basic constructions:
strong axioms
further
In the foundations of mathematics, the axiom of infinity asserts that infinite sets exist. Infinite sets cannot be constructed from finite sets, so their existence must be posited as an extra axiom. Further axioms in this vein which assert the existence of even larger sets that cannot be constructed from smaller ones are called large cardinal axioms.
One common form of the axiom of infinity says that the particular set $N$ of natural numbers exists. In material set theory this often takes the form of asserting that the von Neumann ordinal number $\omega$ exists, where $\omega$ is characterized as the smallest set such that $\emptyset\in\omega$ and whenever $a\in \omega$ then $a\cup \{a\}\in \omega$. In structural set theory the usual form of the axiom of infinity is the existence of a natural numbers object.
In dependent type theory, the axiom of infinity for a Tarski universe is given by the element
which states that there is a natural numbers type in the universe.
In the form of an NNO, the axiom of infinity generalises to the existence of inductive types or W-types. These can be constructed from a NNO if power sets exist, but in predicative theories they can be added as additional axioms.
One could also posit the existence of the set of extended natural numbers instead of the set of natural numbers, as the set of extended natural numbers have countably infinite cardinality and is the categorical dual of the natural numbers in Set, a terminal coalgebra for the endofunctor $F(X) = 1 + X$ in Set. This generalises to the existence of coinductive types or M-types, which can be added as additional axioms.
One could also posit the existence of a universe $\mathcal{U}$ that satisfies the axiom of finiteness (see below).
Broadly speaking, finite mathematics is mathematics that does not use or need the axiom of infinity; a finitist is an extreme breed of constructivist that believes that mathematics is better without the axiom of infinity, or even that this axiom is false.
A more extreme case is to deny the axiom of infinity with an axiom of finiteness: every set is finite. There is one of these for every definition of ‘finite’ given on that page; here is the strongest stated directly in terms of set theory as an axiom of induction:
In material set theory, this is equivalent given the axiom of foundation (which guarantees that $X$ and $\{X\}$ are disjoint):
In higher categorical terms, the above axiom of finiteness could be stated as follows: Set is an initial algebra of the 2-endofunctor $F(X) \cong X \coprod 1$ in the (2,1)-category Grpd.
In relation to classifying toposes:
Last revised on March 27, 2023 at 13:32:17. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.