to the corresponding slice model structure.

References

Last revised on February 23, 2017 at 06:05:10. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.